skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858468acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Challenging the Car Norm: Opportunities for ICT to Support Sustainable Transportation Practices

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The use of practices as a unit of analysis has been suggested in order to scale up efforts within sustainable HCI and to shift the focus from changing individual behaviours to supporting transitions at a societal level. In this paper, we take a practice approach to the case of sustainable transportation, and more specifically to car-free transportation. Car use is intertwined in many practices and managing life without a car is difficult, particularly for people in contexts where owning at least one car per family is the norm. We studied three families in Stockholm who replaced their cars with different combinations of light electric vehicles during one year. From the families' experiences, we identified a number of opportunities for designers of interactive technologies to support environmental pioneers in the particular case of car-free living, as well as to support transitions towards sustainable practices in general.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1300-hasselqvist.mp4

mp4

283 MB

References

  1. Caroline Bartle, Erel Avineri, and Kiron Chatterjee. 2013. Online information-sharing: A qualitative analysis of community, trust and social influence amongst commuter cyclists in the UK. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 16: 60--72. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Maria Börjesson, Jonas Eliasson, Muriel B. Hugosson, and Karin Brundell-Freij. 2012. The Stockholm congestion charges-5 years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt. Transport Policy 20: 1--12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.11.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Efthimios Bothos, Dimitris Apostolou, and Gregoris Mentzas. 2013. Choice Architecture for Environmentally Sustainable Urban Mobility. CHI 2013, 1503--1508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barry Brown, Stuart Reeves, and Scott Sherwood. 2011. Into the Wild: Challenges and Opportunities for Field Trial Methods. CHI 2011, 1657--1666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hrönn Brynjarsdottir, Maria Håkansson, James Pierce, Eric Baumer, Carl Disalvo, and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Sustainably Unpersuaded: How Persuasion Narrows Our Vision of Sustainability. CHI 2012, ACM, 947--956. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Caspar G. Chorus, Eric J. E. Molin, and Bert Van Wee. 2006. Use and Effects of Advanced Traveller Information Services (ATIS): A Review of the Literature. Transport Reviews 26, 2: 127--149. http://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500333677Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. CHI 2010, ACM, 1975--1984. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753625 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. DIS 2010. http://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858173 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Federal Highway Administration. 2010. 2009 National Household Travel Survey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jon Froehlich, Tawanna Dillahunt, Predrag Klasnja, et al. 2009. UbiGreen: Investigating a Mobile Tool for Tracking and Supporting Green Transportation Habits. CHI 2009: 1043--1052. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518861 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Maria Håkansson and Phoebe Sengers. 2013. Beyond Being Green: Simple Living Families and ICT. CHI 2013, 2725--2734. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481378 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Tuillia Jack. 2013. Nobody was dirty: Intervening in inconspicuous consumption of laundry routines. Journal of Consumer Culture 13, 3: 406--421. http://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513485272Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Anna Kramers. 2014. Designing next generation multimodal traveler information systems to support sustainability-oriented decisions. Environmental Modelling and Software 56: 83--93. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lenneke Kuijer and Annelise De Jong. 2009. A practice oriented approach to user centered sustainable design. Ecodesign 2009 Conference, Saporo, Japan: 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lenneke Kuijer and Annelise De Jong. 2012. Identifying design opportunities for reduced household resource consumption: exploring practices of thermal comfort. J. of Design Research 10, 1/2: 67. http://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2012.046140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lenneke Kuijer. 2014. Implications of Social Practice Theory for Sustainable Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kari Kuutti and Lj Bannon. 2014. The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda. CHI 2014, 3543--3552. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557111 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Johanne Mose Entwistle, Mia Kruse Rasmussen, Nervo Verdezoto, Robert S Brewer, and Mads Schaarup Andersen. 2015. Beyond the Individual: The Contextual Wheel of Practice as a Research Framework for Sustainable HCI. CHI 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Åsa Nyblom. 2014. Making plans or "just thinking about the trip"? Understanding people's travel planning in practice. Journal of Transport Geography 35: 30--39. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sebastian Prost, Johann Schrammel, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. "Sometimes it's the weather's fault": sustainable HCI & political activism. CHI 2014, 2005--2010. http://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581358 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kakee Scott, Conny Bakker, and Jaco Quist. 2012. Designing change by living change. Design Studies 33, 3: 279--297. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.08.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Elizabeth Shove, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Elizabeth Shove and Gordon Walker. 2010. Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy 39, 4: 471--476. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jana Sochor, Helena Strömberg, and Marianne Karlsson. 2014. Travelers' motives for adopting a new, innovative travel service: Insights from the UBIGO field operational test in Gothenburg, Sweden. World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yolande Strengers. 2011. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. CHI 2011, ACM Press, 2135--2144. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979252 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Irina Tal, Aida Olaru, and Gabriel Miro Muntean. 2013. eWARPE - Energy-efficient weather-aware route planner for electric bicycles. International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICNP.2013.6733680Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Trafikanalys. 2015. Resvanor. RVU Sverige 20112014 Den nationella resvaneundersökningen. Retrieved August 12, 2015 from http://www.trafa.se/statistik/resvanor/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. John. Urry. 2004. The "System" of Automobility. Theory, Culture & Society 21, 4: 25--39. http://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Bas Verplanken, Henk Aarts, and Ad Van Knippenberg. 1997. Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. European Journal of Social Psychology 27, 5: 539--560. http://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)10990992(199709/10)27:5<539::aid-ejsp831>3.0.co;2-aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Challenging the Car Norm: Opportunities for ICT to Support Sustainable Transportation Practices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader