skip to main content
research-article

A Conceptual Framework and Content Model for Next Generation Presentation Solutions

Published:13 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Mainstream presentation tools such as Microsoft PowerPoint were originally built to mimic physical media like photographic slides and still exhibit the same characteristics. However, the state of the art in presentation tools shows that more recent solutions start to go beyond the classic presentation paradigms. For instance, presentations are becoming increasingly non-linear, content is quickly evolving beyond simple text and images and the way we author our presentations is becoming more collaborative. Nevertheless, existing presentation content models are often based on assumptions that do not apply to the current state of presentations any more, making them incompatible for some use cases and limiting the potential of end-user presentation solutions. In order to support state-of-the-art presentation functionality, we rethink the concept of a presentation and introduce a conceptual framework for presentation content. We then present a new content model for presentation solutions based on the Resource-Selector-Link (RSL) hypermedia metamodel. We further discuss an implementation of our model and show some example use cases. We conclude by outlining how design choices in the model address currently unmet needs with regards to extensibility, content reuse, collaboration, semantics, user access management, non-linearity, and context awareness, resulting in better support for the corresponding end-user functionality in presentation tools.

References

  1. Payam M. Barnaghi and Sameem Abdul Kareem. 2006. A Flexible Architecture for Semantic Annotation and Automated Multimedia Presentation Generation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Semantic-Enhanced Multimedia Presentation Systems (SEMPS 2006), Vol. 228. Athens, Greece, 72--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. John Brand. 2004. Presentation (Mis) management: Content and Collaboration Strategies. Delta, Vol. 3057 (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. José H. Canós, Maria Isabel Marante, and Manuel Llavador. 2010. SliDL: A Slide Digital Library Supporting Content Reuse in Presentations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2010). Glasgow, UK, 453--456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Paul De Bra, Geert-Jan Houben, and Hongjing Wu. 1999. AHAM: A Dexter-based Reference Model for Adaptive Hypermedia. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia: Returning to Our Diverse Roots: Returning to Our Diverse Roots (Hypertext 1999). Darmstadt, Germany, 147--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Steven M. Drucker, Georg Petschnigg, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2006. Comparing and Managing Multiple Versions of Slide Presentations. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2006). Montreux, Switzerland, 47--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Darren Edge, Joan Savage, and Koji Yatani. 2013. HyperSlides: Dynamic Presentation Prototyping. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013). ACM, Paris, France, 671--680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Emmanuel Fernandes, Hend Madhour, Sami Miniaoui, and Maia Wentland Forte. 2005. Phoenix Tool: A Support to Semantic Learning Model. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2005). Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 948--949. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Joöl Fisler and Susanne Bleisch. 2006. eLML, The eLesson Markup Language: Developing Sustainable e-Learning Content Using an Open Source XML Framework. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2006). WEBIST, Setúbal, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lance Good and Benjamin B. Bederson. 2002. Zoomable User Interfaces as a Medium for Slide Show Presentations. Information Visualization, Vol. 1 (2002), 35--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Alan G. Gross and Joseph E. Harmon. 2009. The Structure of PowerPoint Presentations: The Art of Grasping Things Whole. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 52, 2 (2009), 121--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Heiko Haller and Andreas Abecker. 2010. iMapping: A Zooming User Interface Approach for Personal and Semantic Knowledge Management. SIGWEB Newsletter Autumn, Article 4 (2010), bibinfonumpages4:1--4:10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Robin H. Kay and Ann LeSage. 2009. Examining the Benefits and Challenges of Using Audience Response Systems: A Review of the Literature. Computers & Education, Vol. 53, 3 (2009), 819--827. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ali Khalili, Sören Auer, Darya Tarasowa, and Ivan Ermilov. 2012. SlideWiki: Elicitation and Sharing of Corporate Knowledge Using Presentations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2012). Springer, Galway, Ireland, 302--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Clemens N. Klokmose, James R. Eagan, Siemen Baader, Wendy Mackay, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2015. Webstrates: Shareable Dynamic Media. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST 2015). Charlotte, USA, 280--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Andrea Kohlhase. 2007. Semantic PowerPoint: Content and Semantic Technology for Educational Added-Value Services in MS PowerPoint. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2007). AACE, Vancouver, Canada, 3576--3583.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Aksha Kumar and Mukundan Sasikumar. 2007. PCML: A Pedagogy-oriented Content Markup Language. Innovations in E-learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Joel Lanir, Kellogg S. Booth, and Anthony Tang. 2008. MultiPresenter: A Presentation System for (Very) Large Display Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM 2008). Vancouver, Canada, 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Leonhard Lichtschlag, Thorsten Karrer, and Jan Borchers. 2009. Fly: A Tool to Author Planar Presentations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009). Boston, USA, 547--556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Yefeng Liu, Darren Edge, and Koji Yatani. 2013. SidePoint: A Peripheral Knowledge Panel for Presentation Slide Authoring. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013). ACM, Paris, France, 681--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Utiyama Masao and Hasida Kôiti. 1999. Automatic Slide Presentation from Semantically Annotated Documents. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Coreference and Its Applications (CorefApp 1999). College Park, USA, 25--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yelena Mejova, Klaar De Schepper, Lawrence Bergman, and Jie Lu. 2011. Reuse in the Wild: An Empirical and Ethnographic Study of Organizational Content Reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011). Vancouver, Canada, 2877--2886.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Tomer Moscovich, Karin Scholz, John F. Hughes, and D. Salesin. 2004. Customizable Presentations. Technical Report. Technical Report CS-04--16, CS Department, Brown University. http://cs.brown.edu/research/pubs/techreports/reports/CS-04--16.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Les Nelson, Satoshi Ichimura, Elin Rønby Pedersen, and Lia Adams. 1999. Palette: A Paper Interface for Giving Presentations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1999). Pittsburgh, USA, 354--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Theodor Holm Nelson. 1995. The Heart of Connection: Hypermedia Unified by Transclusion. Commun. ACM, Vol. 38, 8 (1995), 31--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Dave Raggett. 2006. Slidy: A Web Based Alternative to Microsoft PowerPoint. In Proceedings of XTech (XTech 2006). Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Elke I. Reuss, Beat Signer, and Moira C. Norrie. 2008. PowerPoint Multimedia Presentations in Computer Science Education: What Do Users Need?. In Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Usability & HCI for Education and Work (USAB 2008). Graz, Austria. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Reinout Roels, Yves Baeten, and Beat Signer. 2016. An Interactive Data Visualisation Approach for Next Generation Presentation Tools. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2016). Rome, Italy, 123--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Reinout Roels, Yves Baeten, and Beat Signer. 2017. Interactive and Narrative Data Visualisation for Presentation-Based Knowledge Transfer. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 739 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Reinout Roels, Paul Mecstereagua, and Beat Signer. 2015. An Interactive Source Code Visualisation Plug-in for the MindXpres Presentation Platform. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 583 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Reinout Roels, Paul Mecstereagua, and Beat Signer. 2015. Towards Enhanced Presentation-based Teaching of Programming: An Interactive Source Code Visualisation Approach. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2015). Lisbon, Portugal, 98--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Reinout Roels and Beat Signer. 2014. MindXpres: An Extensible Content-driven Cross-media Presentation Platform. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Web Information System Engineering (WISE 2014). Thessaloniki, Greece.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Reinout Roels, Christophe Vermeylen, and Beat Signer. 2014. A Unified Communication Platform for Enriching and Enhancing Presentations with Active Learning Components. In Proceedings of the IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2014). Athens, Greece, 131--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Andreas Schmidt. 2005. Bridging the Gap Between Knowledge Management and E-Learning with Context-Aware Corporate Learning. In Proceedings of the Biennial Conference on Professional Knowledge Management/Wissensmanagement (WM 2005). Kaiserslautern, Germany, 203--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Beat Signer and Moira C. Norrie. 2007. As We May Link: A General Metamodel for Hypermedia Systems. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2007). Auckland, New Zealand, 359--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Beat Signer and Moira C. Norrie. 2007. PaperPoint: A Paper-based Presentation and Interactive Paper Prototyping Tool. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI 2007). Bonn, Germany, 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ryan Spicer, Yu-Ru Lin, Aisling Kelliher, and Hari Sundaram. 2012. NextSlidePlease: Authoring and Delivering Agile Multimedia Presentations. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), Vol. 8, 4, Article 53 (2012), bibinfonumpages53:1--53:20 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Miles Thorogood. 2016. slideDeck.js: A Platform for Generating Accessible and Interactive Web-Based Course Content. In Proceedings of the 21st Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (WCCCE 2016). Kamloops, Canada, 13:1--13:5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Edward R. Tufte. 2006. The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching Out Corrupts Within, Second Edition. Graphics Press, Cheshire, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Katrien Verbert and Erik Duval. 2008. ALOCOM: A Generic Content Model for Learning Objects. International Journal on Digital Libraries, Vol. 9, 1 (2008), 41--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Katrien Verbert, Xavier Ochoa, and Erik Duval. 2008. The ALOCOM Framework: Towards Scalable Content Reuse. International Journal of Digital Information, Vol. 9, 1 (2008), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Working Group for Learning Object Metadata. 2002. IEEE 1484.12.1--2002 - IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata. https://standards.ieee.org/standard/1484_12_1--2002.html. Accessed: 2019-01-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Noraniah Mohd Yassin. 2005. Learning Object Content Models: A Comparative Analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st Postgraduate Annual Research Seminar (PARS 2005). FSKSM, U™, Malaysia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Douglas E. Zongker and David H. Salesin. 2003. On Creating Animated Presentations. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA 2003). San Diego, USA, 298--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Conceptual Framework and Content Model for Next Generation Presentation Solutions

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
            Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 3, Issue EICS
            June 2019
            553 pages
            EISSN:2573-0142
            DOI:10.1145/3340630
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 June 2019
            Published in pacmhci Volume 3, Issue EICS

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader