skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300250acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making Sense of Art: Access for Gallery Visitors with Vision Impairments

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

While there is widespread recognition of the need to provide people with vision impairments (PVI) equitable access to cultural institutions such as art galleries, this is not easy. We present the results of a collaboration with a regional art gallery who wished to open their collection to PVIs in the local community. We describe a novel model that provides three different ways of accessing the gallery, depending upon visual acuity and mobility: virtual tours, self-guided tours and guided tours. As far as possible the model supports autonomous exploration by PVIs. It was informed by a value sensitive design exploration of the values and value conflicts of the primary stakeholders.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper020p.mp4

mp4

1.1 MB

References

  1. Giorgos Anagnostakis, Michalis Antoniou, Elena Kardamitsi, Thodoris Sachinidis, Panayiotis Koutsabasis, Modestos Stavrakis, Spyros Vosinakis, and Dimitris Zissis. 2016. Accessible museum collections for the visually impaired: Combining tactile exploration, audio descriptions and mobile gestures. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) Adjunct. ACM, 1021--1025. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Vassilios S. Argyropoulos and Charikleia Kanari. 2015. Re-imagining the museum through touch': Reflections of individuals with visual disability on their experience of museum-visiting in Greece. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research/Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap 9, 2 (2015), 130--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Saki Asakawa, João Guerreiro, Dragan Ahmetovic, Kris M. Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. The present and future of museum accessibility for people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 382--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Elisabeth Salzhauer Axel and Paula L. Gerson. 2000. Art History Through Touch and Sound: A Multisensory Guide for the Blind and Visually Impaired. OpticalTouch Systems Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Elisabeth Salzhauer Axel, Virginia Hooper, Teresa Kardoulias, Sarah Stephenson Keyes, and Francesca Rosenberg). {n. d.}. ABS's Guidelines for Verbal Description. http://www.artbeyondsight.org/ handbook/acs-guidelines.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Elisabeth Salzhauer Axel and Nina Sobol Levent. 2003. Art Beyond Sight: A Resource Guide to Art, Creativity, and Visual Impairment. American Foundation for the Blind.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. David Bearman. 2011. 3D representations in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal 54, 1 (2011), 55--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jens Bornschein, Denise Bornschein, and Gerhard Weber. 2018. Comparing computer-based drawing methods for blind people with realtime tactile feedback. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Braille Authority of North America. 2010. Guidelines and Standards for Tactile Graphics. The Braille Authority of North America. http: //www.brailleauthority.org/tg/web-manual/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lorna M. Brown and Stephen A. Brewster. 2003. Drawing by ear: Interpreting sonified line graphs. In Proceedings International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD). 152--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Emeline Brule, Gilles Bailly, Anke Brock, Frédéric Valentin, Grégoire Denis, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2016. MapSense: Multi-sensory interactive maps for children living with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 445--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fiona Candlin. 2003. Blindness, art and exclusion in museums and galleries. International Journal of Art & Design Education 22, 1 (2003), 100--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fiona Candlin. 2004. Don't touch! Hands off! Art, blindness and the conservation of expertise. Body & Society 10, 1 (2004), 71--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Fiona Candlin. 2006. The dubious inheritance of touch: Art history and museum access. Journal of Visual Culture 5, 2 (2006), 137--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fiona Candlin. 2010. Art, Museums and Touch. Manchester University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Virginio Cantoni, Luca Lombardi, Alessandra Setti, Stanislav Gyoshev, Dimitar Karastoyanov, and Nikolay Stoimenov. 2018. Art masterpieces accessibility for blind and visually impaired people. In International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, 267--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sofia Cavaco, J. Tomas Henriques, Michele Mengucci, Nuno Correia, and Francisco Medeiros. 2013. Color sonification for the visually impaired. Procedia Technology 9 (2013), 1048--1057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Benjamin K. Davison. 2012. Evaluating auditory graphs with blind students in a classroom. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 102 (2012), 4--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Karin De Coster and Gerrit Loots. 2004. Somewhere in between touch and vision: In search of a meaningful art education for blind individuals. International Journal of Art & Design Education 23, 3 (2004), 326--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Fondation de France/International Council of Museums. 1991. Museums Without Barriers: A New Deal for Disabled People. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Harriet Dunn. 2018. Comment from the field: Facilitating art access for people with visual impairment. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 12, 2 (2018), 245--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Alexander Fiannaca, Ilias Apostolopoulous, and Eelke Folmer. 2014. Headlock: A wearable navigation aid that helps blind cane users traverse large open spaces. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. ACM, 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Euan Freeman, Graham Wilson, Stephen Brewster, Gabriel Baud-Bovy, Charlotte Magnusson, and Hector Caltenco. 2017. Audible beacons and wearables in schools: Helping young visually impaired children play and move independently. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4146--4157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Batya Friedman, David G. Hendry, and Alan Borning. 2017. A survey of value sensitive design methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human-- Computer Interaction 11, 2 (2017), 63--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2006. Value sensitive design and information systems. In Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations. Sharpe, 348--372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rocco Furferi, Lapo Governi, Yary Volpe, Luca Puggelli, Niccolò Vanni, and Monica Carfagni. 2014. From 2D to 2.5 D i.e. from painting to tactile model. Graphical Models 76, 6 (2014), 706--723. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kozue Handa, Hitoshi Dairoku, and Yoshiko Toriyama. 2010. Investigation of priority needs in terms of museum service accessibility for visually impaired visitors. British Journal of Visual Impairment 28, 3 (2010), 221--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Gretchen Henrich, Felice Q Cleveland, and Emily Wolverton. 2014. Case studies from three museums in Art Beyond Sight's multi-site museum accessibility study. Museums & Social Issues 9, 2 (2014), 124-- 143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ronald A. Hinton. 1991. Use of tactile pictures to communicate the work of visual artists to blind people. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 85, 4 (1991), 174--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Leona Holloway, Kim Marriott, and Matthew Butler. 2018. Accessible maps for the blind: Comparing 3D printed models with tactile graphics. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Finn Kensing and Kim Halskov Madsen. 1991. Generating visions: Future workshops and metaphorical design. In Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., 155--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jee-Eun Kim, Masahiro Bessho, Shinsuke Kobayashi, Noboru Koshizuka, and Ken Sakamura. 2016. Navigating visually impaired travelers in a large train station using smartphone and bluetooth low energy. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, 604--611. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Georgina Kleege. 2017. More Than Meets the Eye: What Blindness Brings to Art. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nina Levent and Christine Reich. 2013. Museum accessibility: Combining audience research and staff training. Journal of Museum Education 38, 2 (2013), 218--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Morris Hargreaves McIntyre. 2008. Touching History: An Evaluation of Hands On Desks at The British Museum. London: British Museum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Peter B. L. Meijer. 1992. An experimental system for auditory image representations. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 39, 2 (1992), 112--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Moritz Neumüller, Andreas Reichinger, Florian Rist, and Christian Kern. 2014. 3D printing for cultural heritage: Preservation, accessibility, research and education. In 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage. Springer, 119--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). 2006. Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/ convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Charles O'Neill and Kia Ng. 2008. Hearing images: Interactive sonification interface for images. In EVA 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Thierry Pun, Benoit Deville, and Guido Bologna. 2010. Sonification of colour and depth in a mobility aid for blind people. In Proceedings International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD). 9--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Kyle Rector, Keith Salmon, Dan Thornton, Neel Joshi, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2017. Eyes-free art: Exploring proxemic audio interfaces for blind and low vision art engagement. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Christine Reich, Anna Lindgren-Streicher, Marta Beyer, Nina Levent, Joan Pursley, and Leigh Ann Mesiti. 2011. Speaking Out on Art and Museums: A Study on the Needs and Preferences of Adults who are Blind or have Low Vision. Technical Report No. 2011--3. Museum of Science, Boston and Art Beyond Sight.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Andreas Reichinger, Stefan Maierhofer, and Werner Purgathofer. 2011. High-quality tactile paintings. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) 4, 2 (2011), 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jordan Boaz Rodrigues, Alinne Victoria Martins Ferreira, Ivana Marcia Oliveira Maia, Geraldo Braz Junior, João Dallyson Sousa de Almeida, and Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva. 2018. Image processing of artworks for construction of 3D models accessible to the visually impaired. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, 243--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Katerine Romeo, Marion Chottin, Pierre Ancet, and Edwige Pissaloux. 2018. Access to artworks and its mediation by and for visually impaired persons: Introduction to the special thematic session. In International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP). Springer, 233--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Shalom H. Schwartz. 2012. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1 (2012), 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Roberto Scopigno, Paolo Cignoni, Nico Pietroni, Marco Callieri, and Matteo Dellepiane. 2014. Digital fabrication technologies for cultural heritage (STAR). In GCH '14 Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Roberto Scopigno, Paolo Cignoni, Nico Pietroni, Marco Callieri, and Matteo Dellepiane. 2017. Digital fabrication techniques for cultural heritage: A survey. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 36. Wiley Online Library, 6--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Abigale Stangl, Chia-Lo Hsu, and Tom Yeh. 2015. Transcribing across the senses: Community efforts to create 3D printable accessible tactile pictures for young children with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. ACM, 127--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Sarit Szpiro, Yuhang Zhao, and Shiri Azenkot. 2016. Finding a store, searching for a product: A study of daily challenges of low vision people. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 61--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Yary Volpe, Rocco Furferi, Lapo Governi, and Giovanna Tennirelli. 2014. Computer-based methodologies for semi-automatic 3D model generation from paintings. International Journal of Computer Aided Engineering and Technology 6, 1 (2014), 88--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Paul F. Wilson, Janet Stott, Jason M. Warnett, Alex Attridge, M. Paul Smith, and Mark A. Williams. 2017. Evaluation of touchable 3D-printed replicas in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal 60, 4 (2017), 445-- 465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Shaun K. Kane, and Gregg C. Vanderheiden. 2018. Ability-based design. Commun. ACM 61, 6 (2018), 62--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Jizhong Xiao, Samleo L Joseph, Xiaochen Zhang, Bing Li, Xiaohai Li, and Jianwei Zhang. 2015. An assistive navigation framework for the visually impaired. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 45, 5 (2015), 635--640.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Tsubasa Yoshida, Kris M. Kitani, Hideki Koike, Serge Belongie, and Kevin Schlei. 2011. EdgeSonic: Image feature sonification for the visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference (AH '11). ACM, Article 11, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Making Sense of Art: Access for Gallery Visitors with Vision Impairments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format