Olga Filatova
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the results of an e-Participation study of Eurasian Economic Union member states. The websites of each country's key ministries served as the object of the research. The original research methodology used in this paper is based on the UN e-Participation Index approach. Obtained data allows to rank EEU member countries by the level of electronic participation and to propose recommendations for further improvements in public engagement.
- Alarabiat, A., Sá Soares, D., Estevez, E. 2016. Electronic Participation with a Special Reference to Social Media - A Literature Review. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016. Published by Springer International t Publishing Switzerland 2016. E. Tambouris et al. (Eds.): ePart 2016, LNCS 9821, 41--52. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bolgov, R., Karachay V. 2016. E-Governance Institutions Development in the Eurasian Economic Union: Case of the Russian Federation // ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2016; Montevideo; Uruguay. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bershadskaya, L., Chugunov, A., Trutnev, D. 2013. E-Participation Development: A Comparative Study of the Russian, USA and UK E-Petition Initiatives. In: Proceedings of International Conference ICEGOV 2013 ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chugunov A., Filatova O., Misnikov Y. Citizens' deliberation online as will-formation: the impact of online media identity discourse outcomes in Russia. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. V. 9821. Springer Verlag, 2016. P.67--82. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chugunov A., Filatova O., Misnikov Y. 2016. Online Discourse as a Microdemocracy Tool: Towards New Discursive Epistemics for Policy Deliberation. In ICEGOV '16 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Citizens as Partners: OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making. 2001. OECD Publishing, Paris. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Concept paper Developing capacity for participatory governance through e-participation. 2013. DPADM : http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/internet/Documents/CONCEPT%20PAPER%20e-Participation%2001.30.13.pdf.Google Scholar
- E-Participation Index. URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/About/Overview/E-ParticipationGoogle Scholar
- Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.A. 2008. A domain model for eParticipation. In: Mellouk, A., Bi, J., Ortiz, G., et al. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, pp. 25--30. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Macintosh, A. 2004. Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In: Proceedings of the 37th HICSS. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos. http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/05/205650117a.pdf. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Macintosh, A. 2006. eParticipation in policy-making. The research and the challenges, exploiting the knowledge economy: issues, applications, case studies. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., Schneeberger, A. 2009. eParticipation: The research gaps. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 5694 LNCS, 1--11.Google Scholar
- Macnamara, J. 2010. The quadrivium of online public consultation: Policy, culture, resources, technology. Australian Journal of Political Science. 45, 2, 227--244. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Measuring and Evaluating e-Participation (METEP): Assessment of Readiness at the Country Level. In UNPAN Internet Site. http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/METEP%20framework_18%20Jul_MOST%20LATEST%20Version.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Measuring and Evaluating e-Participation (METEP): Assessment of Readiness at the Country Level (in russian). In UNPAN Internet Site. http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN93719.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Medaglia, R. 2012. eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006--2011). Government Information Quarterly 29, 346--360. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Medaglia, R. 2007. The challenged identity of a field: the state of the art of eParticipation research. Inf. Polity 12, 169--181.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Misnikov, Y. 2015. Understanding eParticipation. Presentation on E-Participation Workshop in Kenya. Nairobi, 13--16 January 2015. http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/Understanding%20EP%20-%20Yuri.pptx.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K. 2009. 'eParticipation initiatives: How is Europe progressing? ', European Journal of ePractice, No. 7, March 2009: http://www.epractice.eu/files/7.2.pdf.Google Scholar
- Porwol, L., Ojo, A., Breslin, J.G. 2016. An ontology for next generation e-participation initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prosser, A. 2013. eParticipation on the European Union Level. Technology-Enabled Innovation for Democracy, Government and Governance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1--8.Google Scholar
- Sanford, C., Rose, J. 2007. Characterizing eParticipation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 27, 406--421. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., Flak, L.S. 2008. The shape of eParticipation. Characterizing an emerging research area. Gov. Inf. Q. 25(3), 400--428. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scherer, S., Wimmer, M. 2016. A Metamodel for the E-Participation. In IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016. Published by Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 E. Tambouris et al. (Eds.): ePart 2016, LNCS 9821, 3--16. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, S., Macintosh, A., Millard, J. 2011. A three-layered framework for evaluating e-participation. Int. J. Electron. Gov. 4(4), 304--321 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susha, I., Gronlund, A. 2012. eParticipation research: Systematizing the field. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (2012), 373--382. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tambouris, E., Kalampokis, E., Tarabanis, K. 2008. A survey of e-participation research projects in the European Union Int. J. Electron. Bus. (IJEB) 6(6), 554 - 571. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. In General Assembly of The United Nations. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=EDevelopmentGoogle Scholar
- UNDESA's overview of e-participation models. 2006. Prepared by Nahleen Ahmed, DPADM. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan023622.pdfGoogle Scholar
- United Nations E-Government Survey 2016. E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. UNITED NATIONS New York, 2016. publicadministration.un.org http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN96407.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Wimmer, M.A. 2007. Ontology for an e-participation virtual resource centre. In: Janowski, T., Pardo, T.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 89--98. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- e-participation in EEU countries: a case study of government websites
Recommendations
Reframing E-participation for Sustainable Development
ICEGOV '21: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceThe role of digital technologies in the public administration has grown significantly in the last five decades, with over 80% of United Nations Member States currently using technologies for public governance processes. This trend has contributed to ...
Electronic Citizens Participation: Systematic Review
ICEGOV '15-16: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceCitizen participation is considered as one of the core elements of transparency of Governments with regard to their citizens. In these participations, Governments generally ask people to give their opinions with regard to particular subjects. ...
E-Government in the Eurasian Economic Union: A comparative study of member states
ICEGOV '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceThis paper presents selected results of a comparative e-government study of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) member states. The study analyses each country's key ministry websites and open government data sources. The research uses a version of the UN ...
Comments