skip to main content
10.1145/365024.365119acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Eye gaze patterns in conversations: there is more to conversational agents than meets the eyes

Published:01 March 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

In multi-agent, multi-user environments, users as well as agents should have a means of establishing who is talking to whom. In this paper, we present an experiment aimed at evaluating whether gaze directional cues of users could be used for this purpose. Using an eye tracker, we measured subject gaze at the faces of conversational partners during four-person conversations. Results indicate that when someone is listening or speaking to individuals, there is indeed a high probability that the person looked at is the person listened (p=88%) or spoken to (p=77%). We conclude that gaze is an excellent predictor of conversational attention in multiparty conversations. As such, it may form a reliable source of input for conversational systems that need to establish whom the user is speaking or listening to. We implemented our findings in FRED, a multi-agent conversational system that uses eye input to gauge which agent the user is listening or speaking to.

References

  1. 1.Argyle,M.The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour .London:Penguin Books,1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Argyle,M.Social Interaction .London:Tavistock Publications,1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Argyle,M.and Cook,M.Ga e and Mutual Gaze . London:Cambridge University Press,1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Argyle,M.and Dean,J.Eye-contact,Distance and Affiliation .Sociometry 28,1965,pp.289-304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.Argyle,M.and Graham,J.The Central Europe Experiment -Looking at Persons and Looking at Things .Journal of Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behaviour 1,1977,pp.6-16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6.Argyle,M.,Lalljee,M.,and Cook,M.The Effects of Visibility on Interaction in a Dyad .Human Relations 21,1968,pp.3-17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. 7.Brady,P.T.A Statistical Analysis of On-off Patterns in 16 Conversations .The Bell System Technical Journal (Jan.)1968,pp.73-91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Cassell,J.,Bickmore,T.,et al.Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces:Rea.In Proceedings of CHI '99.Pittsburgh,PA:ACM,1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Jaffe J.and Feldstein S.Rhythms of Dialogue .New York:Academic Press,1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Kendon,A.Some Functions of Gaze Direction in Social Interaction .Acta Psychologica 32,1967,pp.1- 25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.LC Technologies,Inc.The Eyegaze Communication System .Fairfax,VA:http://www.eyegaze.com ,1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Mobbs,N.A.Eye-contact in Relation to Social Introversion-Extraversion .British Journal of Social Clinical Psychology 7(305-306),1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Nijholt,A.and Hulstijn,J.Multimodal Interactions with Agents in Virtual Worlds.In Future Directions for Intelligent Information Systems and Information Science N.Kasabov (ed.),Physica-Verlag:Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 45,2000,pp.148-173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14.Sellen A.J.Speech Patterns in Video-Mediated Conversations.In Proceedings of CHI '92.Monterey, CA:ACM,1992,pp.49-59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Velichkovsky,B.and Hansen,J.P.New Technological Windows to Mind:There is More in Eyes and Brains for Human Computer Interaction.In Proceedings of CHI '96.Vancouver,Canada:ACM,1996,pp.496- 503. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Vertegaal,R.The GAZE Groupware System: Mediating Joint Attention in Multiparty Communication and Collaboration.In Proceedings of CHI '99.Pittsburg,PA:ACM,1999,pp.294-301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Vertegaal,R.Look Who's Talking to Whom .PhD Thesis.Enschede,The Netherlands:Cognitive Ergonomics Department,Twente University,1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Vertegaal,R.Slagter R.Van der Veer,G.C.and Nijholt,A.Why Conversational Agents Should Catch the Eye.In Extended Abstracts of CHI '2000.The Hague,The Netherlands:ACM,2000,pp.257-258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Vertegaal,R.Van der Veer,G.C.and Vons,H. Effects of Gaze on Multiparty Mediated Communication.In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000.Montreal,Canada:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,2000,pp.95-102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Waters,K.and Frisbee,J.A Coordinated Muscle Model for Speech Animation.In Proceedings of Graphics Interface '95.Canada,1995,pp.163-170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Weisbrod,R.M.Looking Behavior in a Discussion Group.Unpublished paper,Department of Psychology, Cornell University,1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Eye gaze patterns in conversations: there is more to conversational agents than meets the eyes

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          March 2001
          559 pages
          ISBN:1581133278
          DOI:10.1145/365024

          Copyright © 2001 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 March 2001

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '01 Paper Acceptance Rate69of352submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader