skip to main content
10.1145/1240624.1240802acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Dynamic shared visual spaces: experimenting with automatic camera control in a remote repair task

Published:29 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an experimental study of automatic camera control in the performance of collaborative remote repair tasks using video-mediated communication. Twelve pairs of participants, one "helper" and one "worker," completed a series of Lego puzzle tasks using both a static camera and an automatic camera system that was guided in part by tracking the worker's hand position. Results show substantial performance benefits for the automatic system, particularly for complex tasks. The implications of these results are discussed, along with some lessons for the use of motion tracking as a driver for camera control.

References

  1. http://www.vicon.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballantyne, G.H. (2002). Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surgical Endoscopy, 16(10). 1389--1402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Beun, R.J. and Cremers, A.H.M. (1998). Object reference in a shared domain of conversation. Pragmatics and Cognition, 6(1). 111--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, H.H. (1992) Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Clark, H.H. and Brennan, S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication. in Resnick, L.B., Levine, R.M. and Teasley, S.D. eds. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 127--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale development: theory and applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Finholt, T.A. (2003). Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 12 (1). 5--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fussell, S.R., Kraut, R. and Siegel, J. (2000). Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. in ACM CSCW Conference, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fussell, S.R., Setlock, L.D. and Kraut, R.E. (2003). Effects of head-mounted and scene-oriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks. in ACM CHI Conference, 513--520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fussell, S.R., Setlock, L.D., Yang, J., Ou, J., Mauer, E. and Kramer, A.D.I. (2004). Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(3). 273--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gaver, W., Sellen, A., Heath, C. and Luff, P. (1993). One is not enough: multiple views in a media space. in ACM InterCHI Conference, 335--341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gergle, D. (2006). The value of shared visual information for task-oriented collaboration, Ph.D. Thesis, Human Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Inoue, T., Okada, K. and Matsushita, Y. (1995). Learning from TV programs: application of TV presentation to a videoconferencing system. in ACM UIST Symposium, 147--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Karsenty, L. (1999). Cooperative work and shared visual context: an empirical study of comprehension problems in side-by-side and remote help dialogues. Human-Computer Interaction, 14(3). 283--315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kirk, D. and Fraser, D.S. (2006). Comparing remote gesture technologies for supporting collaborative physical tasks. in ACM CHI Conference, 1191--1200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kouzes, R., Myers, J.D. and Wulf, W. (1996). Collaboratories: doing science on the internet. IEEE Computer, 29 (8). 40--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kraut, R. (2003) Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work. in Carroll, J.M. ed. HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks, Morgan Kaufmann, New York, 325--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kraut, R.E., Fussell, S.R. and Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(1/2). 13--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kuzuoka, H. (1992). Spatial workspace collaboration: a sharedview video support system for remote collaboration capability. in ACM CHI Conference, 533--540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nardi, B., Schwarz, H., Kuchinsky, A., Leichner, R., Whittaker, S. and Sclabassi, R. (1993). Turning away from talking heads: the use of video-as-data in neurosurgery. in ACM CHI Conference, 327--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nunally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. O'Malley, C., Langton, S., Anderson, A., Doherty-Sneddon, G. and Bruce, V. (1996). Comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated interaction. Interacting with Computers, 8(2). 177--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ou, J., Oh, L.M., Fussell, S.R., Blum, T. and Yang, J. (2005). Analyzing and predicting focus of attention in remote collaborative tasks. in ACM ICMI Conference, 116--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ou, J., Oh, L.M., Yang, J. and Fussell, S.R. (2005). Effects of task properties, partner actions, and message content on eye gaze patterns in a collaborative task. in ACM CHI Conference, 231--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Paulos, E. and Canny, J. (1998). PRoP: personal roving presence. in ACM CHI Conference, 296--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ranjan, A., Birnholtz, J.P. and Balakrishnan, R. (2006). An exploratory analysis of partner action and camera control in a video-mediated collaborative task. in ACM CSCW Conference, 403--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rui, Y., Gupta, A. and Grudin, J. (2003). Videography for telepresentations. in ACM CHI Conference, 457--464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Veinott, E., Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M. and Fu, X. (1999). Video helps remote work: speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. in ACM CHI Conference, 302--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Weick, K. (1998). Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21. 81--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic shared visual spaces: experimenting with automatic camera control in a remote repair task

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2007
        1654 pages
        ISBN:9781595935939
        DOI:10.1145/1240624

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 April 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate182of840submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader