skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3174000acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Jetto: Using Lateral Force Feedback for Smartwatch Interactions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interacting with media and games is a challenging user experience on smartwatches due to their small screens. We propose using lateral force feedback to enhance these experiences. When virtual objects on the smartwatch display visually collide or push the edge of the screen, we add haptic feedback so that the user also feels the impact. This addition creates the illusion of a virtual object that is physically hitting or pushing the smartwatch, from within the device itself. Using this approach, we extend virtual space and scenes into a 2D physical space. To create realistic lateral force feedback, we first examined the minimum change in force magnitude that is detectable by users in different directions and weight levels, finding an average JND of 49% across all tested conditions, with no significant effect of weight and force direction. We then developed a proof-of-concept hardware prototype called Jetto and demonstrated its unique capabilities through a set of impact-enhanced videos and games. Our preliminary user evaluations indicated the concept was welcomed and is regarded as a worthwhile addition to smartwatch output and media experiences.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn3573-file3.mp4

mp4

87.5 MB

pn3573-file5.mp4

mp4

9.4 MB

pn3573.mp4

mp4

216.7 MB

References

  1. Apple Watch survey finds most customers plan to buy more bands, third-party interest increasing. 2015. Retrieved August 20, 2017 from https://9to5mac.com/2015/11/03/apple-watch-bandsurvey/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Flexible SmartWatch display by SmartSound Case Inc. 2013. Retrieved August 20, 2017 from http://www.smartsoundcase.com/portfolioview/smartwatch-flexible-display-panel-for-apple-bysmartsound-case-inc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lenovo flexible Phone. 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2017 from https://www.cnet.com/news/lenovo-showsoff-superflexible-phone-you-wear-like-a-watch/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nintendo Switch. 2017. Retrieved August 15, 2017 from https://www.nintendo.com/switch/presentation2017/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jessalyn Alvina, Shengdong Zhao, Simon T. Perrault, Maryam Azh, Thijs Roumen and Morten Fjeld. 2015. OmniVib: Towards Cross-body Spatiotemporal Vibrotactile Notifications for Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15), 24872496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tomohiro Amemiya, Hideyuki Ando and Taro Maeda. 2008. Lead-me interface for a pulling sensation from hand-held devices. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Akash Badshah, Sidhant Gupta, Daniel Morris, Shwetak Patel and Desney Tan. 2012. GyroTab: a handheld device that provides reactive torque feedback. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12), 31533156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Karlin Bark, Jason W. Wheeler, Sunthar Premakumar and Mark R. Cutkosky. 2008. Comparison of Skin Stretch and Vibrotactile Stimulation for Feedback of Proprioceptive Information. In Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS'08), 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Olivier Bau, Ivan Poupyrev, Ali Israr and Chris Harrison. 2010. TeslaTouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST'10), 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mohamed Benali-khoudja, Moustapha Hafez, Jean-marc Alex and Abderrahmane Kheddar. 2003. Tactile interfaces: a state-of-the-art survey. Int Symposium on Robotics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeffrey P. Bigham, Chandrika Jayant, Hanjie Ji, Greg Little, Andrew Miller, Robert C. Miller, Robin Miller, Aubrey Tatarowicz, Brandyn White and Samual White. 2010. VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST'10), 333--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Francesco Chinello, Claudio Pacchierotti, Nikos G. Tsagarakis and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2016. Design of a wearable skin stretch cutaneous device for the upper limb. In IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS'16), 1420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Artem Dementyev, Hsin-Liu Kao, Inrak Choi, Deborah Ajilo, Maggie Xu, Joseph A. Paradiso, Chris Schmandt and Sean Follmer. 2016. Rovables: Miniature On-Body Robots as Mobile Wearables. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'16), 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Panteleimon Dimitriadis and Jason Alexander. 2014. Evaluating the effectiveness of physical shape-change for in-pocket mobile device notifications. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI'14), 25892592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alex Dobie. 2005. First look: Lenovo's crazy Magic View smartwatch concept. Retrieved August 10, 2017 from https://www.androidcentral.com/first-looklenovos-crazy-magic-view-smartwatch-conceptGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jun Gong, Lan Li, Daniel Vogel and Xing-Dong Yang. 2017. Cito: An Actuated Smartwatch for Extended Interactions. In Proceedings of the 35th annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'17), 5331--5345. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ashley L. Guinan, Nathaniel A. Caswell, Frank A. Drews and William R. Provancher. 2013. A video game controller with skin stretch haptic feedback. In IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE'13), 456--457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ashley L. Guinan, Markus N. Montandon, Andrew J. Doxon and William R. Provancher. 2014. {D03} kinesthetic physical interaction with a multi-handed tactile display. In IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS'14), 1--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang He, Cheng Xu, Ding Xu and Ryan Brill. 2015. PneuHaptic: delivering haptic cues with a pneumatic armband. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'15), 47--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Fabian Hemmert. 2008. Ambient Life: Permanent Tactile Life-like Actuation as a Status Display in Mobile Phones. In Adjunct Proc. of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'08).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Fabian Hemmert, Susann Hamann, Matthias Löwe, Anne Wohlauf and Gesche Joost. 2010. Shape-changing mobiles: tapering in one-dimensional deformational displays in mobile phones. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction (TEI'10), 249--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Fabian Hemmert, Matthias Löwe, Anne Wohlauf and Gesche Joost. 2013. Animate mobiles: proxemically reactive posture actuation as a means of relational interaction with mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI'13), 267--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Da-Yuan Huang, Ruizhen Guo, Jun Gong, Jingxian Wang, John Graham, De-Nian Yang and Xing-Dong Yang. 2017. RetroShape: Leveraging Rear-Surface Shape Displays for 2.5D Interaction on Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'17), 539--551. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Francis Iannacci, Erik Turnquist, Daniel Avrahami, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2011. The haptic laser: multisensation tactile feedback for at-a-distance physical space perception and interaction. In Proceedings of 29th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 2047--2050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Alexandra Ion, Edward Jay Wang and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Skin Drag Displays: Dragging a Physical Tactor across the User's Skin Produces a Stronger Tactile Stimulus than Vibrotactile. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15), 2501--2504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Alexander Kron and Gunther Schmidt. 2003. Multifingered tactile feedback from virtual and remote environments. In 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS'03), 16--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shinobu Kuroki, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Hideaki Nii, Naoki Kawakami and Susumu Tachi. 2007. Proposal for tactile sense presentation that combines electrical and mechanical stimulus. In Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07), 121--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jaeyeon Lee, Jaehyun Han and Geehyuk Lee. 2015. Investigating the Information Transfer Efficiency of a 3x3 Watch-back Tactile Display. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15), 1229--1232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Seungyon "Claire" Lee and Thad Starner. 2010. BuzzWear: alert perception in wearable tactile displays on the wrist. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10), 433--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Seungyon Claire Lee and Thad Starner. 2009. Mobile gesture interaction using wearable tactile displays. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'09), 3437--3442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Joanne Leong, Patrick Parzer, Florian Perteneder, Teo Babic, Christian Rendl, Anita Vogl, Hubert Egger, Alex Olwal and Michael Haller. 2016. proCover: Sensory Augmentation of Prosthetic Limbs Using Smart Textile Covers. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'16), 335--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Yi-Chi Liao, Yi-Ling Chen, Jo-Yu Lo, Rong-Hao Liang, Liwei Chan and Bing-Yu Chen. 2016. EdgeVib: Effective Alphanumeric Character Output Using a Wrist-Worn Tactile Display. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'16), 595--601. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Yi-Chi Liao, Yi-Ling Chen, Jo-Yu Lo, Rong-Hao Liang, Liwei Chan and Bing-Yu Chen. 2016. EdgeVib: Effective Alphanumeric Character Output Using a Wrist-Worn Tactile Display. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'16), 595--601. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Yi-Chi Liao, Shun-Yao Yang, Rong-Hao Liang, Liwei Chan and Bing-Yu Chen. 2015. ThirdHand: wearing a robotic arm to experience rich force feedback. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Emerging Technologies (SA'15), 1--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jeff Lieberman and Cynthia Breazeal. 2007. TIKL: Development of a Wearable Vibrotactile Feedback Suit for Improved Human Motor Learning. In IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 919--926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Pedro Lopes and Patrick Baudisch. 2013. Musclepropelled force feedback: bringing force feedback to mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13), 2577--2580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Pedro Lopes, Alexandra Ion and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Impacto: Simulating Physical Impact by Combining Tactile Stimulation with Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'15), 11--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kent Lyons, David Nguyen, Daniel Ashbrook and Sean White. 2012. Facet: a multi-segment wrist worn system In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST'12), 123130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Michael Matscheko, Alois Ferscha, Andreas Riener and Manuel Lehner. 2010. Tactor placement in wrist worn wearables. In International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'10), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Troy McDaniel, Morris Goldberg, Daniel Villanueva, Lakshmie Narayan Viswanathan and Sethuraman Panchanathan. 2011. Motor learning using a kinematicvibrotactile mapping targeting fundamental movements. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia (MM'11), 543--552. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Troy McDaniel, Sreekar Krishna, Vineeth Balasubramanian, Dirk Colbry and Sethuraman Panchanathan. 2008. Using a haptic belt to convey nonverbal communication cues during social interactions to individuals who are blind. In Haptic Audio visual Environments and Games (HAVE'08), 13--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Ken Nakagaki, Sean Follmer and Hiroshi Ishii. 2015. LineFORM: Actuated Curve Interfaces for Display, Interaction, and Constraint. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'15), 333--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Akio Nakamura, Sou Tabata, Tomoya Ueda, Shinichiro Kiyofuji and Yoshinori Kuno. 2005. Multimodal presentation method for a dance training system. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'05), 1685--1688. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Simon Olberding, Kian Peen Yeo, Suranga Nanayakkara and Jurgen Steimle. 2013. AugmentedForearm: exploring the design space of a display-enhanced forearm. In Proceedings of the 4th Augmented Human International Conference (AH'13), 9--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Stefano Papetti, Federico Fontana, Marco Civolani, Amir Berrezag and Vincent Hayward. 2010. Audiotactile display of ground properties using interactive shoes. In Haptic and Audio Interaction Design (HAID'10). 117--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jerome Pasquero, Scott J. Stobbe and Noel Stonehouse. 2011. A haptic wristwatch for eyes-free interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11), 3257--3266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Fabrizio Pece, Juan Zarate, Velko Vechev, Nadine Besse, Olexandr Gudozhnik, Herbert Shea and Otmar Hilliges. 2017. MagTics: Flexible and Thin Form Factor Magnetic Actuators for Dynamic and Wearable Haptic Feedback. In Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST'17). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Esben W Pedersen, Sriram Subramanian and Kasper Hornbæk. 2014. Is my phone alive?: a large-scale study of shape change in handheld devices using videos. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI'14), 25792588. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Ioannis Politis, Stephen A Brewster and Frank Pollick. 2014. Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI'14), 4067--4076. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster and Frank Pollick. 2015. To Beep or Not to Beep?: Comparing Abstract versus Language-Based Multimodal Driver Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15), 39713980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Helena Pongrac. 2008. Vibrotactile perception: examining the coding of vibrations and the just noticeable difference under various conditions. In Multimedia Systems, 297--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Wang Qi and Vincent Hayward. 2009. Biomechanically Optimized Distributed Tactile Transducer Based on Lateral Skin Deformation. In International Journal of Robotics Research, 323--335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Zhan F. Quek, Samuel B. Schorr, Ilana Nisky, William R. Provancher and Allison M. Okamura. 2014. Sensory substitution using 3-degree-of-freedom tangential and normal skin deformation feedback. In IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS'14), 27--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Jun Rekimoto. 2013. Traxion: a tactile interaction device with virtual force sensation. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '13), 427--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Joseph M. Romano and Katherine J. Kuchenbecker. 2009. The AirWand: Design and characterization of a large-workspace haptic device. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'09), 1461--1466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Anne Roudaut, Abhijit Karnik, Markus Löchtefeld and Sriram Subramanian. 2013. Morphees: toward high shape resolution in self-actuated flexible mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13), 593602. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Thijs Roumen, Simon T Perrault and Shengdong Zhao. 2015. Notiring: A comparative study of notification channels for wearable interactive rings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15), 2497--2500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Christian Schonauer, Kenichiro Fukushi, Alex Olwal, Hannes Kaufmann and Ramesh Raskar. 2012. Multimodal motion guidance: techniques for adaptive and dynamic feedback. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction (ICMI'12), 133--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Teddy Seyed, Xing-Dong Yang and Daniel Vogel. 2016. Doppio: A Reconfigurable Dual-Face Smartwatch for Tangible Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'16), 4675--4686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Alejandro Jarillo Silva, Omar A Domínguez Ramirez, Vicente Parra Vega and Jesus P Ordaz Oliver. 2009. Phantom omni haptic device: Kinematic and manipulability. In Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA'09), 193--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Daniel Spelmezan, Mareike Jacobs, Anke Hilgers and Jan Borchers. 2009. Tactile motion instructions for physical activities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09), 2243--2252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. H. Christiaan Stronks, Daniel J. Parker, Janine Walker, Paulette Lieby and Nick Barnes. 2015. The feasibility of coin motors for use in a vibrotactile display for the blind. Artificial organs, 480--491.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Koji Tsukada and Michiaki Yasumura. 2004. Activebelt: Belt-type wearable tactile display for directional navigation. In Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'04), 384--399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. SAMSUNG GEAR VR. 2017. Retrieved August 15, 2017 from www.samsung.com/us/explore/gear-vr/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Ernst Weber. 1978. De pulsu, resorptione, audita et tactu-annotationes anatomicae et physiologicae (HE Ross, Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Cary Williams, Xing Dong Yang, Grant Partridge, Joshua Millarusiskin, Arkady Major and Pourang Irani. 2011. TZee: exploiting the lighting properties of multitouch tabletops for tangible 3d interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 1363--1372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. John Williamson, Roderick Murray-Smith and Stephen Hughes. 2007. Shoogle: excitatory multimodal interaction on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07), 121--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Lining Yao, Ryuma Niiyama, Jifei Ou, Sean Follmer, Clark Della Silva and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. PneUI: Pneumatically actuated soft composite materials for shape changing interfaces. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST'13), 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Vibol Yem, Ryuta Okazaki, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2016. FinGAR: combination of electrical and mechanical stimulation for high-fidelity tactile presentation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Emerging Technologies (SIGGRAPH '16). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Jetto: Using Lateral Force Feedback for Smartwatch Interactions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader