Cara Wilson
Margot Brereton
Bernd Ploderer
ABSTRACT
Existing co-design methods support verbal children on the autism spectrum in the design process, while their minimally-verbal peers are overlooked. We describe Co-Design Beyond Words (CDBW), an approach which merges existing co-design methods with practice-based methods from Speech and Language Therapy which are child-led and interests-based. These emphasise the rich detail that can be conveyed in the moment, through recognising occurrences of, for example, Joint Attention, Turn Taking and Imitation. We worked in an autism-specific primary school over 20 weeks with ten children, aged 5 to 8. We co-designed a playful prototype, the TangiBall, using the three iterative phases of CDBW; the Foundation Phase (preparation for interaction), the Interaction Phase (designing-and-reflecting in the moment) and the Reflection Phase (reflection-on-action). We contribute a novel co-design approach and present moments of interaction, the micro instances in design in which minimally-verbal children on the spectrum can convey meaning beyond words, through their actions, interactions, and attentional foci. These moments of interaction provide design insight, shape design direction, and reveal unique strengths, interests, and abilities.
- Meryl Alper. 2017. Giving voice: Mobile communication, disability, and inequality .MIT Press.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 5th ed. ed.). American Psychiatric Association Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
- Eevi Beck. 2002. P for Political - Participation is Not Enough. Scandinavian J. Inf. Systems, Vol. 14 (01 2002), 77--92. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol14/iss1/1Google Scholar
- Laura Benton and Hilary Johnson. 2014. Structured approaches to participatory design for children: can targeting the needs of children with autism provide benefits for a broader child population? Instructional Science, Vol. 42, 1 (01 Jan 2014), 47--65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laura Benton and Hilary Johnson. 2015. Widening participation in technology design: A review of the involvement of children with special educational needs and disabilities. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3--4 (2015), 23 -- 40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laura Benton, Asimina Vasalou, Rilla Khaled, Hilary Johnson, and Daniel Gooch. 2014. Diversity for Design: A Framework for Involving Neurodiverse Children in the Technology Design Process. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3747--3756. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Margot Brereton, Laurianne Sitbon, Muhammad Haziq Lim Abdullah, Mark Vanderberg, and Stewart Koplick. 2015. Design after design to bridge between people living with cognitive or sensory impairments, their friends and proxies. CoDesign, Vol. 11, 1 (2015), 4--20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott Andrew Brown, David Silvera-Tawil, Petra Gemeinboeck, and John McGhee. 2016. The Case for Conversation: A Design Research Framework for Participatory Feedback from Autistic Children. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 605--613. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John M Carroll and Mary Beth Rosson. 2007. Participatory design in community informatics. Design Studies, Vol. 28, 3 (2007), 243--261.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christian Dindler and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2007. Fictional Inquiry: design collaboration in a shared narrative space. CoDesign, Vol. 3, 4 (2007), 213--234. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952383.1952384Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jason C. Yip, Elizabeth Foss, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Mona Leigh Guha, Leyla Norooz, Emily Rhodes, Brenna McNally, Panagis Papadatos, Evan Golub, and Allison Druin. 2013. Children Initiating and Leading Cooperative Inquiry Sessions. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 293--296. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Co-Design Beyond Words: 'Moments of Interaction' with Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum
Recommendations
Self-Expression by Design: Co-Designing the ExpressiBall with Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsExpressing one's thoughts and feelings is a fundamental human need - the basis for communication and social interaction. We ask, how do minimally-verbal children on the autism spectrum express themselves? How can we better recognise instances of self-...
Co-designing with Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: From Ideation to Implementation
OzCHI '19: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-InteractionMost co-design-based Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) research is conducted with children and does not involve the participants directly. Studies have shown that people with ASD can take on the co-designer role in early phases of the software design ...
Co-Designing Digital Technologies to Support Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum
CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis doctoral work considers how to best co-design with minimally-verbal children on the autism spectrum in classroom contexts. It focuses on 1) leveraging personal interests and individual strengths to foster engagement, social interaction and self-...
Comments