skip to main content
10.1145/2390867.2390870acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Significance of visual interfaces in institutional and user-generated databases with category structures

Published:02 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we visually explore the data structure of two different visual platforms: the database behind the social environment of a social networking site, and the intricate infrastructure of a research institute for preservation of deposited datasets. We argue that visual analytics of metadata of collections can be used in multiple ways: for the backend users, to inform the archive about structure and growth of its collection; to foster collection strategies; and to check metadata consistency, for the end-users, to give an overview to the collections, and thus to generate more awareness of the collection and its metadata, to give the enduser extra information to contextualize the entirety of the archive. We conclude with a discussion on how text based search combined with different type of visually enhanced browsing improves data access, navigation, and reuse in these two radically different contexts.

References

  1. A. A. Akdag Salah. The online potential of art creation and dissemination: deviantART as the next art venue. Proc. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. A. Akdag Salah, A. A. Salah, B. Buter, N. Dijkshoorn, D. Modolo, Q. Nguyen, S. van Noort, and B. van de Poel. DeviantArt in spotlight: A network of artists. Leonardo, 45(5), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Borgman. Why are online catalogs still hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7):493--503, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. Börner and C. Chen. Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries: Motivation, Utilization, and Socio-technical Challenges. LNCS. Springer, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Breeding. AquaBrowser. Library Technology Reports, 43(4):15--18, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Heer and D. Boyd. Vizster: Visualizing online social networks. In INFOVIS, pages 32--39, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. B. Shneiderman, D. Feldman, A. Rose, and X. Grau. Visualizing digital library search results with categorical and hierarchical axes. In Proc. ACM Conf. on Digital libraries, pages 57--66, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. Viégas, M. Wattenberg, and J. Feinberg. Participatory visualization with Wordle. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6):1137--1144, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Significance of visual interfaces in institutional and user-generated databases with category structures

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader