skip to main content
research-article

Retrieving regions of interest for user exploration

Published:01 May 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We consider an application scenario where points of interest (PoIs) each have a web presence and where a web user wants to identify a region that contains relevant PoIs that are relevant to a set of keywords, e.g., in preparation for deciding where to go to conveniently explore the PoIs. Motivated by this, we propose the length-constrained maximum-sum region (LCMSR) query that returns a spatial-network region that is located within a general region of interest, that does not exceed a given size constraint, and that best matches query keywords. Such a query maximizes the total weight of the PoIs in it w.r.t. the query keywords. We show that it is NP-hard to answer this query. We develop an approximation algorithm with a (5 + ε) approximation ratio utilizing a technique that scales node weights into integers. We also propose a more efficient heuristic algorithm and a greedy algorithm. Empirical studies on real data offer detailed insight into the accuracy of the proposed algorithms and show that the proposed algorithms are capable of computing results efficiently and effectively.

References

  1. X. Cao, L. Chen, G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, Q. Qu, A. Skovsgaard, D. Wu, and M. L. Yiu. Spatial keyword querying. In ER, pages 16--29, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. X. Cao, G. Cong, and C. S. Jensen. Retrieving top-k prestige-based relevant spatial web objects. PVLDB, 3(1):373--384, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. X. Cao, G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and B. C. Ooi. Collective spatial keyword querying. In SIGMOD, pages 373--384, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D.-W. Choi, C.-W. Chung, and Y. Tao. A scalable algorithm for maximizing range sum in spatial databases. PVLDB, 5(11):1088--1099, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and D. Wu. Efficient retrieval of the top-k most relevant spatial web objects. PVLDB, 2(1):337--348, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. I. De Felipe, V. Hristidis, and N. Rishe. Keyword search on spatial databases. In ICDE, pages 656--665, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. N. Durlauf and L. E. Blume. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd edition, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. N. Garg. A 3-approximation for the minimum tree spanning k vertices. In FOCS, pages 302--309, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. X. Goemans and D. P. Williamson. A general approximation technique for constrained forest problems. SIAM J. Comput., 24(2):296--317, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Hariharan, B. Hore, C. Li, and S. Mehrotra. Processing spatial-keyword (SK) queries in geographic information retrieval (GIR) systems. In SSDBM, page 16, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Liu, G. Yu, and H. Sun. Subject-oriented top-k hot region queries in spatial dataset. In CIKM, pages 2409--2412, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. C. Long, R. C.-W. Wong, K. Wang, and A. W.-C. Fu. Collective spatial keyword queries: a distance owner-driven approach. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 689--700, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. M. Ponte and W. B. Croft. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 275--281, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Ravi, R. Sundaram, M. V. Marathe, D. J. Rosenkrantz, and S. S. Ravi. Spanning trees short or small. In SODA, pages 546--555, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. B. Rocha-Junior and K. Nørvåg. Top-k spatial keyword queries on road networks. In EDBT, pages 168--179, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y. Tao, X. Hu, D. Choi, and C. Chung. Approximate MaxRS in spatial databases. PVLDB, 6(13):1546--1557, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. X. Xiao, Q. Luo, Z. Li, X. Xie, and W.-Y. Ma. A large-scale study on map search logs. TWEB, 4(3):1--33, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Zhang, Y. M. Chee, A. Mondal, A. K. H. Tung, and M. Kitsuregawa. Keyword search in spatial databases: Towards searching by document. In ICDE, pages 688--699, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Zhang, B. C. Ooi, and A. K. H. Tung. Locating mapped resources in web 2.0. In ICDE, pages 521--532, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Y. Zhou, X. Xie, C. Wang, Y. Gong, and W.-Y. Ma. Hybrid index structures for location-based web search. In CIKM, pages 155--162, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Zobel and A. Moffat. Inverted files for text search engines. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(2):6, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
    Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment  Volume 7, Issue 9
    May 2014
    124 pages
    ISSN:2150-8097
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    VLDB Endowment

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 May 2014
    Published in pvldb Volume 7, Issue 9

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader