skip to main content
10.1145/3059454.3059471acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Strategies of Free-Form Web Curation: Processes of Creative Engagement with Prior Work

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We synthesize principles across art, design, writing, and psychology to articulate strategies of free-form web curation, for stimulating students' creative engagement with prior work, in performance of ideation tasks. We manifest the strategies in an interactive system and pedagogy. Free-form web curation is a form of new media--designed to enable users to conceptualize and create new contexts--in which they discover, interpret, and represent relationships, by composing readymade and self-made content elements. The strategies are Collect, Assemble, Shift Perspective, Sketch, Write, and Exhibit. We conducted a field study involving 1247 students over 4 semesters. We connect visual, quantitative, and experiential data to show how students engage with prior work through the free-form web curation strategies, system, and pedagogy. We develop implications for design of web curation systems and education. We coalesce a theory of free-form web curation, based on the strategies, emphasizing the roles of space and context.

References

  1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., and Silverstein, M. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Center for Environmental Structure Berkeley, Calif. OUP USA, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, S. From object to field+ architecture and urbanism. Architectural design, 127 (1997), 24--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnheim, R. Visual Thinking. University of California Press, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthes, R. S/z, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill and Wang, 1974) 76 (1974).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bederson, B. B., Meyer, J., and Good, L. Jazz: An extensible zoomable user interface graphics toolkit in java. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '00 (2000), 171--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Benford, S., and Giannachi, G. Performing mixed reality. The MIT Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bernstein, M. Collage, composites, construction. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (2003), 122--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Blank, S., and Dorf, B. The startup owner's manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolter, J. D. Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Braxton, A. Tri-axium writings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cage, J. Silence: lectures and writings. Wesleyan University Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Carson, S. H., Fama, J., Clancy, K., Ebert, J., and Tierney, A. Writing for Psychology. Harvard University, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chesbrough, H. Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (2006), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Clapton, E., Baker, G., Winwood, S., and Grech, R. Blind Faith. Polydor Records, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Colleged, H. A Student's Guide to Reading and Writing in Social Anthropology. Harvard University, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Coltrane, J. A. A Love Supreme. MCA Records, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Corajoud, M. L'horizon. Face (Mars 2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. De Landa, M. A thousand years of nonlinear history. Zone Books New York, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Derieux, F., and Aubart, F. Harald Szeemann: Individual Methodology. JRP Ringier, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Derrida, J. Of grammatology. JHU Press, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. documenta und Museum Fridericianum gGmbH. documenta 5 - Retrospective. 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Dontcheva, M., Drucker, S. M., Salesin, D., and Cohen, M. F. Relations, cards, and search templates: User-guided web data integration and layout. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2007), 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Eames, C., and Eames, R. Powers of ten {motion picture}. USA: IBM (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Facebook. Newsroom, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischer, G. Beyond "couch potatoes": From consumers to designers. In IEEE Proceedings Computer Human Interaction. 3rd Asia Pacific. (1998), 2--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Foucault, M. The archaeology of knowledge. Vintage, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Garcia, J., Lesh, P., Weir, B., McKernan, P., Kreutzmann, B., Godchaux, K., Godchaux, D., and Hunter, R. Europe '72 - Grateful Dead. Warner Bros. Records, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Giaccardi, E., and Karana, E. Foundations of materials experience: An approach for hci. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI (2015), 2447--2456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Goldschmidt, G. The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal 4, 2 (1991), 123--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Habermas, J. Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison, S., and Dourish, P. Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (1996), 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hays, W. L. Statistics, fourth edition. Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Hendrix, J. Are You Experienced. Track Records, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Higgins, D., and Higgins, H. Intermedia. Leonardo 34, 1 (2001), 49--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., and Norman, D. A. Direct manipulation interfaces. Human--Computer Interaction 1, 4 (1985), 311--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Huynh, D., Mazzocchi, S., and Karger, D. Piggy Bank: Experience the Semantic Web inside your web browser. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5, 1 (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Interface Ecology Lab. IdeaMâché. https://ideamache.ecologylab.net/, 2013--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones, W., Dumais, S., and Bruce, H. Once found, what then? a study of "keeping" behaviors in the personal use of web information. In Proc. American Society for Information Science and Technology 39, 1 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Kerne, A. Concept-context-design: A creative model for the development of interactivity. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity & cognition (2002), 192--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Kerne, A., Mistrot, J. M., Khandelwal, M., Sundaram, V., and Koh, E. Using composition to re-present personal collections of hypersigns. Proc Computational Semiotics in Games and New Media (COSIGN) (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Kerne, A., Qu, Y., Webb, A. M., Damaraju, S., Lupfer, N., and Mathur, A. Meta-metadata: A metadata semantics language for collection representation applications. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM (2010), 1129--1138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Kerne, A., and Sundaram, V. A recombinant information space. Proc Computational Semiotics in Games and New Media (COSIGN) (2003), 48--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Kerne, A., Webb, A. M., Smith, S. M., Linder, R., Lupfer, N., Qu, Y., Moeller, J., and Damaraju, S. Using metrics of curation to evaluate information-based ideation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 21, 3 (June 2014), 14:1--14:48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Kolko, J. Information architecture and design strategy: The importance of synthesis during the process of design. In Industrial Designers Society of America Conference 2007 (2007), 17--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Konecki, K. T. Visual grounded theory: A methodological outline and examples from empirical work. Revija za sociologiju 41, 2 (2011), 131--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Krauss, R. E. The optical unconscious. MIT press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Kurtenbach, G., and Buxton, W. User learning and performance with marking menus. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI (1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The journal of Philosophy 77, 8 (1980), 453--486.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Landow, G. P. Hypertext 3.0: Critical theory and new media in an era of globalization. JHU Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Larkin, J. H., and Simon, H. A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 1 (1987), 65--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Lin, Y.-S. Fostering creativity through education-a conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative education 2, 3 (2011), 149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Linder, R., Lupfer, N., Kerne, A., Webb, A. M., Hill, C., Qu, Y., Keith, K., Carrasco, M., and Kellogg, E. Beyond slideware: How a free-form presentation medium stimulates free-form thinking in the classroom. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (2015), 285--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Linder, R., Snodgrass, C., and Kerne, A. Everyday ideation: All of my ideas are on pinterest. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI (2014), 2411--2420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Lippard, L. Dadas on Art. Spectrum Book. Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Lippard, L. R. Six years: the dematerialization of the art object from 1966 to 1972..., vol. 364. Univ of California Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Lupfer, N., Kerne, A., Webb, A. M., and Linder, R. Patterns of free-form curation: Visual thinking with web content. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Multimedia (2016), 12--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Manovich, L. The language of new media. MIT press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Marchionini, G. Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM 49, 4 (2006), 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Marshall, C. C. Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (1998), 40--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Marshall, C. C., and Shipman III, F. M. Spatial hypertext: designing for change. Communications of the ACM 38, 8 (1995), 88--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. McCain, M. This meryl streep speech is why trump won. Twitter (January 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Merleau-Ponty, M., and Smith, C. Phenomenology of perception. Motilal Banarsidass Publishe, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Miller, P. D. Rhythm science. MIT Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Takada, S., and Reeves, B. N. Two-dimensional spatial positioning as a means for reflection in design. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS '00 (2000), 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. National Academy of Engineering. Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5. National Academy Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Nelson, T. H. Computer Lib/Dream Machines. Distributors, June 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. O'Neill, P. The Culture of Curating and the Curating of Culture (s). MIT Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Ong, W. J. Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture. Cornell University Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Oxford University Press. The Oxford English Dictionary. http://ww.oed.com, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Palmer, S. E. Perceptual organization in vision. Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Paul, C. New media in the white cube and beyond: Curatorial models for digital art. Univ of California Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Perlin, K., and Fox, D. Pad: An alternative approach to the computer interface. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH (1993), 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Pook, S., Lecolinet, E., Vaysseix, G., and Barillot, E. Control menus: Excecution and control in a single interactor. In CHI '00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA (2000), 263--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Pop, A. How to Do Things with Pictures: A Guide to Writing in Art History. Harvard University, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Prince, and The Revolution. Purple Rain. Warner Bros. Records, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Qu, Y., Kerne, A., Lupfer, N., Linder, R., and Jain, A. Metadata type system: Integrate presentation, data models and extraction to enable exploratory browsing interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, EICS (2014), 107--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Rittel, H. W., and Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4, 2 (1973), 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Rogers, Y. Hci theory: classical, modern, and contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 5, 2 (2012), 1--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Rosenbaum, S. Curation Nation: How to Win in a World Where Consumers are Creators. McGraw-Hill, Feb. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Rosenberg, J. And and: conjunctive hypertext and the structure acteme juncture. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (2001), 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Russell, D. M., Stefik, M. J., Pirolli, P., and Card, S. K. The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proceedings of the INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 conference on Human factors in computing systems (1993), 269--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Schechner, R. Environmental Theater. Acting Series. Applause, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Schön, D. A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, vol. 5126. Basic books, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. schraefel, m. c., Wigdor, D., Zhu, Y., and Modjeska, D. Hunter gatherer: Within-web-page collection making. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '02 (2002), 826--827. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Seitz, W. C. the art of assemblage. Museum of Modern Art New York, 1961.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Sellen, A. J., and Harper, R. H. The myth of the paperless office. MIT press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Shah, J., Smith, S., and Vargas-Hernandez, N. Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24, 2 (2002), 111--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M. S., and Jacobs, S. M. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Society of Independent Artists. Catalogue of the first annual exhibition, 1917.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Spies, W. Max Ernst Collages: The Invention of the Surrealist Universe. Harry N Abrams Incorporated, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Stein, G. Everybody's autobiography. Vintage, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Stoan, S. K. Research and library skills: An analysis and interpretation. College & research libraries 45, 2 (1984), 99--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Stolterman, E., and Wiberg, M. Concept-driven interaction design research. Human--Computer Interaction 25, 2 (2010), 95--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Streep, M. Speech at the golden globes. YouTube (January 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Trump, D. J. Meryl streep, one of the most over-rated actresses in hollywood. Twitter (January 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Tversky, B. Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science 3, 3 (2011), 499--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  98. Watson, J. Rapper's delight: A billion-dollar industry. Forbes Feb 18 (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Webb, A. M., Linder, R., Kerne, A., Lupfer, N., Qu, Y., Poffenberger, B., and Revia, C. Promoting reflection and interpretation in education: Curating rich bookmarks as information composition. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (2013), 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Wilkenfeld, M. J., and Ward, T. B. Similarity and emergence in conceptual combination. Journal Memory and Language 45 (2001), 21--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Yankelovich, N., Haan, B. J., Meyrowitz, N. K., and Drucker, S. M. Intermedia: The concept and the construction of a seamless information environment. Computer 21, 1 (1988), 81--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in hci. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (2007), 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Strategies of Free-Form Web Curation: Processes of Creative Engagement with Prior Work

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        C&C '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition
        June 2017
        584 pages
        ISBN:9781450344036
        DOI:10.1145/3059454
        • General Chairs:
        • David A. Shamma,
        • Jude Yew,
        • Program Chair:
        • Brian Bailey

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 June 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        C&C '17 Paper Acceptance Rate27of94submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader