skip to main content
10.1145/964442.964449acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Designing example-critiquing interaction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 January 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

In many practical scenarios, users are faced with the problem of choosing the most preferred outcome from a large set of possibilities. As people are unable to sift through them manually, decisions support systems are often used to automatically find the optimal solution. A crucial requirement for such a system is to have an accurate model of the user's preferences.Studies have shown that people are usually unable to accurately state their preferences up front, but are greatly helped by seeing examples of actual solutions. Thus, several researchers have proposed preference elicitation strategies based on example critiquing. The essential design question in example critiquing is what examples to show users in order to best help them locate their most preferred solution.In this paper, we analyze this question based on two requirements. The first is that it must stimulate the user to express further preferences by showing the range of alternatives available. The second is that the examples that are shown must contain the solution that the user would consider optimal if the currently expressed preference model was complete so that he select it as a final solution.

References

  1. C. Boutilier, R. Brafman, C. Geib, and D. Poole: "A Constraint-Based Approach to Preference Elicitation and Decision Making," AAAI Spring Symposium on Qualitative Decision Theory, Stanford, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Burke, K. Hammond, and B. Young: "The findme approach to assisted browsing," IEEE Expert 12(4), pp. 32--40, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Carenini and D. Poole: "Constructed Preferences and Value-focused Thinking: Implications for AI research on Preference Elicitation," AAAI-02 Workshop on Preferences in AI and CP: symbolic approaches - Edmonton, Canada, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Doyle and R. Thomason: "Background to qualitative decision theory," AI Magazine 20(2), Summer 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. B. Faltings, M. Torrens and P. Pu: "Solution generation with qualitative models of preferences," to appear in Computational Intelligence, special issue on qualitative decision theory, 2004, available at http:\\liawww.epfl.ch\~ faltings\compint-2004.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. V. Ha and P. Haddawy: "Problem-focused incremental elicitation of multiattribute utility models," 13th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 215--222, August 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. V. Ha and P. Haddawy: "Toward Case-Based Preference Elicitation: Similarity Measures on Preference Structures," 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R.Keeney and H. Raiffa: "Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs," Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Keeney: "Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making," Harvard University Press, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. G. Linden, S. Hanks, and N. Lesh: "Interactive assessment of user preference models: The automated travel assistant," In Proceedings of User Modeling '97, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J.W. Payne, J.R. Bettman and E.J. Johnson: "The Adaptive Decision Maker," Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Pu and B. Faltings: "Enriching Buyers' experiences: the SmartClient Approach," ACM SIGCHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 289--296, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Shearin and H. Lieberman: "Intelligent Profiling by Example," International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2001), pp. 145--152, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Stolze: "Soft Navigation in electronic product catalogs," International Journal on Digital Libraries 3(1), pp. 60--66, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Torrens, R. Weigel and B. Faltings: "Java Constraint Library: bringing constraint technology on the Internet using the Java language," Workshop on Constraints and Agents (AAAI97), AAAI Technical Report WS-97-05, July 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Torrens, B. Faltings and P. Pu: "SmartClients: Constraint Satisfaction as a Paradigm for Scaleable Intelligent Information Systems," CONSTRAINTS 7, p. 49--69, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Torrens, P. Hertzog, L. Samson and B. Faltings: "reality: a Scalable Intelligent Travel Planer, Decision Support for the Business Traveler," 18th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Melbourne, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing example-critiquing interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '04: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      January 2004
      396 pages
      ISBN:1581138156
      DOI:10.1145/964442

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 January 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      IUI '04 Paper Acceptance Rate72of140submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader