skip to main content
10.1145/2466627.2466636acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Promoting reflection and interpretation in education: curating rich bookmarks as information composition

Published:17 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Reflection, interpretation, and curation play key roles in learning, creativity, and problem solving. Reflection means looking back and forward among building blocks constituting a space of ideas, contextualizing with processes including tasks, activities, and one's internal thinking and meditating, and deriving new understandings, known as interpretations. Curation, in the digital age, means searching, gathering, collecting, organizing, designing, reflecting on, and interpreting information.

We introduce rich bookmarks, representations of key ideas from documents as navigable links that integrate visual clippings and rich semantic metadata. We support curating rich bookmarks as information composition. In this holistic visual form, curators express relationships among curated elements through implicit visual features, such as spatial position, color, and translucence.

We investigated the situated context of a university course, engaging educators in iterative co-design. Rich bookmarks emerged in the process, motivating changes in pedagogy and software. Changes provoked students to collect more novel and varied ideas. They reported that curating rich bookmarks as information composition helped them reflect, transforming prior ideas into new ones. The visual component of rich bookmarks was found to support multiple interpretations; the semantic to support associational exploration of related ideas.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. Working memory. Clarendon Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateman, S., Teevan, J., and White, R. W. The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior. In Proc CHI (2012), 1785--1794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Beale, R. Blogs, reflective practice and student-centered learning. In Proc BCS-HCI (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bødker, S. A human activity approach to user interfaces. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, 3 (Sept. 1989), 171--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brown, A. L. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2, 2 (1992), 141--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Burke, M. Organization of Multimedia Resources. Gower, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, E. A., Latulipe, C., Fung, R., and Terry, M. Creativity factor evaluation: towards a standardized survey metric for creativity support. In Proc. C&C (2009), 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher 32, 1 (2003), 9--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Collins, A. Toward a design science of education, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Constine, J. Pinterest hits 10 million u.s. monthly uniques faster than any standalone site ever. http://techcrunch.com/2012/02/07/pinterest-monthly-uniques.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Coughlan, T., and Johnson, P. Interaction in creative tasks. In Proc. CHI (2006), 531--540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fosnot, C. Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. Teachers College Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proc. CHI (2003), 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hegel, G., and Baillie, J. The Phenomenology of Spirit (The Phenomenology of Mind). Lightning Source Incorporated, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Illich, I. Tools for conviviality. World perspectives. Harper & Row, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kerne, A., Qu, Y., Webb, A. M., Damaraju, S., Lupfer, N., and Mathur, A. Meta-metadata: a metadata semantics language for collection representation applications. In Proc. CIKM (2010), 1129--1138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kerne, A., Webb, A. M., Smith, S. M., Moeller, J., Damaraju, S., Lupfer, N., and Qu, Y. Components of information-based ideation productivity. submitted to ToCHI (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Marshall, C. C., Shipman, III, F. M., and Coombs, J. H. Viki: spatial hypertext supporting emergent structure. In Proc. ECHT (1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mendels, P., Frens, J., and Overbeeke, K. Freed: a system for creating multiple views of a digital collection during the design process. In CHI (2011), 1481--1490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge Classics. Taylor & Francis, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mezirow, J. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: a guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Takada, S., and Reeves, B. N. Two-dimensional spatial positioning as a means for reflection in design. In Proc. DIS (2000), 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pinterest, 2012. http://pinterest.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenbaum, S. Curation Nation: How to Win in a World Where Consumers are Creators. McGraw-Hill, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Scaife, M., and Rogers, Y. External cognition: how do graphical representations work? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 45, 2 (Aug. 1996), 185--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., Vargas-Hernandez, N., Gerkins, D., and Wulan, M. Empirical studies of design ideation: Alignment of design experiments with lab experiments. In Proc ASME Conf on Design Theory and Methodology (2003), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sharmin, M., and Bailey, B. P. "i reflect to improve my design": investigating the role and process of reflection in creative design. In Proc. C&C (2011), 389--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Suchman, L. A. Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Teevan, J., Cutrell, E., Fisher, D., Drucker, S. M., Ramos, G., André, P., and Hu, C. Visual snippets: summarizing web pages for search and revisitation. In CHI (2009), 2023--2032. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tufte, E. R. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Webb, A. M., and Kerne, A. Integrating implicit structure visualization with authoring promotes ideation. In Proc. JCDL (2011), 203--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Woodruff, A., Faulring, A., Rosenholtz, R., Morrsion, J., and Pirolli, P. Using thumbnails to search the web. In Proc CHI (2001), 198--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Zarro, M., Hall, C., and Forte, A. Wedding dresses and wanted criminals: Pinterest. com as an infrastructure for repository building. In Proc. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Promoting reflection and interpretation in education: curating rich bookmarks as information composition

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '13: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition
      June 2013
      433 pages
      ISBN:9781450321501
      DOI:10.1145/2466627

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 June 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      C&C '13 Paper Acceptance Rate28of88submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader