skip to main content
10.1145/2513002.2513016acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Watch your steps: designing a semi-public display to promote physical activity

Published:30 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sedentary time is considered a health risk factor, even when it is compensated with some exercise. Frequent activities of minimal physical exertion throughout the day like walking or climbing stairs are therefore recommended. To promote these activities through social play and collective awareness, we designed a semi-public display that shows the step count of a group of players in near real-time, using a wearable self-monitoring device that senses their physical activity. We included a fictional player that walked at constant speed during the whole day to promote a shared goal. Our preliminary findings suggest that the display motivated players to use a self-monitoring device everyday and enabled new conversations among players without producing privacy issues. Emotional connections with non-collocated participants and creative ways of cheating were also observed. We believe our work highlights the opportunities to extend the potential of self-monitoring devices, which require little effort and resources to be implemented.

References

  1. Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Consolvo, S., McDonald, D. W., Toscos, T., Chen, M. Y., Froehlich, J., Harrison, B., Klasnja, P., LaMarca, A., LeGrand, L., Libby, R., Smith, I., and Landay, J. A. 2008. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, 2008), ACM, 1797--1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Duvivier, B. M., Schaper, N. C., Bremers, M. A., van Crombrugge, G., Menheere, P. P., Kars, M., and Savelberg, H. H. 2013. Minimal Intensity Physical Activity (Standing and Walking) of Longer Duration Improves Insulin Action and Plasma Lipids More than Shorter Periods of Moderate to Vigorous Exercise (Cycling) in Sedentary Subjects When Energy Expenditure Is Comparable. PloS one. 8(2), e55542.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Foster, D., Linehan, C., Kirman, B., Lawson, S., and James, G. 2010. Motivating physical activity at work: using persuasive social media for competitive step counting. In Proceedings of the 14th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (Tampere, Finland, 2010), ACM, 111--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hekler, E. B., Klasnja, P., Froehlich, J. E., and Buman, M. P. 2013. Mind the Theoretical Gap: Interpreting, Using, and Developing Behavioral Theory in HCI Research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France, 2013), ACM, 3307--3316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Huang, E. M. and Mynatt, E. D. 2003. Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (Ft. Lauderdale, USA, 2003), 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lin, J. J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., and Strub, H. B. 2006. Fish "n" Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In Proceedings of UbiComp (California, USA, 2006), Springer, 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mueller, F. F., Gibbs, M. R., and Vetere, F. 2008. Taxonomy of exertion games. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat (Cairns, Australia, 2008), ACM, 263--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Prochaska, J. O. and DiClemente, C. C. 1983. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 51, 3 (Jun. 1983), 390--395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Proper, K. I., Singh, A. S., Van Mechelen, W., and Chinapaw, M. J. 2011. Sedentary Behaviors and Health Outcomes Among Adults: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 40, 2 (Feb. 2011), 174--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist. 55(1), (2000), 68--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Salen, K. and Zimmerman, E. 2004. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Vorderer, P., Hartmann, T., and Klimmt, C. 2003. Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: the role of competition. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Entertainment computing (Pittsburgh, USA, 2003), 1--9 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Watch your steps: designing a semi-public display to promote physical activity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IE '13: Proceedings of The 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Matters of Life and Death
      September 2013
      243 pages
      ISBN:9781450322546
      DOI:10.1145/2513002

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      IE '13 Paper Acceptance Rate20of51submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate64of148submissions,43%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader