skip to main content
article
Free Access

Relational Data-Base Management Systems

Published:01 March 1976Publication History
First page image

References

  1. SIGMOD/SIGFIDET The ACM Special Interest Group on the Management of Data (formerly named the Special Interest Group on File Description and Translation) holds an an- num Conference. The Proceedings of these con- ferences are available from ACM, New York. {IFIP TC-2} A Special Working Conference, "An In-Depth Evaluation of Codasyl DDL," was held in Bel- gium in January 1975. Proceedings of that con- ference are available in the book Database Description, B.C.M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, Eds. North-Holland Publ. Co., The Netherlands,Amsterdam'1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S1 CODASYL DATA BASE TASK GROUP, April 1971 report, ACM, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S2 CODASYL DATA DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE COMMITTEE, Data Description Language Journal of Development, Document C13.6/ 2:113, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S3 CODASYL PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE COM- MITTEE, CODASYL COBOL Journal of Development, Dept. of Supply and Services, Government of Canada, Technical Services Branch, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S4 CODASYL DATABASE LANGUAGE TASK GROUP, CODASYL Cobol database facility proposal, 1973, Dept. of Supply and Services, Government of Canada, Technical Services Branch, Ottawa, Canada. This document proposes revisions to CODASYL COBOL. The revisions, as accepted, appear in the latest version of the CODASYL Cobol Journal of Development, see {S3}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S5 CODASYL FORTRAN DML, information on the activities of this committee ' is available from Chairman, CODASYL FORTRAN DML Committee, P.O. Box 124, 928 Garden City Drive, Monroeville, Pa., 15146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S6 STACEY, G. M., "A FORTRAN interface to the CODASYL Data Base Task Group specifications," Computer J. 17, 2 (May 1974), 124-129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. N1 BACHMAN, C. W., "Data structure diagrams," Database 1, 2 (Summer 1969). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. N2 BACHMAN, C. W., "The evolution of storage structures," Comm. ACM 15, 7 (July 1972), 628-634. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N3 BACHMAN, C. W., "The programmer as navigator," Comm. ACM 16, 11 (Nov. 1973), 653-658. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. E1 FRANK, R. L.; AND SIBLEY, E. H., The Data Base Task Group Report: an illustrative example, Doc. No. AD-759-267, U.S. National Technical Information Service.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E2 PHILIPS DATA SYSTEMS, An application example of the CODASYL DBTG Proposal, Pub. No. 5122-991-24151, Philips-Electrologica, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E3 SIBLEY, E. H., The CODASYL database approach: a Cobol example of design and use of a personnel file, NBSIR 74-500, Institute of Computer Sciences and Techi nology, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. E4 TAYLOR, R. W., "Data administration and the DBTG ReporL" Proc. of ACM SIGMOD/SIGFIDET Conf., 1974, ACM, New York, pp. 431--444. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E5 MANOLA, F. A., Principles of the CODASYL approach to the description of dala structures, Report 3068, Naval Research Laboratory, 1975, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D1 BACHMAN, C. W., "The data structure set model," in Proc. 1975 ACM-SIGMOD Debate, "Data Models: Data Structure Set versus Relational," R. Rustin, (Ed.), ACM, New York, :PPA 1-10. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D2 CODD, E. F.; AND I)ATE, C. J. "Interactive support for non-programmers: the relational and network approaches," in Proe. 1975 ACM-~IGMOD Debate, "Data Models: Data Structure Set versus Relational," R. Rustin, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 13--41. ,, Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D3 DATE, C. J.; AND CODe, E. F., The relational and network approaches: comparison of the application programming interfaces," in Proc. 1975 ACM-SIGMOD Debate "Data Models: Data Structure Set versus Relational," R. Rustin (Ed.), ACM, New York,pp. 85-113. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D4 EARNEST, C. P., A comparison of the network and relational data structure models, Technical Report Sciences Corp., El Segundo, California, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D5 ENGELS, R.W., "An analysis of the April 1971 DBTG report," in Proc. 1971 ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access, and Control, ACM, New York, pp. 69-91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D6 METAXmES, A., "Information bearing and non-information bearing sets," in Proc. of IFIP TC-~ ~pecial Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of the CODASYL DDL~ '~ pp. 363-368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D7 OLLE, T.W., "Cut'rent and future trends in database management systems," in Proc. I FI P Congress, Information Processing 7~, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 998--1006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D8 WAGHORN, W. J., "The DDL as an industry standard?," in Proc. IFIP TC-~ Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of the CODASYL DDL," pp. 121-167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. R1 KAY, M. H., "An assessment of the CODASYL DDL for use with a relational sub-schema," in Proc. IFIP TC-~ Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 199- 214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. R2 NIJSSEN, G. M., "Set and CODASYL set or eoset," in Proc. IFIP TC-~ Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 1-71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. R3 OLLE, T. W., "An analysis of the flaws in the Schema DDL and proposed improvements," in Proc. IFIP TC-$ Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 283-297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. R4 ROBINSON, K. A., "An analysis of the uses of the CODASYL set concept," in Proc. IFIP TC-e Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 169-181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. R5 TAYLOR, R. W., "Observations on the attributes of database sets," in Proc. IFIP TC-~ Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 73-84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. R6 HAWLEY, D. A.; KNOWLES, J. S.; AND TOZER, E. E., "Database consistency and the CODASYL DBTG proposals," Computer J. 18, 3 (1975), 206-212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. C1 NIJSSEN, G. M., "Data structuring in the DDL and relational model," in Database Management, J. W. Klimbie, and K. L. Koffeman, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 363-384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. C2 McGEE, W. C., "A contribution to ~the study of data equivalence," in Database Management, J. W. Klimbie, and K. L. Koffeman, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. ~ Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 123-148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. C3 SENKO, M. E., "Data description language in the context of a multi-level structured description: DIAM I I with FORAL," in Proc. IFIP TC-~ Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp 239-257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. C4 SIBLEY, E .H ., On the eqmvalences of databased systems," in Proc. 1975 ACM- SIGMOD Debate, "Data Models: Data Structure Set versus Relational," R. Rustin, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 45-76. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. C5 STONEBRAKER, M.; AND HELD, G., "Networks, hierarchies, and relations in database management systems," in Proc. ACM Pacific 75 Regional Conf., ACM, New York, pp. 1-9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Al BACHMAN, C.W., "Implementation techniques for data structure sets," in Database Management System~, D. A. Jardine, (Ed.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 147-257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. A2 BAKER, G. J., "The correct use of CODASYL DBTG sets," Database Journal 6, 2, pp. 19-21. A. P. Publications Ltd., London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. A3 BROWN, A. P.G., "Modeling a real world system and designing a schema to represent i t ," in Proc. IFIP TC-$ Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 339- 347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. A4 BUBENKO, J. A., JR., et al., "From information structures to DBTG data struttures," in Proc. Conf., on Data: Abstraction, Definition, and Structure, ACM SIGPLAN/SIGMOD 1976, ACM, New York, pp. 73-84. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. A5 GERRITSEN, R., "A preliminary system for the design of DBTG data structures," Comm. ACM, 18, 10 (Oct. 1975), 551-557. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. A6 MITOMA, M. F.; AND IRANI, K.B., "Automatic database schema design and optimization," in Proe. of the Internatl. Conf. on Very Large Databases, 1975, ACM, New York, pp. 286-321.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. A7 TAYLOR, R.W., "When are pointer arrays better than chains," in Proc. ACM National Conf., 1974, ACM, New York, p. 735.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. U1 BANDURSKI, A. E. ; AND JEFFERSON, D .K ., "Data description for computeraided design," in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Internatl. Conf. on Management of Data, 1975, W. F. King, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 193-202. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. U2 CANNING, R. G., "What s happening with'CODASYL-type DBMS," EDP Analyzer, (Oct. 1974).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. U3 EMERSON, E. J., "DMS 1100 user experience," in Database Management Systems, D. A. Jardine, (Ed.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 35-46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. U4 LAVALLEE, P. A.; AND OHAYON, S., "DMS applications and experience," in Database Management Systems, D. A. Jardine, (Ed.), North-Holland, Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 47-67. . "lTma.p X erlenceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. U5 VON GOHREN, i.~. ~., .. e p ,, with integrated data store (IDS), in Database Management Systems, D. A. Jardine, (Ed.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 19-33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Il BACHMAN, C. W., AND WILLIAMS, S. B., "A general purpose programming system for random access memories," in Proc. AFIPS 1965 Fall Jr. Computer Conf., Vol. 26, Spartan Books, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 411-422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. I2 CANADAY, R. H., et al., "A back-end computer for database management," Comm. ACM 17, 10 (Oct. 1974), 575-582. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. I3 FOSSUM, B. M., "Database integrity as provided for by a particular database management system," in Database Management, J. W, Klimbie and K. L. Koffeman, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 271-288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. I4 JOHNSON, H. R., "A schema report facility for a CODASYL based data definition language," in Database Description, B. C. M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975, pp. 299-328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. I5 SCHENK, H., "Implementational aspects of the CODASYL DBTG proposal," in Database Management, J. W. Klimbie and K. L. Koffeman (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 399-412.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. I6 WARREN, THOMAS, Feature analysis of CODASYL database management systems, AD-A014 972/4WC, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. M1 ABRIAL, !" R., "Data semantics," in Database Management, J. W. Klimbie and K. L. Koffeman, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 1--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. M2 COLLMEYER, A.J., "Implications of data independence on the architecture of database management systems," in Proc. ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access, and Control, 1972, A. L. Dean, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 307-321. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. M3 EARNEST, C. P., "Selection and higher level structues in networks," in Database Description, B. C. M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, (Eds.), North-Holland Puhl. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975, pp. 215-237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. M4 EVEREST, G. C.; AND SIBLEY, E. H., "Critique of the GUIDE-SHARE DBMS requirements," in Proc. ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control, 1971, E. F. Codd and A. L. Dean, (Eds.), ACM, New York, pp. 93-112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. M5 GUIDE-SHARE DATABASE REQUIREMENTS GRouP, Database management system requirements, 1970, SHARE, Inc., New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. M6 HUITS, M. H. H., "Requirements for languages in database systems," in Database Description, B. C. M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975, pp. 85-109. ,,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. M7 McGEE, W.C., File level operations on network data structures," in P~oc. ACM SIGMOD Internatl. Conf. on Management of Data, 1974, W. F. King, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 32-47. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. M8 OLLE, T. W., An asa~sment of how the CODASYL data base task group proposal meets the UUIDE-Su4~z requtreraents, Report 329 Norwegian Computing Center, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. M9 SENKO, M. E., et al., "Data structures and accessing in database systems." IBM Systems J. lg, 1, (1973), 30--93. "Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. M10 STEEL, T. B., Ja., Database standardization: a status report," in Database Deseription, B. C. M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975_pp. 183-198. Also in Proc. ACM 8IOMOD Internatl. Conf. on Management of Data, 1975, W. F. King, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 149-156. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Mll PARSONS, R. G.; DALE, A. G.; xNn YUR- KANEN, C. V., "Data manipulation language requirements for database management systems," Computer J. 17, 2 (May 1974), 99-103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. G1 DODD, G. G., "Elements of data management systems," Computing ~urveys ~ 1, 2 (June 1969), 117-133. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. G2 MOLER, C., "Matrix computations with FORTRAN and paging, Comm. ACM 1~, 4 (April 1972), 268-270. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. G3 SEVERANCE, D. G.; Arm DVHNE, R. A., "A practitioner's guide to addressing algorithms," Comm. ACM, (publication pending). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. G4 NIJSSEN, G.M., "Efficient batch updating of a random file," in Proc. ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access, and Control, 1971, E. F. Codd and A. L. Dean, (Eds.), ACM, New York, pp. 173-186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. G5 DATE, C. J., An introduction to database systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM Computing Surveys
    ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 8, Issue 1
    March 1976
    148 pages
    ISSN:0360-0300
    EISSN:1557-7341
    DOI:10.1145/356662
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 1976 ACM

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 March 1976
    Published in csur Volume 8, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader