ABSTRACT
Crowdfunding via the internet is a relatively new phenomenon in research and gaining momentum currently. While taking a data-driven approach into investigating the properties and dynamics of crowdfunding campaigns would allow the use of computational social science in investigations on crowdfunding, existing data-driven research on crowdfunding remains very limited. This is particularly true on the level of individual funder data. In this study, we contribute to the empirical body of knowledge on crowdfunding by introducing Indiegogo as a data source and, more specifically, the development and implementation of a crawler and scraper for accessing Indiegogo campaign data, and sharing this openly for other researchers. Due to the extremely dynamic and rapidly increasing amount of crowdfunding data in terms of the number of crowdfunding campaigns and the available investment and individual investor data, we believe our approach is useful for supporting public and open data-driven research, instead of providing merely a static data set.
- Álvarez, M., Pan, A., Raposo, J. and Hidalgo, J. 2006. Crawling Web Pages with Support for Client-Side Dynamism. Advances in Web-Age Information Management. J. X. Yu, M. Kitsuregawa, and H. V. Leong, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 252--262. Google ScholarDigital Library
- An, J., Quercia, D. and Crowcroft, J. 2014. Recommending investors for crowdfunding projects. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web (2014), 261--270. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. and Schwienbacher, A. 2014. Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing. 29, 5 (2014), 585--609.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bizer, C., Heath, T. and Berners-Lee, T. 2009. Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems. 5, 3 (2009), 1--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bouncken, R. B., Komorek, M. and Kraus, S. 2015. Crowdfunding: The Current State Of Research. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER). 14, 3 (2015), 407--416.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bretschneider, U., Knaub, K. and Wieck, E. 2014. Motivations for Crowdfunding: What Drives the Crowd to Invest in Start-Ups? (Tel Aviv, 2014).Google Scholar
- Cumming, D. J., Leboeuf, G. and Schwienbacher, A. 2014. Crowdfunding Models: Keep-it-All vs. All-or-Nothing. Paris December 2014 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-AFFI Paper (2014).Google Scholar
- Fisk, R. P., Patrício, L., Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M. and Parasuraman, A. 2011. Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of service management. 22, 4 (2011), 443--470.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T. and Koeck, B. 2014. Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital. 16, 3 (2014), 247--269.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gat, I., Remencius, T., Sillitti, A., Succi, G. and Vlasenko, J. 2013. The API economy: Playing the devil's advocate. (2013).Google Scholar
- Gat, I. and Succi, G. 2013. A Survey of the API Economy. Cut. Consort. (2013).Google Scholar
- Greenberg, M. D. and Gerber, E. M. 2014. Learning to fail: experiencing public failure online through crowdfunding. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014), 581--590. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haas, P., Blohm, I. and Leimeister, J. M. 2014. An Empirical Taxonomy of Crowdfunding Intermediaries. (2014).Google Scholar
- Kandel, S., Heer, J., Plaisant, C., Kennedy, J., van Ham, F., Riche, N. H., Weaver, C., Lee, B., Brodbeck, D. and Buono, P. 2011. Research Directions in Data Wrangling: Visuatizations and Transformations for Usable and Credible Data. Information Visualization. 10, 4 (Oct. 2011), 271--288. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lasrado, L. A. 2013. Crowdfunding in Finland--A new Alterantive Disruptive Funding Instrument for Business. Tampere University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Lasrado, L. A. and Lugmayr, A. 2013. Crowdfunding in Finland: A New Alternative Disruptive Funding Instrument for Businesses. Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media (2013), 194. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mollick, E. 2014. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing. 29, 1 (2014), 1--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moritz, A. and Block, J. H. 2014. Crowdfunding: A Literature Review and Research Directions. Available at SSRN 2554444. (2014).Google Scholar
- Müllerleile, T. and Joenssen, D. W. 2015. Key Success-Determinants of Crowdfunded Projects: An Exploratory Analysis. Data Science, Learning by Latent Structures, and Knowledge Discovery. Springer. 271--281.Google Scholar
- Petschulat, S. 2010. Other people's data. Communications of the ACM. 53, 1 (Jan. 2010), 53. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Posegga, O., Zylka, M. P. and Fischbach, K. 2015. Collective Dynamics of Crowdfunding Networks. System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on (2015), 3258--3267. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schulz, M., Haas, P., Schulthess, K., Blohm, I. and Leimeister, J. M. 2015. How Idea Creativity and Hedonic Value Influence Project Success in Crowdfunding. (2015).Google Scholar
- Song, A., Lee, H., Ko, M. and Lee, U. 2015. Every Little Helps: Understanding Donor Behavior in a Crowdfunding Platform for Non-profits. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2015), 1103--1108. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tech, R. P. 2014. Crowdfunding Hardware Startups in Germany. (2014).Google Scholar
- Thies, F., Wessel, M. and Benlian, A. 2014. Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Social Buzz and Contribution Behavior within and between Online Platforms--Evidence from Crowdfunding. (2014).Google Scholar
- Vassiliadis, P. 2009. A Survey of Extract--Transform--Load Technology. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining. 5, 3 (33 2009), 1--27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vinoski, S. 2008. Serendipitous Reuse. Internet Computing. January/February 2008 (Feb. 2008), 84--87. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zheng, H., Wan, N., Chen, D. and Wang, T. 2014. Antecedents of Project Implementation Success in Crowdfunding. 18th PACIS, Chengdu, China. (2014), 1--13.Google Scholar
- Zuccalà, M. and Celino, I. 2015. Fostering Innovation Through Coopetition: The E015 Digital Ecosystem. Engineering the Web in the Big Data Era. Springer. 625--628.Google Scholar
- Zvilichovsky, D., Inbar, Y. and Barzilay, O. 2014. Playing both sides of the market: success and reciprocity on crowdfunding platforms. Available at SSRN 2304101. (2014).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Approach for investigating crowdfunding campaigns with platform data: case indiegogo
Recommendations
Factors affecting successful crowdfunding
IC4E '19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-LearningCrowdfunding has been used as one of the effective ways for entrepreneurs to raise funding especially in creative industries. Individuals as well as organizations are paying more attentions to the emergence of new crowdfunding platforms. This research ...
Why people participate in online political crowdfunding: A civic voluntarism perspective
Highlights- This study examines factors influencing intention to participate in political crowdfunding.
AbstractDigital technology allows people to participate in various social activities easily. In politics, online crowdfunding has been gaining attention because it gives politicians benefits to raise political funds from the public. It is also ...
Revenue Management in Crowdfunding
Problem definition: We study the optimal design of crowdfunding campaigns and develop a model that maximizes revenue for a given crowdfunding campaign by optimizing both the pledge level sought from donors and the duration of the campaign. Academic/...
Comments