- SIGMOD/SIGFIDET The ACM Special Interest Group on the Management of Data (formerly named the Special Interest Group on File Description and Translation) holds an annum Conference. The Proceedings of these conferences are available from ACM, New York.Google Scholar
- IFIP TC-2 A Special Working Conference, "An In-Depth Evaluation of Codasyl DDL," was held in Belgium in January 1975. Proceedings of that conference are available in the book Database Description, B.C.M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, Eds. North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975.Google Scholar
- S1 CODASYL DATA BASE TASK GROUP, April 1971 report, ACM, New York.Google Scholar
- S2 CODASYL DATA DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE COMMITTEE, Data Description Language Journal of Development, Document C13.6/ 2:113, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- S3 CODASYL PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE COM- MITTEE, CODASYL COBOL Journal of Development, Dept. of Supply and Services, Government of Canada, Technical Services Branch, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
- S4 CODASYL DATABASE LANGUAGE TASK GROUP, CODASYL Cobol database facility proposal, 1973, Dept. of Supply and Services, Government of Canada, Technical Services Branch, Ottawa, Canada. This document proposes revisions to CODASYL COBOL. The revisions, as accepted, appear in the latest version of the CODASYL Cobol Journal of Development, see {S3}.Google Scholar
- S5 CODASYL FORTRAN DML, information on the activities of this committee' is available from Chairman, CODASYL FORTRAN DML Committee, P.O. Box 124, 928 Garden City Drive, Monroeville, Pa., 15146.Google Scholar
- S6 STACEY, G. M., "A FORTRAN interface to the CODASYL Data Base Task Group specifications," Computer J. 17, 2 (May 1974), 124-129.Google Scholar
- N1 BACHMAN, C. W., "Data structure diagrams," Database 1, 2 (Summer 1969). Google Scholar
- N2 BACHMAN, C. W., "The evolution of storage structures," Comm. ACM 15, 7 (July 1972), 628-634. Google Scholar
- N3 BACHMAN, C. W., "The programmer as navigator," Comm. ACM 16, 11 (Nov. 1973), 653-658. Google Scholar
- E1 FRANK, R. L.; AND SIBLEY, E. H., The Data Base Task Group Report: an illustrative example, Doc. No. AD-759-267, U.S. National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
- E2 PHILIPS DATA SYSTEMS, An application example of the CODASYL DBTG Proposal, Pub. No. 5122-991-24151, Philips-Electrologica, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands, 1973.Google Scholar
- E3 SIBLEY, E. H., The CODASYL database approach: a Cobol example of design and use of a personnel file, NBSIR 74-500, Institute of Computer Sciences and Technology, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- E4 TAYLOR, R. W., "Data administration and the DBTG ReporL" Proc. of ACM SIGMOD/SIGFIDET Conf., 1974, ACM, New York, pp. 431--444. Google Scholar
- E5 MANOLA, F. A., Principles of the CODASYL approach to the description of dala structures, Report 3068, Naval Research Laboratory, 1975, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- D1 BACHMAN, C. W., "The data structure set model," in Proc. 1975 ACM-SIGMOD Debate, "Data Models: Data Structure Set versus Relational," R. Rustin, (Ed.), ACM, New York, :PPA 1-10. Google Scholar
- D2 CODD, E. F.; AND DATE, C. J. "Interactive support for non-programmers: the relational and network approaches," in Proe. 1975 ACM-SIGMOD Debate, "Data Models: Data Structure Set versus Relational," R. Rustin, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 13--41. Google Scholar
- D3 DATE, C. J.; AND CODe, E. F., The relational and network approaches: comparison of the application programming interfaces," in Proc. 1975 ACM-SIGMOD Debate "Data Models: Data Structure Set versus Relational," R. Rustin (Ed.), ACM, New York,pp. 85-113. Google Scholar
- D4 EARNEST, C. P., A comparison of the network and relational data structure models, Technical Report Sciences Corp., El Segundo, California, 1974.Google Scholar
- D5 ENGELS, R.W., "An analysis of the April 1971 DBTG report," in Proc. 1971 ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access, and Control, ACM, New York, pp. 69-91.Google Scholar
- D6 METAXmES, A., "Information bearing and non-information bearing sets," in Proc. of IFIP TC-s Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of the CODASYL DDL," pp. 363-368.Google Scholar
- D7 OLLE, T.W., "Cut'rent and future trends in database management systems," in Proc. IFIP Congress, Information Processing 74, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 998-1006.Google Scholar
- D8 WAGHORN, W. J., "The DDL as an industry standard?," in Proc. IFIP TC-2 Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of the CODASYL DDL," pp. 121-167.Google Scholar
- R1 KAY, M. H., "An assessment of the CODASYL DDL for use with a relational sub-schema," in Proc. IFIP TC-2 Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 199- 214.Google Scholar
- R2 NIJSSEN, G. M., "Set and CODASYL set or eoset," in Proc. IFIP TC-2 Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 1-71.Google Scholar
- R3 OLLE, T. W., "An analysis of the flaws in the Schema DDL and proposed improvements," in Proc. IFIP TC-2 Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 283-297.Google Scholar
- R4 ROBINSON, K. A., "An analysis of the uses of the CODASYL set concept," in Proc. IFIP TC-e Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 169-181.Google Scholar
- R5 TAYLOR, R. W., "Observations on the attributes of database sets," in Proc. IFIP TC-2 Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 73-84.Google Scholar
- R6 HAWLEY, D. A.; KNOWLES, J. S.; AND TOZER, E. E., "Database consistency and the CODASYL DBTG proposals," Computer J. 18, 3 (1975), 206-212.Google Scholar
- C1 NIJSSEN, G. M., "Data structuring in the DDL and relational model," in Database Management, J. W. Klimbie, and K. L. Koffeman, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 363-384.Google Scholar
- C2 McGEE, W. C., "A contribution to the study of data equivalence," in Database Management, J. W. Klimbie, and K. L. Koffeman, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 123-148.Google Scholar
- C3 SENKO, M. E., "Data description language in the context of a multi-level structured description: DIAM I I with FORAL," in Proc. IFIP TC-2 Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp 239-257.Google Scholar
- C4 SIBLEY, E .H ., On the eqmvalences of databased systems," in Proc. 1975 ACM- SIGMOD Debate, "Data Models: Data Structure Set versus Relational," R. Rustin, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 45-76. Google Scholar
- C5 STONEBRAKER, M.; AND HELD, G., "Networks, hierarchies, and relations in database management systems," in Proc. ACM Pacific 75 Regional Conf., ACM, New York, pp. 1-9.Google Scholar
- A1 BACHMAN, C.W., "Implementation techniques for data structure sets," in Database Management Systems, D. A. Jardine, (Ed.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 147-257.Google Scholar
- A2 BAKER, G. J., "The correct use of CODASYL DBTG sets," Database Journal 6, 2, pp. 19-21. A. P. Publications Ltd., London.Google Scholar
- A3 BROWN, A. P.G., "Modeling a real world system and designing a schema to represent it," in Proc. IFIP TC-2 Special Working Conf., "An In-depth Technical Evaluation of CODASYL DDL," pp. 339- 347.Google Scholar
- A4 BUBENKO, J. A., JR., et al., "From information structures to DBTG data struttures," in Proc. Conf., on Data: Abstraction, Definition, and Structure, ACM SIGPLAN/SIGMOD 1976, ACM, New York, pp. 73-84. Google Scholar
- A5 GERRITSEN, R., "A preliminary system for the design of DBTG data structures," Comm. ACM, 18, 10 (Oct. 1975), 551-557. Google Scholar
- A6 MITOMA, M. F.; AND IRANI, K.B., "Automatic database schema design and optimization," in Proe. of the Internatl. Conf. on Very Large Databases, 1975, ACM, New York, pp. 286-321.Google Scholar
- A7 TAYLOR, R.W., "When are pointer arrays better than chains," in Proc. ACM National Conf., 1974, ACM, New York, p. 735.Google Scholar
- U1 BANDURSKI, A. E.; AND JEFFERSON, D. K., "Data description for computeraided design," in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Internatl. Conf. on Management of Data, 1975, W. F. King, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 193-202. Google Scholar
- U2 CANNING, R. G., "What's happening with'CODASYL-type DBMS," EDP Analyzer, (Oct. 1974).Google Scholar
- U3 EMERSON, E. J., "DMS 1100 user experience," in Database Management Systems, D. A. Jardine, (Ed.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 35-46.Google Scholar
- U4 LAVALLEE, P. A.; AND OHAYON, S., "DMS applications and experience," in Database Management Systems, D. A. Jardine, (Ed.), North-Holland, Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 47-67. .Google Scholar
- U5 VON GOHREN, G. L., "User experience with integrated data store (IDS), in Database Management Systems, D. A. Jardine, (Ed.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 19-33.Google Scholar
- I1 BACHMAN, C. W., AND WILLIAMS, S. B., "A general purpose programming system for random access memories," in Proc. AFIPS 1965 Fall Jr. Computer Conf., Vol. 26, Spartan Books, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 411-422.Google Scholar
- I2 CANADAY, R. H., et al., "A back-end computer for database management," Comm. ACM 17, 10 (Oct. 1974), 575-582. Google Scholar
- I3 FOSSUM, B. M., "Database integrity as provided for by a particular database management system," in Database Management, J. W, Klimbie and K. L. Koffeman, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 271-288.Google Scholar
- I4 JOHNSON, H. R., "A schema report facility for a CODASYL based data definition language," in Database Description, B. C. M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975, pp. 299-328.Google Scholar
- I5 SCHENK, H., "Implementational aspects of the CODASYL DBTG proposal," in Database Management, J. W. Klimbie and K. L. Koffeman (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 399-412.Google Scholar
- I6 WARREN, THOMAS, Feature analysis of CODASYL database management systems, AD-A014 972/4WC, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 1975.Google Scholar
- M1 ABRIAL, J. R., "Data semantics," in Database Management, J. W. Klimbie and K. L. Koffeman, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, pp. 1--60.Google Scholar
- M2 COLLMEYER, A.J., "Implications of data independence on the architecture of database management systems," in Proc. ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access, and Control, 1972, A. L. Dean, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 307-321. Google Scholar
- M3 EARNEST, C. P., "Selection and higher level structues in networks," in Database Description, B. C. M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975, pp. 215-237.Google Scholar
- M4 EVEREST, G. C.; AND SIBLEY, E. H., "Critique of the GUIDE-SHARE DBMS requirements," in Proc. ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control, 1971, E. F. Codd and A. L. Dean, (Eds.), ACM, New York, pp. 93-112.Google Scholar
- M5 GUIDE-SHARE DATABASE REQUIREMENTS GRouP, Database management system requirements, 1970, SHARE, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
- M6 HUITS, M. H. H., "Requirements for languages in database systems," in Database Description, B. C. M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975, pp. 85-109.Google Scholar
- M7 McGEE, W.C., File level operations on network data structures," in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Internatl. Conf. on Management of Data, 1974, W. F. King, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 32-47. Google Scholar
- M8 OLLE, T. W., An assessment of how the CODASYL data base task group proposal meets the UUIDE-SHARE requtreraents, Report 329 Norwegian Computing Center, 1972.Google Scholar
- M9 SENKO, M. E., et al., "Data structures and accessing in database systems." IBM Systems J. lg, 1, (1973), 30--93.Google Scholar
- M10 STEEL, T. B., Ja., Database standardization: a status report," in Database Deseription, B. C. M. Douque and G. M. Nijssen, (Eds.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975 pp. 183-198. Also in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Internatl. Conf. on Management of Data, 1975, W. F. King, (Ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 149-156. Google Scholar
- M11 PARSONS, R. G.; DALE, A. G.; AND YUR- KANEN, C. V., "Data manipulation language requirements for database management systems," Computer J. 17, 2 (May 1974), 99-103.Google Scholar
- G1 DODD, G. G., "Elements of data management systems," Computing surveys 1, 2 (June 1969), 117-133. Google Scholar
- G2 MOLER, C., "Matrix computations with FORTRAN and paging, Comm. ACM 15, 4 (April 1972), 268-270. Google Scholar
- G3 SEVERANCE, D. G.; Arm DVHNE, R. A., "A practitioner's guide to addressing algorithms," Comm. ACM, (publication pending). Google Scholar
- G4 NIJSSEN, G.M., "Efficient batch updating of a random file," in Proc. ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access, and Control, 1971, E. F. Codd and A. L. Dean, (Eds.), ACM, New York, pp. 173-186.Google Scholar
- G5 DATE, C. J., An introduction to database systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975. Google Scholar
Recommendations
Data base languages, in particular DDL, development at CODASYL
SIGFIDET '74: Proceedings of the 1974 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) workshop on Data description, access and controlSince the publication, in April, 1971, of the Data Base Task Group(DBTG) report(ref.1) to the CODASYL Programming Language (=COBOL) Committee(PLC) several committees and task groups of the CODASYL organization have enhanced and improved the languages ...
The 78 CODASYL database model: a comparison with preceding specifications
SIGMOD '80: Proceedings of the 1980 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of dataThis paper compares the database model specified by the CODAYSL Data Definition Language Committee in its 1978 Journal of Development and the prior model, known familiarly as the CODASYL DBTG model, as specified in 1973 and 1971. The primary achievement ...
Logical, internal, and physical reference behavior in CODASYL database systems
This work investigates one aspect of the performance of CODASYL database systems: the data reference behavior. We introduce a model of database traversals at three levels: the logical, internal, and physical levels. The mapping between the logical and ...
Comments