skip to main content
10.1145/290941.290947acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 1998Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Abracos, J., and Lopes, G.P. 1997. Statistical methods for retrieving most significant paragraphs in newspaper articles. In Proceedings of the ACL'97/EACL'97 Workshop on intelligent Scalable Text Summarisation (ISTS '97), 51-57. Madrid, Spain, July 11 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandow, R., Mitze, K., and Rau, L.F. 1995. Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection. h#formation Processing & Management 31(5): 675-685, September 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Callan, J.P. I994. Passage-level evidence in document retrieval. In Croft, W.B., and van Rijbergen, C.J. eds. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 302-310. ACM Press, July 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Edmundson, H.P. 1964. Problems in automatic abstracting. Communications of the A CM 7(4):259-263, April 1964. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Edmundson, H.P. 1969. New methods in automatic abstracting. Journal of the ACM 16(2):264-285, April 1969. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hand, T.F. 1997. A proposal for a task-based evaluation of text summarisation systems. In Proceedings of the ACL97/EACL97 Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarisation (ISTS '97), 31-38. Madrid, Spain, July 11 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Harman, D. 1996. Overview of the Filth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-5). In Proceedings of the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5), National {nstitute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs, P.S., and Rau, L.F. 1990. Scisor: Extracting information from on-line news. Communications of the A CM 33(i { ):88-97, November 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Keppel, G. 1973. Design and analysis. A researcher's handbook. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Knaus, D., Mittendorf, E., Schauble, P., and Sheridan, P. 1995. Highlighting relevant passages for users of the interactive SPIDER retrieval system. In Proceedings of the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kupiec, J., Pedersen, J., and Chert, F. 1995. A trainable document summariser. In Fox, E.A., Ingwersen, P., and Fidel, R. eds. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 68-73. ACM Press, July 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Luhn, H.P. 1958. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development 2(2): 159-165, April 1958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Maizel}, R.E., Smith, J.F., and Singer, T.E.R. 1971. Abstracting scientific and technical literature: An introductot#, guide and text for scientists, abstractors and managenzent. New York: Willey-lnterscience, John Willey & Sons Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mani, I., and Bloedorn, E. 1997. Multi-document summarisation by graph search and matching. In Proceedings of AAAI-97, Providence Rhode Island. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. McKeown, K., and Radev, D.R. 1995. Generating summaries from multiple news articles. In Fox, E.A., Ingwersen, P., and Fidel, R. eds. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 74-82. ACM Press, July 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Miike, S., Itoh, E., Ono, K., and Sumita, K. 1994. A full-text retrieval system with a dynamic abstract generation function. In Croft, W.B., and van Rijbergen, C.J. eds. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 152-161. ACM Press, July 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Miller, S. 1984. Experimental design and statistics (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Paice, C.D. 1990. Constructing literature abstracts by computer: Techniques and prospects. Information Processing & Management 26(1 ):171-186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Porter, M.F. 1980. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program - automated librao, and information systems 14(3): 130-137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rush, J.E., Salvador, R., and Zamora, A. 1971. Automatic abstracting and indexing. I!. Production of indicative abstracts by application of contextual inference and syntactic coherence criteria. Jounzal of the American Society for Information Science 22(4):260-274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Salton, G., Singhal, A., Mitra, M., and Buckley, C. 1997. Automatic text structuring and summarisation. Information Processing & Management 33(2):193-20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '98: Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
        August 1998
        394 pages
        ISBN:1581130155
        DOI:10.1145/290941

        Copyright © 1998 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 August 1998

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader