skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025707acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of Frequency Distribution on Linear Menu Performance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

While it is well known that menu usage follows a Zipfian distribution, there has been little interest in the impact of menu item frequency distribution on user's behavior. In this note, we explore the effects of frequency distribution on average menu performance as well as individual item performance. We compare three frequency distributions of menu item usage: Uniform; Zipfian with s=1 and Zipfian with s=2. The results show that (1) user's behavior is sensitive to different frequency distributions at both menu and item level; (2) individual item selection time depends on, not only its frequency, but also the frequency of other items in the menu. Finally, we discuss how these findings might have impacts on menu design, empirical studies and menu modeling.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn2288p.mp4

mp4

785.6 KB

References

  1. Caroline Appert and Shumin Zhai. 2009. Using Strokes As Command Shortcuts: Cognitive Benefits and Toolkit Support. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2289--2298. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519052 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gilles Bailly, Antti Oulasvirta, Duncan P. Brumby, and Andrew Howes. 2014. Model of Visual Search and Selection Time in Linear Menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3865--3874. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557093 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Suresh K. Bhavnani, Bonnie E. John, and Ulrich Flemming. 1999. The strategic use of CAD: an empirically inspired, theory-based course. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 183--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Michael D. Byrne, John R. Anderson, Scott Douglass, and Michael Matessa. 1999. Eye Tracking the Visual Search of Click-down Menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 402--409. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/302979.303118 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Xiuli Chen, Gilles Bailly, Duncan P. Brumby, Antti Oulasvirta, and Andrew Howes. 2015. The Emergence of Interactive Behavior: A Model of Rational Menu Search. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4217--4226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702483 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, and Saul Greenberg. 2007. A Predictive Model of Menu Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 627--636. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240723 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, Joey Scarr, and Sylvain Malacria. 2014. Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 2, Article 31 (Nov. 2014), 36 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2659796 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Stephen R. Ellis and Robert J. Hitchcock. 1986. The emergence of Zipf's law: Spontaneous encoding optimization by users of a command language. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics 16, 3 (1986), 423--427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2004. A Comparison of Static, Adaptive, and Adaptable Menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 89--96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/985692.985704 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Saul Greenberg and Ian H. Witten. 1993. Supporting command reuse: empirical foundations and principles. (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tovi Grossman, Pierre Dragicevic, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2007. Strategies for Accelerating On-line Learning of Hotkeys. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1591--1600. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240865 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Stephen José Hanson, Robert E. Kraut, and James M. Farber. 1984. Interface design and multivariate analysis of UNIX command use. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 2, 1 (1984), 42--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. William E. Hick. 1952. On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 4, 1 (1952), 11--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Andrew Howes, Stephen J. Payne, and Amelia Woodward. 2000. The Trouble with Shortcuts. In CHI '00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 267--268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/633292.633448 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ray Hyman. 1953. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of experimental psychology 45, 3 (1953), 188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gordon Kurtenbach and William Buxton. 1993. The Limits of Expert Performance Using Hierarchic Marking Menus. In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '93). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 482--487. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/169059.169426 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Roy Lachman, Janet L. Lachman, and Earl C. Butterfield. 2015. Cognitive psychology and information processing: An introduction. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dong-Seok Lee and Wan Chul Yoon. 2004. Quantitative results assessing design issues of selection-supportive menus. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 33, 1 (2004), 41--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Justin Matejka, Wei Li, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2009. CommunityCommands: command recommendations for software applications. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Brad Mehlenbacher, Thomas M. Duffy, and James Palmer. 1989. Finding information on a menu: linking menu organization to the user's goals. Human-Computer Interaction 4, 3 (1989), 231--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Erik L. Nilsen. 1996. Perceptual-Motor Control in Human-Computer Interaction. Technical Report. DTIC Document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Stephen J. Payne and Andrew Howes. 2013. Adaptive interaction: A utility maximization approach to understanding human interaction with technology. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 6, 1 (2013), 1--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Peter Pirolli. 2007. Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with information. Oxford University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Andrew Sears and Ben Shneiderman. 1994. Split Menus: Effectively Using Selection Frequency to Organize Menus. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 1, 1 (March 1994), 27--51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/174630.174632 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tim Wifall, Eliot Hazeltine, and J. Toby Mordkoff. 2015. The roles of stimulus and response uncertainty in forced-choice performance: an amendment to Hick/Hyman Law. Psychological research (2015), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Effects of Frequency Distribution on Linear Menu Performance

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader