skip to main content
10.1145/3243082.3243106acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hybrid Recommender System Based on Multi-Hierarchical Ontologies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommender Systems (RSs) are usually based in User Profiles (UP) to identify items of interest to a user, among the items of a usually vast collection. Traditional RSs are mostly based on ratings of items made by users and do not attempt to estimate the reasons that led the user to access these items. Furthermore, such systems may suffer from the lack of rating data, the so-called data sparsity. This paper proposes a hybrid recommender system that considers, besides the ratings of the users, a feature description analysis of the items accessed by the users. This analysis is based on ontological UP, described in accordance with a set of ontologies, one per feature. The use of ontologies provides a weak coupling between the proposed RS and the domain of the item to be recommended. The effectiveness of our proposal is demonstrated and evaluated in the movie domain using the MovieLens dataset. The experiments demonstrated an improvement in the quality of the recommendations and a greater tolerance to the data sparsity, compared to state-of-art systems.

References

  1. Gediminas Adomavicius and YoungOk Kwon. 2007. New Recommendation Techniques for Multicriteria Rating Systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 3 (May 2007), 48--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Charu C. Aggarwal. 2016. Recommender systems (1 ed.). Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jose Aguilar, Priscila Valdiviezo-Díaz, and Guido Riofrio. 2017. A general framework for intelligent recommender systems. Applied Computing and Informatics 13, 2 (7 2017), 147--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Al Alshaikh, G. Uchyigit, and R. Evans. 2017. A research paper recommender system using a Dynamic Normalized Tree of Concepts model for user modelling. In 2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). IEEE, 200--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. John R Anderson. 1983. A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 22, 3 (6 1983), 261--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Zahra Bahramian, Rahim Ali Abbaspour, and Christophe Claramunt. 2017. A Context-aware Tourism Recommender System Based on a Spreading Activation Method. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-4/W4 (9 2017), 333--339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Robin Burke. 2007. Hybrid Web Recommender Systems. In The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, Peter Brusilovsky, Alfred Kobsa, and Wolfgang Nejdl (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 377--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ivan Cantador, Alejandro Bellogin, and Pablo Castells. 2008. A Multilayer Ontology-based Hybrid Recommendation Model. AI Commun. 21, 2-3 (April 2008), 203--210. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1460172.1460184 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Alexander Chernev, Ulf Böckenholt, and Joseph Goodman. 2015. Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology 25, 2 (2015), 333--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bruno B. Fernandes, Juarez A. P. Sacenti, and Roberto Willrich. 2017. Using Implicit Feedback for Neighbors Selection: Alleviating the Sparsity Problem in Collaborative Recommendation Systems. In Proceedings of the 23rd Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, Webmedia 2017, Gramado, Brazil. 341--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Susan Gauch, Mirco Speretta, Aravind Chandramouli, and Alessandro Micarelli. 2007. User Profiles for Personalized Information Access. In The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 54--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. F. Maxwell Harper and Joseph A. Konstan. 2016. The MovieLens Datasets: History and Context. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 5, 4, Article 19 (Jan. 2016), 19 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hubert Kadima and Maria Malek. 2010. Toward ontology-based personalization of a recommender system in social network. In International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 119--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Praveen Lakkaraju, Susan Gauch, and Mirco Speretta. 2008. Document Similarity Based on Concept Tree Distance. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 127--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fábio A. P. Paiva, José A. F. Costa, and Cláudio R. M. Silva. 2017. A Personality-Based Recommender System for Semantic Searches in Vehicles Sales Portals. In Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 600--612.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Vreda Pieterse and Derrick Kourie. 2014. Lists, Taxonomies, Lattices, Thesauri and Ontologies: Paving a Pathway Through a Terminological Jungle. 41 (Jan. 2014), 217--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Juarez A. P. Sacenti, Fabio Salvini, Renato Fileto, Alessandra Raffaetà, and Alessandro Roncato. 2015. Automatically Tailoring Semantics-Enabled Dimensions for Movement Data Warehouses. In Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 205--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Anderson Salles and Roberto Willrich. 2015. Recommending Web Service Based on Ontologies for Digital Repositories. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 65--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sebastian Schelter and Sean Owen. 2012. Collaborative filtering with apache mahout. ACM Conference on Recommender Systems 2012 (Sept. 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ahu Sieg, Bamshad Mobasher, and Robin Burke. 2010. Improving the Effectiveness of Collaborative Recommendation with Ontology-based User Profiles. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Information Heterogeneity and Fusion in Recommender Systems (HetRec '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Thales Nascimento Silva. 2015. Um modelo baseado em ontologia para suporte a tarefa intensiva em conhecimento de recomendação. Master's thesis. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/159017Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Márcio Soares and Paula Viana. 2017. The Semantics of Movie Metadata: Enhancing User Profiling for Hybrid Recommendation. In Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 328--338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. YingSi Zhao and Bo Shen. 2016. Empirical Study of User Preferences Based on Rating Data of Movies. PLOS ONE 11, 1 (Jan. 2016), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Hybrid Recommender System Based on Multi-Hierarchical Ontologies

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WebMedia '18: Proceedings of the 24th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
          October 2018
          437 pages
          ISBN:9781450358675
          DOI:10.1145/3243082

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          © 2018 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 October 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          WebMedia '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of111submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader