Carlos Alberto Joia Lazarin
ABSTRACT
Geographically distributed stakeholder's participation in the software development process is usually limited either by budget issues or by time constraints. Those limitations are more severe regarding to modeling web-based applications. Despite of the benefits related to people's empowerment in the decision making process, most of Participatory Design (PD) techniques are limited by the fact of demanding co-located practices. We conducted two participatory workshops to gather requirements for a distributed PD web-based groupware system that will support the adoption of BrainDraw in scenarios that stakeholders are geographically distributed. As results we present requirements, wireframes and some adjustments proposed by the workshops' audience about conducting BrainDraw through a web-based groupware system.
- Ackerman, M. S. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Journal Human-Computer Interaction, v. 15, n. 2, p. 179--203. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Almeida, L. D. A.; Neris, V. P. A.; Miranda, L. C. de; Hayashi, E. C. S.; Baranauskas, M. C. C. 2009. Designing Inclusive Social Networks: A Participatory Approach. In: HCI International, 2009, San Diego. Lecture Notes in Computer Science - Online Communities and Social Computing. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009. v. 5621. p. 653--662. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beynon, M. and Chan, Z. E. 2006. A conception of computing technology better suited to distributed participatory design. NordiCHI Workshop on Distributed Participatory Design, p. 1--4.Google Scholar
- Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. 1995. User participation and democracy: A discussion of Scandinavian research on system development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, v. 7, n. 1, p. 73--98. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boy, G. A. 1997. The Group Elicitation Method for Participatory Design and Usability Testing. Magazine interactions, v. 4, n. 2, p. 27--33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Danielsson, K., Naghsh, A. M., Gumm, D. and Warr, A. 2008. Distributed Participatory Design. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '08), p. 3953. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dray, S. M. 1992. Understanding and supporting successful group work in software design: Lessons from IDS {Position paper}. In I. Karat and I. Bennett, (Chairs), Understanding and supporting successful group work in software design. Workshop at CSCW '92 conference, Toronto.Google Scholar
- Grudin, J. 1994. Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Magazine Communications of the ACM, v. 37, n. 1, p. 92--105 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heintz, M., Law, E. L., Govaerts, S., Holzer, A. e Gillet, D. 2014. Pdot: Participatory Design Online Tool. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kensing, F.; Blomberg, J. 1998. Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), v. 7, n. 1993, p. 167--185. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kensing, F.; Greenbaum, J. 2013. Heritage: Having a say. In: Simonsen J; Robertson T. (Ed). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York, NY: Routledge, 2013.p. 21--37.Google Scholar
- Lafrenière, D. 1996. CUTA: A Simple, Practical, Low-Cost Approach to Task Analysis. Magazine Interactions, v. 3, n. 5, p. 35--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lohmann, S., Ziegler, J. and Heim, P. 2008. Involving End Users in Distributed Requirements Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), v. 5247 LNCS, p. 221--228. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matsunaga, R. M., de Oliveira Moraes, R. L., Borges, M. A. F., Matta, M. A. P. Ozelo, M. C. 2014. Development of a serious game for children with hemophilia. Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), 2014 IEEE 3rd International Conference on, Rio de Janeiro, p. 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Muller, M., Hallewell, J. e Dayton, T. 1997. Participatory Practices in the Software Lifecycle. In: Helander, M. G.; Landauer, T. K.; Prabhu, P. V.{Orgs.}. Handbook of human-computer interaction. Second ed. North-Holland: Elsevier Science B.V. p. 256--300.Google Scholar
- Muller, M. J. 2003. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, v. 4235, p. 1051--1068. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Muller, M., Muller, J., Wildman, M., White, E. A. e Technologies, U. S. W. 1994. Participatory Design through Games and Other Group Exercises. In CHI'94 - Celebrating Interdependence. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neris, V. P. de A., Baranauskas, M. C. C. 2012. Designing tailorable software systems with the users' participation. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, v. 18, n. 3, p. 2013--227.Google Scholar
- Näkki, P., Antikainen, M. and Virtanen, T. 2008. Participatory Design in an Open Web Laboratory Owela. In Distributed Participatory Design Workshop, CHI 2008.Google Scholar
- Prante, T., Magerkurth, C. e Streitz, N. 2002. Developing CSCW Tools for Idea Finding -- Empirical Results and Implications for Design. Cscw'02, n. Cscw, p. 106--115 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reyes, L. F. M. and Finken, S. 2012. Social Media as a platform for Participatory Design. Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Exploratory Papers Workshop Descriptions Industry Cases, PDC '12, v. 2, p. 89. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, Y., Sharp H., Preece J. 2013. Design de Interação: Além da Interação Humano-Computador. Bookman, 2013. 3 eds. p. 352--353.Google Scholar
- Sanders, E. B.-N., Brandt, E. and Binder, T. 2010. A Framework for Organizing the Tools and Techniques of Participatory Design. PDC 2010 - Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, p. 195--198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simonsen J; Robertson T. 2013. Participatory Design: An introduction. In: Simonsen J; Robertson T. (Ed). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York, NY: Routledge, 2013.p. 1--18.Google Scholar
- Spinuzzi, C. 2005. The Methodology of Participatory Design. Technical Communication, v. 52, n. 2, p. 163--174.Google Scholar
- Tudor, L. G., Muller, M. j., Dayton, T., and Root, R. W. 1993. A participatory design technique for high- level task analysis, critique, and redesign: The CARD method. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, 295--299.Google Scholar
- Tschudy, M.W., Dykstra-Erickson, E.A., and Holloway, M.S. 1996. PictureCARD: A storytelling tool for task analysis. In PDC'96 Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, 183--191.Google Scholar
- Walsh, G., Druin, A., Guha, M., et al. 2010. Layered elaboration: a new technique for co-design with children. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 1237--1240. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Distributed Participatory Design web-based groupware: gathering requirements through BrainDraw
Recommendations
Distributed participatory design
CHI EA '08: CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOver the years a consensus has developed that involving users directly in the software development process can lead to more useful and usable systems. This has found its clearest expression in the Participatory Design (PD) movement. However, a ...
The role of design fiction in participatory design processes
NordiCHI '18: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer InteractionParticipatory design is in essence very malleable as any design technique could lend itself to it, as long as users and stakeholders are involved. Design fictions however, have more often been used as either a vehicle for critical designs, or as a sheer ...
TelePICTIVE groupware for collaborative GUI design
CHI '92: Posters and Short Talks of the 1992 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe design of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) requires collaborative effort by a group of diverse co-designers. This group is typically constrained to meet in the same time and place. In this poster, we describe TelePICTIVE, an experimental groupware ...
Comments