skip to main content
10.1145/365024.365121acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The impact of eye gaze on communication using humanoid avatars

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe an experiment designed to investigate the importance of eye gaze in humanoid avatar's representing people engaged in conversation. We compare responses to dyadic conversations in four mediated conditions: video, audio-only, and two avatar conditions. The avatar conditions differed only in their treatment of eye gaze. In the random-gaze condition the avatars head and eye animations were unrelated to conversational flow. In the informed-gaze condition, they were related to turn-taking during the conversation. The head animations were tracked and the eye animations were inferred from the audio stream. Our comparative analysis of 100 post-experiment questionnaires showed that the random-gaze avatar did not improve on audio-only communication. The informed-gaze avatar significantly outperformed the random-gaze model and also outperformed audio-only on several response measures. We conclude that an avatar whose gaze behaviour is related to the conversation provides a marked improvement on an avatar that merely exhibits liveliness.

References

  1. 1.Anstis, S.M., Mayhew, J.W., Morley, T. The Perception of Where a Face or Television 'Portrait' is Looking. American Journal of Psychology 82 (1969), 474-489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.Argyle, M., Bodily Communication. Methuen & Co., London, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Argyle, M. and Cook, M. Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Argyle, M. and Ingham, R. Mutual Gaze and Proximity. Semiotica 6 (1972), 32-49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.Argyle, M., Ingham, R., Alkema, F. and McCallin, M. The Different Functions of Gaze. Semiotica 7 (1973), 10- 32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Argyle, M., Lefebvre, L. and Cook, M. The Meaning of Five Patterns of Gaze. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 4, 2 (1974), 125-136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. 7.Buxton, W. Telepresence: integrating shared task and person spaces, in Proceedings of Graphics Interface '92, 123-129. Earlier version appears in Proceedings of Groupware '91 (Amsterdam, Oct. 29, 1991), 27-36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Colburn, A., Drucker, S., Cohen, M. The Role of Eye- Gaze in Avatar-Mediated Conversational Interfaces, in Sketches and Applications, Siggraph '00 (New Orleans LA, July '00), ACM Press, 253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Gibson, J.J. and Pick, A. Perception of Another Person's Looking Behaviour. American Journal of Psychology 46 (1963), 386-394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S. and Greenhalgh, C. Fragmented Interaction: Establishing Mutual Orientation in Virtual Environments, in Proceedings of CSCW '98 (Seattle WA, November 1998), 48-53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Isaacs, E. and Tang, J. What Video Can and Can't Do for Collaboration: A Case Study. Multimedia Systems, 2 (1993), 63-73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Kendon, A. Some Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26 (1967), 22-63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13.Kendon, M. and Cook, A. The Consistency of Gaze Patterns in Social Interaction. Br. J. Psychol, 60, 4 (1969), 481-494.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Lord, C. and Haith, M.M. The Perception of Eye Contact. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 3 (1974), 413-416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15.McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J.A. Generalised Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. 16.Sellen, A. Remote Conversations: The Effects of Mediating Talk with Technology. Human-Computer Interaction, 10(4) (1995), 401-444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons, London, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Slater, M., Steed, A., McCarthy, J., Maringelli, F. (1998) The Influence of Body Movement on Subjective Presence in Virtual Environments. Human Factors, 40(3), 469- 477.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Slater, M., Howell, J., Steed, A., Pertaub, D-P., Garau, M. and Springel, S. Acting in Virtual Reality, in ACM Collaborative Virtual Environments, (San Francisco CA, Sept 2000), 103-110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Steed, A. Slater, M., Sadagic, A. Tromp, J. and Bullock, A. Leadership and collaboration in virtual environments. In IEEE Virtual Reality, (Houston TX, March 1999), 112-115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Straus, S. and McGrath, J.E. Does the Medium Matter: The Interaction of Task and Technology on Group Performance and Member Reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (1994), 87-97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Taylor, M.J. and Rowe, S.R. Gaze Communication Using Semantically Consistent Spaces, in Proceedings of CHI 2000 (The Hague, Amsterdam, April 2000), ACM Press, 400-407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.Vertegaal, R. The GAZE Groupware System: Mediating Joint Attention in Multiparty Communication and Collaboration, in Proceedings of CHI '99 (Pittsburgh PA, May 1999), ACM Press, 294-301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.Vilhjalmsson, H. and Cassell, J. BodyChat: Autonomous Communicative Behaviours in Avatars, in Autonomous Agents '98 (Minneapolis MN, May 1998), 269-276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The impact of eye gaze on communication using humanoid avatars

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                CHI '01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                March 2001
                559 pages
                ISBN:1581133278
                DOI:10.1145/365024

                Copyright © 2001 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 March 2001

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                CHI '01 Paper Acceptance Rate69of352submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader