skip to main content
research-article

Bridging the gap: automated steady scaffoldings for 3D printing

Published:27 July 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) is the process of 3D printing objects from melted plastic filament. The hot plastic exits a nozzle and fuses with the part just below, adding a layer of material to the object being formed. However, filament can only be deposited on top of an existing surface. Therefore, overhangs require a disposable support structure to be printed, temporarily supporting the threads of plastic that would otherwise hang in empty space.

Existing techniques for support generation fall into two categories: The first allow for very reliable prints by enclosing the bottom of the object in a dense structure, at the expense of increased material usage and build times. The second generate thin hierarchical structures connecting to the surface in a sparse number of points. This uses less material, at the expense of reliability: the part might become unstable, the structure itself may become difficult to print, the bottom surface quality degrades. The user therefore has to correct the structure and its parameters for each new object.

We propose to exploit the ability of FFF printers to print bridges across gaps. Since bridges are always supported by pillars at their extremities, they are both stronger and more stable than hierarchical tree structures. Our technique first selects the points to support based on overhang and part stability during the entire print process. It then optimizes for a printable scaffolding composed of bridges and vertical pillars, supporting all points. The result is an automated support generation technique using little material while ensuring fine surface quality and stability during the printing process.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a98-sidebyside.mp4

mp4

14.3 MB

References

  1. Alexander, P., Allen, S., and Dutta, D. 1998. Part orientation and build cost determination in layered manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design 30, 5, 343--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Allaire, G. 2006. Conception optimale de structures. Springer. ISBN 3-540-36710-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, S., and Dutta, D. 1995. Determination and evaluation of support structures in layered manufacturing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, J. W., Chen, T. P., Cohen, A. L., Smalley, D. R., Snead, D. E., and Vorgitch, T. J., 1988. Boolean layer comparison slice. US Patent 5854748, 3D Systems Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chalasani, K., Jones, L., and Roscoe, L. 1995. Support generation for fused deposition modeling. In Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 229--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, W., Fuh, J., Nee, A., Wong, Y., Loh, H., and Miyazawa, T. 1995. Multi-objective optimization of part- building orientation in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping Journal 1, 12--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Eggers, G., and Renap, K., 2007. Method and apparatus for automatic support generation for an object made by means of a rapid prototype production method. US Patent 20100228369, Materialize.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Frank, D., and Fadel, G. 1995. Expert system-based selection of the preferred direction of build for rapid prototyping processes. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 6, 5, 339--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Heide, E., 2011. Method for generating and building support structures with deposition-based digital manufacturing systems, 07. US Patent 20110178621 A1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang, X., Ye, C., Mo, J., and Liu, H. 2009. Slice data based support generation algorithm for fused deposition modeling. Tsinghua Science and Technology 14, S1, 223--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Huang, X., Ye, C., Wu, S., Guo, K., and Mo, J. 2009. Sloping wall structure support generation for fused deposition modeling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 42, 11--12, 1074--1081.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kritchman, E., Gothait, H., and Miller, G., 2008. System and method for printing and supporting three dimensional objects, 04. US Patent 7364686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Majhi, J., Janardan, R., Smid, M., and Gupta, P. 1999. On some geometric optimization problems in layered manufacturing. Computational Geometry 12, 34, 219--239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Prévost, R., Whiting, E., Lefebvre, S., and Sorkine-Hornung, O. 2013. Make It Stand: Balancing shapes for 3D fabrication. ACM Transactions on Graphics 32, 4, to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Smith, J., Hodgins, J. K., Oppenheim, I., and Witkin, A. 2002. Creating models of truss structures with optimization. ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Stava, O., Vanek, J., Benes, B., Carr, N. A., and Mech, R. 2012. Stress relief: improving structural strength of 3d printable objects. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 4, 48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Strano, G., Hao, L., Everson, R., and Evans, K. 2013. A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 66, 9--12, 1247--1254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wang, W., Wang, T. Y., Yang, Z., Liu, L., Tong, X., Tong, W., Deng, J., Chen, F., and Liu, X. 2013. Cost-effective printing of 3d objects with skin-frame structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics 32, 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bridging the gap: automated steady scaffoldings for 3D printing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
          ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 33, Issue 4
          July 2014
          1366 pages
          ISSN:0730-0301
          EISSN:1557-7368
          DOI:10.1145/2601097
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 July 2014
          Published in tog Volume 33, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader