Lee B. Erickson
ABSTRACT
In today's fact-paced global marketplace, many organizations are turning to the "crowd" as a potential new source of innovation. However, little is known about the strategic use of crowd and how best to integrate them into internal processes. This paper presents preliminary findings from an ongoing grounded theory research study designed to identify trends and patterns associated with crowdsourcing by established organizations. Four common uses of the crowd are identified (i.e., productivity, innovation, knowledge capture, and marketing/branding). Further, key reoccurring themes related to task type, crowd knowledge, crowd location, and organizational goals, challenges, and value extraction are identified. Finally, a discussion of the emerging relationships between organizational goal, tasks to be completed, crowd characteristics, and the potential risks and benefits such initiatives create for organizations is provided.
- Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Decision Management, 47(8), 1323--1399.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Barrington, L., Turnbull, D., O'Malley, & Lanckriet, G. (2009). User-centered design of a social game to tag music. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, 7--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bishop, M. (2009, May) The total economic impact of InnoCentive challenges. Single company case study. Forrester Consulting.Google Scholar
- Bonabeau, E. (2009, Winter). Decision 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 45--52.Google Scholar
- Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourced advertising: how we outperform Madison Avenue. Retrieved June 30, 2010 from http://bit.ly/HtP2ci.Google Scholar
- Byrant, A. & Charmaz, K. (2007). The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Chanal, V. & Caron-Fasan, M. L. (2008, May). How to invent a new business model based on crowdsourcing: The Crowdspirit case. Paper presented at the Conférence de l'Association Internationale de Management Stratégique, Nice.Google Scholar
- Chilton, S. (2009). Crowdsourcing is radically changing the geodata landscape: Case study of OpenStreetMap. Paper presented at the 24th International Cartographic Conference, Chile. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/H8PfTw.Google Scholar
- Christensen, J. F. (2006). Whither core competency for the large corporation in an open innovation world? In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, (35--61). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44--54.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Di Gangi, P. M., & Wasko, M. (2009). Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems, 48(1), 303--312. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532--550.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., & O'Reilly, P. (2009). Institutionalizing information asymmetry: Governance structures for open innovation. Information Technology & People, 22(4), 297--316.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fernández, W. D. (2004). The grounded theory method and case study data in IS research: issues and design. Information Systems Foundations Workshop: Constructing and Criticizing.Google Scholar
- Florida, R. (2007). The flight of the creative class. The new global competition for talent. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling Grounded Theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/607/1315#g33Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30(3), 611. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haklay, M., & Weber, P. (2008). OpenStreetMap: User-Generated Street Maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 12--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hogue, C. (2011). Crowdsourcing for science. Chemical & Engineering News, 89(27), 22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired, 14(6).Google Scholar
- Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York: Crown Business. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huston, L. & Sakkab, N. (2006, March). Connect and develop. Inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review. 49(4), 58--66.Google Scholar
- IBM Global Business Services. (2006). Expanding the Innovation Horizon. The Global CEO Study.Google Scholar
- Jeppesen, L. B., & Frederiksen, L. (2006). Why do Users Contribute to Firm-hosted User Communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science, 17(1), 45--63. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jouret, G. (2009). Inside Cisco's Search for the Next Big Idea. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 43.Google Scholar
- Ketchen, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Snow, C. C. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 371--383.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kleemann, F., Voß, G. G., & Rieder, K. (2008, July). Un(der)paid innovators: The commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 4(1) 5--26.Google Scholar
- Klein, H. K. & Meyers, M. D. (1999, March). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67--94. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lakhani, K. R., Jeppesen, L. B., Lohse, P. A., & Panetta, J. A. (2007, October). The value of openness in scientific problem solving. Harvard Business School Working Paper 07-050.Google Scholar
- Lakhani, K. R. & Panetta, J. A. (2007, Summer). The principles of distributed innovation. Innovations, 97--112.Google Scholar
- Lehmann, H. (2010). Grounded Theory and Information Systems: Are We Missing the Point? 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1--11). Presented at the 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meyers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 241--242. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Myers, M. D. (2009). Qualitative research in business & management. SAGE.Google Scholar
- Nambisan, S. & Sawhney, M. (2008). The global brain. Your roadmap for innovating faster and smarter in a networked world. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Connor, G. C. (2006). Open, radical innovation: Toward an integrated model in large established firms. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, (62--81). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 309--340. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reichwald, R., Seifert, S., Walcher, D., & Piller F. (2004, January). Customers as part of value webs: Towards a framework for webbed customer innovation tools. Proceedings from 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schau, H. J., Hemetsberger, A., & Kozinets, R. V. (2008). The Wisdom of Consumer Crowds. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), 339--354.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stern, P. N. (2007). On solid ground: Essential properties for growing grounded theory. In A. Byrant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, (pp. 114--126). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Stewart, O., Huerta, J., Sadder, M., Sakrajda, A., Marcotte. J., & Lubensky, D. (2009). Designing crowdsourcing community for the enterprise. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, 50--53. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trauth, E. M., & Erickson, L. B. (2012). Philosophical framing and its impact on research. In M. Maro, G. Gelman, & A. Steenkamp (Eds.). Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems (pp. 1--17). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
- Trauth, E. M., & Jessup, L. M. (2000). Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 43--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trompette, P., Chanal, V., & Pelissier, C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a way to access external knowledge for innovation: Control, incentive and coordination in hybrid forms of innovation. 24th EGOS Colloquium (pp. 1--29).Google Scholar
- Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2009). Putting the "theory" back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357--381.Google ScholarCross Ref
- U.S. Council on Competitiveness. (2008, October). Compete: New challenges, new answers. Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
- Walsham, G. (2003). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method (Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Wasko, M. M. & Teigland, R. (2004). Public goods or virtual commons? Applying theories of public goods, social dilemmas, and collective action to electronic networks of practice. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6(1), 25--41.Google Scholar
- West, J. & Gallagher, S. (2006). Patterns of open innovation in open source software. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, (82--106). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Whitla, P. (2009, March). Crowdsourcing and its application in marketing activities. Contemporary Management Research, 5(1), 15--28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wiggins, A. & Crowston, K. (2011). From conversation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. Kauai, Hawaii. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yin. R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Leveraging the crowd as a source of innovation: does crowdsourcing represent a new model for product and service innovation?
Recommendations
Organizational uses of the crowd: developing a framework for the study of crowdsourcing
SIGMIS-CPR '12: Proceedings of the 50th annual conference on Computers and People Research"Crowdsourcing" is commonly defined as the use of large groups of individuals by organizations to perform tasks traditionally performed by employees or designated agents. Currently, organizations are turning to the crowd to complete a wide variety of ...
Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation?
This study extends earlier empirical research into organizational decline which has found that substandard performance stimulates innovation in a wide range of manufacturing industries. Using data from 74 U.S. high technology firms, this research ...
Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation?
This study extends earlier empirical research into organizational decline which has found that substandard performance stimulates innovation in a wide range of manufacturing industries. Using data from 74 U.S. high technology firms, this research ...
Comments