skip to main content
10.1145/2883851.2883946acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

What can analytics contribute to accessibility in e-learning systems and to disabled students' learning?

Published:25 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the potential of analytics for improving accessibility of e-learning and supporting disabled learners in their studies. A comparative analysis of completion rates of disabled and non-disabled students in a large five-year dataset is presented and a wide variation in comparative retention rates is characterized. Learning analytics enable us to identify and understand such discrepancies and, in future, could be used to focus interventions to improve retention of disabled students. An agenda for onward research, focused on Critical Learning Paths, is outlined. This paper is intended to stimulate a wider interest in the potential benefits of learning analytics for institutions as they try to assure the accessibility of their e-learning and provision of support for disabled students.

References

  1. Bean, J. P. & Metzner, B. S., A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55, 4, (1985), 485--540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. British Standards International, BS 8878:2010 Web Accessibility -- Code of Practice. 2010. Available from: http://www.bsi-publications.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, J. P. & Oblinger, D. G., Academic Analytics. Educause, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014). Current state and future trends: a citation analysis of the learning analytics field. LAK 14, Indianapolis, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. HMSO, The Equality Act 2010. Available from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/equalities/equality-act/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. IMS Global Learning Consortium, IMS AccessForAll Metadata Overview. 2004. http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Access for All (AfA), Version 3.0 Specification, Public Draft 1.0. 2012. Available from http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C. L. and Wu, S.-S., Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8, 3, (2005), 221--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nistor, N. & Neubauer, K., From participation to dropout: quantitative participation patterns in online university courses. Computers & Education, 55, 2, (2010), 663--672. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Richardson, J. T. E. (2009): The academic attainment of students with disabilities in UK higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 34:2, 123-137Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Richardson, J. T. E., Course completion and attainment in disabled students taking courses with The Open University UK. Open Learning, 25, 2, (2010), 81--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Romero, C. and Ventura, S., Educational data mining: a survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 1, (2007), 135--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tinto, V., Colleges as communities: taking research on student persistence seriously. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 2, (1997), 167--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. UPIAS, Fundamental Principles of Disability. Union of Physically Impaired against Segregation, London, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wolff, A., Zdrahal, Z., Nikolov, A. & Pantucek, M. (2013) Improving retention: predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment, LAK13, Leuven, Belgium. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. World Health Organization, International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. WHO, Geneva, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. World Health Organization, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHO, Geneva, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. World Wide Web Consortium, Introduction to Web Accessibility. 2005. Available at http://www.w3.org/WAI/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. World Wide Web Consortium, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. 2008. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. What can analytics contribute to accessibility in e-learning systems and to disabled students' learning?

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              LAK '16: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge
              April 2016
              567 pages
              ISBN:9781450341905
              DOI:10.1145/2883851

              Copyright © 2016 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 25 April 2016

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • short-paper

              Acceptance Rates

              LAK '16 Paper Acceptance Rate36of116submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader