skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998231acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EduFeed: A Social Feed to Engage Preliterate Children in Educational Activities

Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work, we present EduFeed, a system that enables preliterate children to explore an algorithmically-mediated social feed of learning exercises, select activities to engage in, and share them with their peers. We deployed EduFeed as a technology probe to three classrooms of ESL students in the first year of elementary school in India who had limited English literacy and limited experience with touchscreen technology. We found that children were able to self-direct their engagement with the system and were initially motivated by digital sharing, while social context surrounding the system in physical space was also important. Based on our design and probe deployment, we reflect on issues relevant to adapting the social feed paradigm to this context, such as ranking algorithms, physicality, immediacy, and bridging physical and digital collaborative experiences.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

cscwp0271-file3.mp4

mp4

25.1 MB

References

  1. Carlos Alario-Hoyos, Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, Carlos Delgado-Kloos, and Mario Munoz-Organero. 2014. Delving into participants' profiles and use of social tools in MOOCs. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 7, 3 (July 2014) 260--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Saleema Amershi, Meredith Ringel Morris, Neema Moraveji, Ravin Balakrishnan, and Kentaro Toyama. 2010. Multiple mouse text entry for single-display groupware. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 169--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jean Avery. 2009. Mathematics manipulative board. U.S. Patent 7,549,865.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Selami Aydin. 2012. A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development. 60, 6 (December 2012) 1093--1106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jiang Bian, Yandong Liu, Eugene Agichtein, and Hongyuan Zha. 2008. A few bad votes too many?: Towards robust ranking in social media. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web, 53--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Benjamin S. Bloom. 1971. Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery Learning: Theory and Practice, 47--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Edmund Coleman. 2002. Phonemically organized keyboard attached to a speech synthesizer: a machine for teaching the sounds of the letters to young children. U.S. Patent Application 10/212,158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. COPPA Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. 2013. Retrieved May 19, 2016 from www.coppa.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mark A. Donabella and Audrey C. Rule. 2008. Four Seventh Grade Students Who Qualify for Academic Intervention Services in Mathematics Learning MultiDigit Multiplication with the Montessori Checkerboard. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus. 4, 3 (January 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2371--2382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to {her}": Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Helene Gelderblom. 2014. Giving children voice in the design of technology for education in the developing world. South African Computer Journal. 54, (October 2014) 34--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Robert Godwin-Jones. 2005. Emerging technologies: Messaging, gaming, peer-to-peer sharing: Language learning strategies & tools for the millennial generation. Language learning & technology. 9, 1 (January 2005) 17--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, and Motahhare Eslami. 2014. A path to understanding the effects of algorithm awareness. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 631--642. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Caroline Haythornthwaite. 1999. Collaborative work networks among distributed learners. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mohit Jain, Jeremy Birnholtz, Edward Cutrell, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2011. Exploring display techniques for mobile collaborative learning in developing regions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Matthew Kam, Anuj Kumar, Shirley Jain, Akhil Mathur, and John Canny. 2009. Improving literacy in rural India: Cellphone games in an after-school program. In Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD), 139--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Anna Kasunic, Jessica Hammer, Robert Kraut, Michael Massimi, and Amy Ogan. 2016. A Preliminary Look at MOOC-associated Facebook Groups: Prevalence, Geographic Representation, and Homophily. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 205--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Geza Kovacs. 2015. FeedLearn: Using Facebook Feeds for Microlearning. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15), 14511466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kenneth L. Kraemer, Jason Dedrick, and Prakul Sharma. 2009. One laptop per child: vision vs. reality. Communications of the ACM. 52, 6 (June 2009), 66--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Zeina Atrash Leong and Michael S. Horn. 2010. The BEAM: a digitally enhanced balance beam for mathematics education. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 290292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sugata Mitra, Ritu Dangwal, Shiffon Chatterjee, Swati Jha, Ravinder S. Bisht, and Preeti Kapur. 2005. Acquisition of computing literacy on shared public computers: Children and the "hole in the wall." Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 21, 3 (January 2005), 407--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Maria Montessori. 1917. The Montessori elementary material, tr. by A. Livingston. Vol. 2. Frederick A. Stokes Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rabin Patra, Joyojeet Pal, Sergiu Nedevschi, Madelaine Plauche, and Udai Pawar. 2007. Usage models of classroom computing in developing regions. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Udai Singh Pawar, Joyojeet Pal, Rahul Gupta, and Kentaro Toyama. 2007. Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15811590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jean Piaget and Barbel Inhelder. 1972. The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Cynthia A. Rohrbeck, Marika D. Ginsburg-Block, John W. Fantuzzo, and Traci R. Miller. 2003. Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology. 95, 2 (June 2003), 240--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Richard M. Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Selfdetermination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist. 55, 1 (January 2000), 68--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Deborah C. Simmons, Edward J. Kame'enui, Mike Stoolmiller, Mike Coyne, and Beth Harn. 2003. Accelerating growth and maintaining proficiency: A two-year intervention study of kindergarten and firstgrade children at risk for reading difficulties. Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale, 197--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ellen A. Skinner and Michael J. Belmont. 1993. Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology. 85, 4 (December 1993), 571--581.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Pippa Stein. 2000. Rethinking resources in the ESL classroom: Rethinking resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 34, 2 (June 2000), 333--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Deborah J. Stipek. 1996. Motivation and instruction. In David C. Berliner and Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, 85--113. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Indrani Medhi Thies. 2015. User Interface Design for Low-literate and Novice Users: Past, Present and Future. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8, 1 (March 2015), 1--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Lev S. Vygotsky. 1980. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Kathryn R. Wentzel. 1999. Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology. 91, 1 (March 1999), 76--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. XPRIZE Foundation. Global Learning XPRIZE Overview. 2016. Retrieved July 7, 2015 from http://learning.xprize.org/about/overviewGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Gustavo Zurita and Miguel Nussbaum. 2004. Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education. 42, 3 (April 2004), 289--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Gustavo Zurita, Miguel Nussbaum, and Mike Shaples. 2003. Encouraging face-to-face collaborative learning through the use of handheld computers in the classroom. In Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, 193--208. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. EduFeed: A Social Feed to Engage Preliterate Children in Educational Activities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      February 2017
      2556 pages
      ISBN:9781450343350
      DOI:10.1145/2998181

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate183of530submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader