Emma McDonnell
ABSTRACT
Oftentimes human computer interactions (HCI) accessibility research designs technology to support Deaf and disabled people in their existing social contexts. I, instead, propose an approach to accessible technology design that follows the disability justice principle of collective access, envisioning hearing and nondisabled people as key participants in making interactions accessible. Using captioning as a case study, I explore ways that technology could support accessible social norms, achieved by first paying close attention to the social, environmental, and technical factors that shape access for d/Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) captioning users. My dissertation work will consist of four studies; 1) an exploration of the factors that shape DHH people's current experiences with and future preferences for captioning tools, 2) codesigning features to support accessible group communication with mixed groups of DHH and hearing people, 3) understanding TikTok captioning practices and their impact on DHH users, and 4) exploring the factors that influence professional captioners’ work.
- Akhter Al Amin, Saad Hassan, Sooyeon Lee, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2022. Watch It, Don't Imagine It: Creating a Better Caption-Occlusion Metric by Collecting More Ecologically Valid Judgments from DHH Viewers. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517681Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Keith Bain, Sara H. Basson, and Mike Wald. 2002. Speech recognition in university classrooms: liberated learning project. In Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies (Assets ’02), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/638249.638284Google ScholarDigital Library
- H.-Dirksen L. Bauman. 2004. Audism: Exploring the Metaphysics of Oppression. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 9, 2: 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enh025Google ScholarCross Ref
- H.-Dirksen L. Bauman and Joseph J. Murray. 2014. Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity. U of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Cynthia L. Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS ’18, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cynthia L. Bennett, Daniela K. Rosner, and Alex S. Taylor. 2020. The Care Work of Access. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376568Google ScholarDigital Library
- Larwan Berke. 2017. Displaying confidence from imperfect automatic speech recognition for captioning. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 117: 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3051519.3051522Google ScholarDigital Library
- Larwan Berke, Khaled Albusays, Matthew Seita, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2019. Preferred Appearance of Captions Generated by Automatic Speech Recognition for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Viewers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312921Google ScholarDigital Library
- Larwan Berke, Christopher Caulfield, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2017. Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Perspectives on Imperfect Automatic Speech Recognition for Captioning One-on-One Meetings. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132541Google ScholarDigital Library
- Larwan Berke, Sushant Kafle, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2018. Methods for Evaluation of Imperfect Captioning Tools by Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Users at Different Reading Literacy Levels. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173665Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janine Butler, Brian Trager, and Byron Behm. 2019. Exploration of Automatic Speech Recognition for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Higher Education Classes. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’19), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353772Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna C. Cavender, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. ClassInFocus: enabling improved visual attention strategies for deaf and hard of hearing students. In Proceeding of the eleventh international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility - ASSETS ’09, 67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1639642.1639656Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lisa B. Elliot, Michael Stinson, Syed Ahmed, and Donna Easton. 2017. User Experiences When Testing a Messaging App for Communication Between Individuals who are Hearing and Deaf or Hard of Hearing. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 405–406. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134798Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lisa Elliot, Michael Stinson, Donna Easton, and Jennifer Bourgeois. 2008. College students’ learning with C-Print's educational software and automatic speech recognition. In American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
- Lance Forshay, Kristi Winter, and Emily M Bender. 2016. Sign Aloud Open Letter. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/ebender/papers/SignAloudOpenLetter.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Benjamin Gorman, Michael Crabb, and Michael Armstrong. 2021. Adaptive Subtitles: Preferences and Trade-Offs in Real-Time Media Adaption. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445509Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Gower, Brent Shiver, Charu Pandhi, and Shari Trewin. 2018. Leveraging Pauses to Improve Video Captions. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’18), 414–416. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3241023Google ScholarDigital Library
- Megan Hofmann, Devva Kasnitz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Cynthia L Bennett. 2020. Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’20), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416996Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna Iovine. 2021. Why is TikTok removing sex ed videos? Mashable. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from https://mashable.com/article/tiktok-sex-education-content-removalGoogle Scholar
- Dhruv Jain, Audrey Desjardins, Leah Findlater, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2019. Autoethnography of a Hard of Hearing Traveler. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’19), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353800Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dhruv Jain, Leah Findlater, Jamie Gilkeson, Benjamin Holland, Ramani Duraiswami, Dmitry Zotkin, Christian Vogler, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2015. Head-Mounted Display Visualizations to Support Sound Awareness for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702393Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dhruv Jain, Rachel Franz, Leah Findlater, Jackson Cannon, Raja Kushalnagar, and Jon Froehlich. 2018. Towards Accessible Conversations in a Mobile Context for People who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236362Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dhruv Jain, Venkatesh Potluri, and Ather Sharif. 2020. Navigating Graduate School with a Disability. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’20), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416986Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sushant Kafle and Matt Huenerfauth. 2017. Evaluating the Usability of Automatically Generated Captions for People who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132542Google ScholarDigital Library
- Devva Kasnitz. 2020. The Politics of Disability Performativity: An Autoethnography. Current Anthropology 61, S21: S16–S25. https://doi.org/10.1086/705782Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saba Kawas, George Karalis, Tzu Wen, and Richard E. Ladner. 2016. Improving Real-Time Captioning Experiences for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982164Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard Kheir and Thomas Way. 2007. Inclusion of deaf students in computer science classes using real-time speech transcription. 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1145/1269900.1268860Google ScholarDigital Library
- R S Kushalnagar, W S Lasecki, and J P Bigham. 2014. Accessibility Evaluation of Classroom Captions Accessibility Evaluation of Classroom Captions Accessibility evaluation of classroom captions. ACM Trans. Access. Comput 5, 7: 23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2543578Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raja Kushalnagar and Poorna Kushalnagar. 2014. Collaborative Gaze Cues and Replay for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08599-9_63Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raja S. Kushalnagar, Gary W. Behm, Aaron W. Kelstone, and Shareef Ali. 2015. Tracked Speech-To-Text Display: Enhancing Accessibility and Readability of Real-Time Speech-To-Text. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS ’15), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809843Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raja S. Kushalnagar, Anna C. Cavender, and Jehan-François Pâris. 2010. Multiple view perspectives: improving inclusiveness and video compression in mainstream classroom recordings. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility - ASSETS ’10, 123. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878827Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raja S. Kushalnagar and Christian Vogler. 2020. Teleconference Accessibility and Guidelines for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Users. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’20), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3417299Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paddy Ladd. 2005. Deafhood: A concept stressing possibilities, not deficits. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 33, 66_suppl: 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14034950510033318Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harlan Lane. 2005. Ethnicity, Ethics, and the Deaf-World. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10, 3: 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni030Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kelly Mack, Maitraye Das, Dhruv Jain, Danielle Bragg, John Tang, Andrew Begel, Erin Beneteau, Josh Urban Davis, Abraham Glasser, Joon Sung Park, and Venkatesh Potluri. 2021. Mixed Abilities and Varied Experiences: a group autoethnography of a virtual summer internship. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’21), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471199Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Dhruv Jain, Lucy Lu Wang, Jon E. Froehlich, and Leah Findlater. 2021. What Do We Mean by “Accessibility Research”?: A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411764.3445412Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Venkatesh Potluri, Maggie Xu, Jailyn Zabala, Jeffrey Bigham, Jennifer Mankoff, and Cynthia Bennett. 2022. Anticipate and Adjust: Cultivating Access in Human-Centered Methods. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501882Google ScholarDigital Library
- James R. Mallory, Michael Stinson, Lisa Elliot, and Donna Easton. 2017. Personal Perspectives on Using Automatic Speech Recognition to Facilitate Communication between Deaf Students and Hearing Customers. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 419–421. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134779Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R. Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS ’10), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878807Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emma J. McDonnell, Ping Liu, Steven M. Goodman, Raja Kushalnagar, Jon E. Froehlich, and Leah Findlater. 2021. Social, Environmental, and Technical: Factors at Play in the Current Use and Future Design of Small-Group Captioning. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2: 434:1-434:25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479578Google ScholarDigital Library
- Caitlin McMullin. 2021. Transcription and Qualitative Methods: Implications for Third Sector Research. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00400-3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dorian Miller, Karl Gyllstrom, David Stotts, and James Culp. 2007. Semi-transparent video interfaces to assist deaf persons in meetings. In Proceedings of the 45th annual southeast regional conference (ACM-SE 45), 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1145/1233341.1233431Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mia Mingus. 2011. Changing the Framework: Disability Justice. Leaving Evidence. Retrieved March 20, 2020 from https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/changing-the-framework-disability-justice/Google Scholar
- Mia Mingus. 2017. Access Intimacy, Interdependence and Disability Justice. Leaving Evidence. Retrieved February 5, 2020 from https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/access-intimacy-interdependence-and-disability-justice/Google Scholar
- Michael Oliver. 1986. Disability and Dependency. A Creation of Industrial Societies? In Disability and Dependency, 7–22.Google Scholar
- Alex Olwal, Kevin Balke, Dmitrii Votintcev, Thad Starner, Paula Conn, Bonnie Chinh, and Benoit Corda. 2020. Wearable Subtitles: Augmenting Spoken Communication with Lightweight Eyewear for All-day Captioning. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1108–1120. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from http://doi.org/10.1145/3379337.3415817Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yi-Hao Peng, Ming-Wei Hsi, Paul Taele, Ting-Yu Lin, Po-En Lai, Leon Hsu, Tzu-chuan Chen, Te-Yen Wu, Yu-An Chen, Hsien-Hui Tang, and Mike Y. Chen. 2018. SpeechBubbles: Enhancing Captioning Experiences for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing People in Group Conversations. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173867Google ScholarDigital Library
- Agnès Piquard-Kipffer, Odile Mella, Jérémy Miranda, Denis Jouvet, and Luiza Orosanu. 2015. Qualitative investigation of the display of speech recognition results for communication with deaf people. In Proceedings of SLPAT 2015: 6th Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W15-5107Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kevin Rathbun, Larwan Berke, Christopher Caulfield, Michael Stinson, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2017. Eye Movements of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Viewers of Automatic Captions. California State University, Northridge. Retrieved August 3, 2020 from http://dspace.calstate.edu/handle/10211.3/190208Google Scholar
- Kathryn E. Ringland, Jennifer Nicholas, Rachel Kornfield, Emily G. Lattie, David C. Mohr, and Madhu Reddy. 2019. Understanding Mental Ill-health as Psychosocial Disability: Implications for Assistive Technology. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’19), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353785Google ScholarDigital Library
- Octavian Robinson. 2010. We Are of a Different Class: Ableist Rhetoric in Deaf America, 1880-1920.Google Scholar
- Octavian E. Robinson and Jonathan Henner. 2017. The personal is political in The Deaf Mute Howls: deaf epistemology seeks disability justice. Disability & Society 32, 9: 1416–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1313723Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew Seita, Khaled Albusays, Sushant Kafle, Michael Stinson, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2018. Behavioral Changes in Speakers who are Automatically Captioned in Meetings with Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Peers. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’18), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236355Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew Seita, Sarah Andrew, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2021. Deaf and hard-of-hearing users’ preferences for hearing speakers’ behavior during technology-mediated in-person and remote conversations. In Proceedings of the 18th International Web for All Conference, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430263.3452430Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew Seita and Matt Huenerfauth. 2020. Deaf Individuals’ Views on Speaking Behaviors of Hearing Peers when Using an Automatic Captioning App. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’20), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383083Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew Seita, Sooyeon Lee, Sarah Andrew, Kristen Shinohara, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2022. Remotely Co-Designing Features for Communication Applications using Automatic Captioning with Deaf and Hearing Pairs. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501843Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sins Invalid. 2019. Skin Tooth and Bone: The Basis of Movement is Our People, a Disability Justice Primer. Sins Invalid.Google Scholar
- John Tang. 2021. Understanding the Telework Experience of People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1: 30:1-30:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449104Google ScholarDigital Library
- Máté Ákos Tündik, György Szaszák, G. Gosztolya, and A. Beke. 2018. User-centric Evaluation of Automatic Punctuation in ASR Closed Captioning. In INTERSPEECH. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2018-1352Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Wald. 2005. Using Automatic Speech Recognition to Enhance Education for All Students: Turning a Vision into Reality. In Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, S3G-22-S3G-25. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1612286Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emily Q. Wang and Anne Marie Piper. 2018. Accessibility in Action: Co-Located Collaboration among Deaf and Hearing Professionals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW: 180:1-180:25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274449Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glen W. White, Jamie Lloyd Simpson, Chiaki Gonda, Craig Ravesloot, and Zach Coble. 2010. Moving from Independence to Interdependence: A Conceptual Model for Better Understanding Community Participation of Centers for Independent Living Consumers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 20, 4: 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207309350561Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rua M. Williams, Kathryn Ringland, Amelia Gibson, Mahender Mandala, Arne Maibaum, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2021. Articulations toward a crip HCI. Interactions 28, 3: 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458453Google ScholarDigital Library
- WIRED. 2022. Are TikTok algorithms changing how people talk about suicide? Ars Technica. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/05/are-tiktok-algorithms-changing-how-people-talk-about-suicide/Google Scholar
- Anon Ymous, Katta Spiel, Os Keyes, Rua M. Williams, Judith Good, Eva Hornecker, and Cynthia L. Bennett. 2020. “I am just terrified of my future” — Epistemic Violence in Disability Related Technology Research. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’20), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381828Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2019. Introducing auto captions. Newsroom | TikTok. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/introducing-auto-captionsGoogle Scholar
- 2022. TikTok Statistics - Everything You Need to Know [Apr 2022 Update]. Wallaroo Media. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from https://wallaroomedia.com/blog/social-media/tiktok-statistics/Google Scholar
- Weaving CHI - Top Keyword Topics. Tableau Software. Retrieved May 13, 2020 from https://public.tableau.com/views/WeavingCHI-TopKeywordTopics/TopKeywordTopics?:embed=y&:display_count=yes&publish=yes:showVizHome=noGoogle Scholar
- What is Disability Justice? Sins Invalid. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from https://www.sinsinvalid.org/news-1/2020/6/16/what-is-disability-justiceGoogle Scholar
- Ava - All-in-One Click Captions for All Conversations. Retrieved April 14, 2021 from https://ava.me/Google Scholar
- Internet ‘algospeak’ is changing our language in real time, from ‘nip nops’ to ‘le dollar bean.’ Washington Post. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/04/08/algospeak-tiktok-le-dollar-bean/Google Scholar
- TikTok Apologizes After Reportedly Censoring LGBTQ+ Users | Them. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from https://www.them.us/story/lgbtq-users-reportedly-being-censored-by-tiktokGoogle Scholar
- Months after TikTok apologized to Black creators, many say little has changed. NBC News. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/months-after-tiktok-apologized-black-creators-many-say-little-has-n1256726Google Scholar
- Certified Realtime Captioner (CRC) | NCRA. Retrieved July 11, 2022 from https://www.ncra.org/certification/NCRA-Certifications/certified-realtime-captionerGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Understanding Social and Environmental Factors to Enable Collective Access Approaches to the Design of Captioning Technology
Recommendations
Social, Environmental, and Technical: Factors at Play in the Current Use and Future Design of Small-Group Captioning
CSCW2Real-time captioning is a critical accessibility tool for many d/Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) people. While the vast majority of captioning work has focused on formal settings and technical innovations, in contrast, we investigate captioning for ...
“Easier or Harder, Depending on Who the Hearing Person Is”: Codesigning Videoconferencing Tools for Small Groups with Mixed Hearing Status
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWith improvements in automated speech recognition and increased use of videoconferencing, real-time captioning has changed significantly. This shift toward broadly available but less accurate captioning invites exploration of the role hearing ...
Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design
ASSETS '20: Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and AccessibilityAccessibility research and disability studies are intertwined fields focused on, respectively, building a world more inclusive of people with disability and understanding and elevating the lived experiences of disabled people. Accessibility research ...
Comments