skip to main content
research-article

Robots, ethics and language

Published:05 January 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Following the classical philosophical definition of ethics and the psychological research on problem solving and decision making, the issue of ethics becomes concrete and opens up the way for the creation of IT systems that can support handling of moral problems. Also in a sense that is similar to the way humans handle their moral problems. The processes of communicating information and receiving instructions are linguistic by nature. Moreover, autonomous and heteronomous ethical thinking is expressed by way of language use. Indeed, the way we think ethically is not only linguistically mediated but linguistically construed -- whether we think for example in terms of conviction and certainty (meaning heteronomy) or in terms of questioning and inquiry (meaning autonomy). A thorough analysis of the language that is used in these processes is therefore of vital importance for the development of the above mentioned tools and methods. Given that we have a clear definition based on philosophical theories and on research on human decision-making and linguistics, we can create and apply systems that can handle ethical issues. Such systems will help us to design robots and to prescribe their actions, to communicate and cooperate with them, to control the moral aspects of robots' actions in real life applications, and to create embedded systems that allow continuous learning and adaptation.

References

  1. {Aristoteles}. 1975. {Nicomachean Ethics}. ({Papyros}).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arkin, R. C. 2009. Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton FL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Fairclough, N. 1995. Media discourse. London. Hodder Arnold.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kant, I. 2006. Grundläggning av sedernas metafysik {Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals}. Daidalos, Stockholm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kavathatzopoulos, I. 1993. Development of a cognitive skill in solving business ethics problems: The effect of instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 379--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kavathatzopoulos, I. 1994. Training professional managers in decision-making about real life business ethics problems: The acquisition of the autonomous problem-solving skill. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 379--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kavathatzopoulos, I. 2004. Making ethical decisions in professional life. In H. Montgomery, R. Lipshitz and B. Brehmer (Eds.), How professionals make decisions (pp. 277--288). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kavathatzopoulos, I. 2014. Independent agents and ethics. In K. Kimppa (Ed.), ICT and society (pp. 39--46). Springer, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kavathatzopoulos, I. and Laaksoharju, M. 2010. Computer aided ethical systems design. In M. Arias-Oliva et al. (Eds.), The "backwards, forwards, and sideways" changes of ICT (pp. 332--340). Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kavathatzopoulos, I. and Laaksoharju, M. 2011. What are ethical agents and how can we make them work properly? In C. Ess and R. Hagengruber (Eds.), The computational turn: Past, presetns, futures? (pp. 151--153). Münster: MV-Wissenschaft.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kavathatzopoulos, I. and Rigas, G. 1998. A Piagetian scale for the measurement of ethical competence in politics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 791--803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kavathatzopoulos, I. and Rigas, G. 2006. A measurement model for ethical competence in business. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 3, 55--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kohlberg. L. 1985. The Just Community: Approach to moral education in theory and practice. In M. Berkowitz and F. Oser (Eds.), Moral education: Theory and application (pp. 27--87). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Laaksoharju, M. and Kavathatzopoulos, I. 2009. Computerized support for ethical analysis. In M. Botti et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of CEPE 2009 -- Eighth International Computer Ethics and Philosophical Enquiry Conference (pp. 425--437). Kerkyra, Greece: Ionian University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Piaget, J. 1932. The moral judgement of the child. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. {Platon}. 1981. {Theaitetos} I. {Zacharopoulos}, {Athens}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. {Platon}. 1992a. {The Republic}. {Kaktos}, {Athens}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. {Platon} 1992b. {Apology of Socrates}. {Kaktos}, {Athens}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sunstein, C. R. 2005. Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 531--573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Wallace, W. and Allen, C. 2009. Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Robots, ethics and language

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
      ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society  Volume 45, Issue 3
      Special Issue on Ethicomp
      September 2015
      446 pages

      Copyright © 2016 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 January 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader