Philipp Mock
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a novel approach for automatic prediction of risk of ADHD in schoolchildren based on touch interaction data. We performed a study with 129 fourth-grade students solving math problems on a multiple-choice interface to obtain a large dataset of touch trajectories. Using Support Vector Machines, we analyzed the predictive power of such data for ADHD scales. For regression of overall ADHD scores, we achieve a mean squared error of 0.0962 on a four-point scale (R² = 0.5667). Classification accuracy for increased ADHD risk (upper vs. lower third of collected scores) is 91.1%.
- Mark H. Ashcraft and John Battaglia. 1978. Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, Vol. 4, 5 (1978), 527.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Richard N. Blazey, David L. Patton, and Peter A. Parks. 2003. ADHD detection by eye saccades. US Patent 6,652,458.Google Scholar
- Marie-Christine Brault and Éric Lacourse. 2012. Prevalence of Prescribed Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Medications and Diagnosis among Canadian Preschoolers and School-Age Children: 1994textendash2007. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 57, 2 (feb 2012), 93--101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Xavier Castellanos, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke, Michael P. Milham, and Rosemary Tannock. 2006. Characterizing cognition in ADHD: Beyond executive dysfunction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 10, 3 (2006), 117--124.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Xavier Castellanos, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke, Anouk Scheres, Adriana Di Martino, Christopher Hyde, and Judith R. Walters. 2005. Varieties of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-related intra-individual variability. Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 57, 11 (2005), 1416--1423.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Manfred Dö pfner, Anja Gö rtz-Dorten, and Gerd Lehmkuhl. 2009. Diagnostik-System für psychische Stö rungen nach ICD-10 und DSM-IV für Kinder und Jugendliche-II: DISYPS-II; Manual. Huber, Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- George J. DuPaul, Thomas J. Power, Arthur D. Anastopoulos, and Robert Reid. 1998. ADHD Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, norms, and clinical interpretation. Guilford Press, New York, NY, US.Google Scholar
- Moshe Fried, Eteri Tsitsiashvili, Yoram S. Bonneh, Anna Sterkin, Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe, Tamir Epstein, and Uri Polat. 2014. ADHD subjects fail to suppress eye blinks and microsaccades while anticipating visual stimuli but recover with medication. Vision research, Vol. 101 (2014), 62--72.Google Scholar
- Yuan Gao, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Hongying Meng. 2012. What does touch tell us about emotions in touchscreen-based gameplay? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 19, 4 (2012), 31. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Isabelle Guyon and André Elisseeff. 2003. An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), Vol. 3, 3 (2003), 1157--1182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trevor J. Hastie and Robert Tibshirani. 1990. Generalized Additive Models. Vol. 43. CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Sepp Hochreiter and Jü rgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, Vol. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blair A. Johnston, Benson Mwangi, Keith Matthews, David Coghill, Kerstin Konrad, and J. Douglas Steele. 2014. Brainstem abnormalities in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder support high accuracy individual diagnostic classification. Human brain mapping, Vol. 35, 10 (2014), 5179--5189.Google Scholar
- Ronald C. Kessler, Lenard Adler, Minnie Ames, Olga Demler, Steve Faraone, E. V. A. Hiripi, Mary J. Howes, Robert Jin, Kristina Secnik, and Thomas Spencer. 2005. The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychological medicine, Vol. 35, 2 (2005), 245--256.Google Scholar
- Elise Klein, Korbinian Moeller, Katharina Dressel, Frank Domahs, Guilherme Wood, Klaus Willmes, and Hans-Christoph Nuerk. 2010. To carry or not to carry -- Is this the question? Disentangling the carry effect in multi-digit addition. Acta psychologica, Vol. 135, 1 (2010), 67--76.Google Scholar
- Ron Kohavi and George H. John. 1997. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 97 (1997), 273--324. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klaus D. Kubinger. 2009. Psychologische Diagnostik: Theorie und Praxis psychologischen Diagnostizierens. Hogrefe Verlag.Google Scholar
- S. Lis, N. Baer, C. Stein-En-Nosse, B. Gallhofer, G. Sammer, and P. Kirsch. 2010. Objective measurement of motor activity during cognitive performance in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 122, 4 (feb 2010), 285--294.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sandra K. Loo and Scott Makeig. 2012. Clinical Utility of EEG in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Research Update. Neurotherapeutics, Vol. 9, 3 (2012), 569--587.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Philipp Mock, Peter Gerjets, Maike Tibus, Ulrich Trautwein, Korbinian Mö ller, and Wolfgang Rosenstiel. 2016. Using Touchscreen Interaction Data to Predict Cognitive Workload. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '16). ACM, 349--356. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yukifumi Monden, Ippeita Dan, Masako Nagashima, Haruka Dan, Minako Uga, Takahiro Ikeda, Daisuke Tsuzuki, Yasushi Kyutoku, Yuji Gunji, and Daisuke Hirano. 2015. Individual classification of ADHD children by right prefrontal hemodynamic responses during a go/no-go task as assessed by fNIRS. NeuroImage: Clinical, Vol. 9 (2015), 1--12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niamh O'Mahony, Blanca Florentino-Liano, Juan J. Carballo, Enrique Baca-Garcí a, and Antonio Arté s Rodrí guez. 2014. Objective diagnosis of ADHD using IMUs. Medical Engineering & Physics, Vol. 36, 7 (jul 2014), 922--926.Google Scholar
- Tuulia M. Ortner, Ralf Horn, Martin Kersting, Stefan Krumm, Klaus D. Kubinger, René T. Proyer, Lothar Schmidt-Atzert, Gernot Schuhfried, Astrid Schütz, Michaela M. Wagner-Menghin, et almbox. 2007. Standortbestimmung und Zukunft Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests. Report Psychologie, Vol. 32, 2 (2007), 60--69.Google Scholar
- Sengwee Toh. 2006. Datapoints: Trends in ADHD and stimulant use among children, 1993--2003. Psychiatric Services, Vol. 57, 8 (2006), 1091.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Lisa Anthony, and Quincy Brown. 2015. Child or adult? Inferring Smartphone users' age group from touch measurements alone. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2015. Springer, 1--9.Google Scholar
- Erik G. Willcutt, Alysa E. Doyle, Joel T. Nigg, Stephen V. Faraone, and Bruce F. Pennington. 2005. Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review . Biological Psychiatry , Vol. 57, 11 (2005), 1336--1346.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zoe Young, Michael P. Craven, Maddie Groom, and John Crowe. 2014. Snappy App: a mobile continuous performance test with physical activity measurement for assessing Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 363--373.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Predicting ADHD Risk from Touch Interaction Data
Recommendations
Sexting experiences and motivations among adolescents with ADHD and ASD
AbstractSexting (i.e., to send and receive self-produced sexual materials) has become a common element in adolescents’ socio-sexual exploration. Although often harmless, sexting also involves the risk of abuse, and potentially more so for some ...
Highlights- Adolescents, including those with ADHD/ASD, mainly use sexting for sexual gratification and exploration.
Comparing Tangible and Multi-touch Interaction for Interactive Data Visualization Tasks
TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionInteractive visualization plays a key role in the analysis of large datasets. It can help users to explore data, investigate hypotheses and find patterns. The easier and more tangible the interaction, the more likely it is to enhance understanding. This ...
Touch interaction for children aged 3 to 6 years
Our present understanding of young children's touch-screen performance is still limited, as only few studies have considered analyzing children's touch interaction patterns so far. In this work, we address children aged between 3 and 6 years old during ...
Comments