skip to main content
10.1145/2818187.2818289acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Approach for investigating crowdfunding campaigns with platform data: case indiegogo

Published:22 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Crowdfunding via the internet is a relatively new phenomenon in research and gaining momentum currently. While taking a data-driven approach into investigating the properties and dynamics of crowdfunding campaigns would allow the use of computational social science in investigations on crowdfunding, existing data-driven research on crowdfunding remains very limited. This is particularly true on the level of individual funder data. In this study, we contribute to the empirical body of knowledge on crowdfunding by introducing Indiegogo as a data source and, more specifically, the development and implementation of a crawler and scraper for accessing Indiegogo campaign data, and sharing this openly for other researchers. Due to the extremely dynamic and rapidly increasing amount of crowdfunding data in terms of the number of crowdfunding campaigns and the available investment and individual investor data, we believe our approach is useful for supporting public and open data-driven research, instead of providing merely a static data set.

References

  1. Álvarez, M., Pan, A., Raposo, J. and Hidalgo, J. 2006. Crawling Web Pages with Support for Client-Side Dynamism. Advances in Web-Age Information Management. J. X. Yu, M. Kitsuregawa, and H. V. Leong, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 252--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. An, J., Quercia, D. and Crowcroft, J. 2014. Recommending investors for crowdfunding projects. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web (2014), 261--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. and Schwienbacher, A. 2014. Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing. 29, 5 (2014), 585--609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bizer, C., Heath, T. and Berners-Lee, T. 2009. Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems. 5, 3 (2009), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bouncken, R. B., Komorek, M. and Kraus, S. 2015. Crowdfunding: The Current State Of Research. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER). 14, 3 (2015), 407--416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bretschneider, U., Knaub, K. and Wieck, E. 2014. Motivations for Crowdfunding: What Drives the Crowd to Invest in Start-Ups? (Tel Aviv, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cumming, D. J., Leboeuf, G. and Schwienbacher, A. 2014. Crowdfunding Models: Keep-it-All vs. All-or-Nothing. Paris December 2014 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-AFFI Paper (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisk, R. P., Patrício, L., Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M. and Parasuraman, A. 2011. Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of service management. 22, 4 (2011), 443--470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T. and Koeck, B. 2014. Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital. 16, 3 (2014), 247--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gat, I., Remencius, T., Sillitti, A., Succi, G. and Vlasenko, J. 2013. The API economy: Playing the devil's advocate. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gat, I. and Succi, G. 2013. A Survey of the API Economy. Cut. Consort. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenberg, M. D. and Gerber, E. M. 2014. Learning to fail: experiencing public failure online through crowdfunding. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014), 581--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Haas, P., Blohm, I. and Leimeister, J. M. 2014. An Empirical Taxonomy of Crowdfunding Intermediaries. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kandel, S., Heer, J., Plaisant, C., Kennedy, J., van Ham, F., Riche, N. H., Weaver, C., Lee, B., Brodbeck, D. and Buono, P. 2011. Research Directions in Data Wrangling: Visuatizations and Transformations for Usable and Credible Data. Information Visualization. 10, 4 (Oct. 2011), 271--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lasrado, L. A. 2013. Crowdfunding in Finland--A new Alterantive Disruptive Funding Instrument for Business. Tampere University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lasrado, L. A. and Lugmayr, A. 2013. Crowdfunding in Finland: A New Alternative Disruptive Funding Instrument for Businesses. Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media (2013), 194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mollick, E. 2014. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing. 29, 1 (2014), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Moritz, A. and Block, J. H. 2014. Crowdfunding: A Literature Review and Research Directions. Available at SSRN 2554444. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Müllerleile, T. and Joenssen, D. W. 2015. Key Success-Determinants of Crowdfunded Projects: An Exploratory Analysis. Data Science, Learning by Latent Structures, and Knowledge Discovery. Springer. 271--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Petschulat, S. 2010. Other people's data. Communications of the ACM. 53, 1 (Jan. 2010), 53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Posegga, O., Zylka, M. P. and Fischbach, K. 2015. Collective Dynamics of Crowdfunding Networks. System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on (2015), 3258--3267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Schulz, M., Haas, P., Schulthess, K., Blohm, I. and Leimeister, J. M. 2015. How Idea Creativity and Hedonic Value Influence Project Success in Crowdfunding. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Song, A., Lee, H., Ko, M. and Lee, U. 2015. Every Little Helps: Understanding Donor Behavior in a Crowdfunding Platform for Non-profits. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2015), 1103--1108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tech, R. P. 2014. Crowdfunding Hardware Startups in Germany. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Thies, F., Wessel, M. and Benlian, A. 2014. Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Social Buzz and Contribution Behavior within and between Online Platforms--Evidence from Crowdfunding. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Vassiliadis, P. 2009. A Survey of Extract--Transform--Load Technology. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining. 5, 3 (33 2009), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Vinoski, S. 2008. Serendipitous Reuse. Internet Computing. January/February 2008 (Feb. 2008), 84--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zheng, H., Wan, N., Chen, D. and Wang, T. 2014. Antecedents of Project Implementation Success in Crowdfunding. 18th PACIS, Chengdu, China. (2014), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Zuccalà, M. and Celino, I. 2015. Fostering Innovation Through Coopetition: The E015 Digital Ecosystem. Engineering the Web in the Big Data Era. Springer. 625--628.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Zvilichovsky, D., Inbar, Y. and Barzilay, O. 2014. Playing both sides of the market: success and reciprocity on crowdfunding platforms. Available at SSRN 2304101. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Approach for investigating crowdfunding campaigns with platform data: case indiegogo

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AcademicMindTrek '15: Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference
      September 2015
      230 pages
      ISBN:9781450339483
      DOI:10.1145/2818187

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 September 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      AcademicMindTrek '15 Paper Acceptance Rate33of51submissions,65%Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader