skip to main content
10.1145/2228360.2228577acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved tangent space based distance metric for accurate lithographic hotspot classification

Published:03 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

A distance metric of patterns is crucial to hotspot cluster analysis and classification. In this paper, we propose an improved tangent space based metric for pattern matching based hotspot cluster analysis and classification. The proposed distance metric is an important extension of the well-developed tangent space method in computer vision. It can handle patterns containing multiple polygons, while the traditional tangent space method can only deal with patterns with a single polygon. It inherits most of the advantages of the traditional tangent space method, e.g., it is easy to compute and is tolerant with small variations or shifts of the shapes. Compared with the existing distance metric based on XOR of hotspot patterns, the improved tangent space based distance metric can achieve up to 37.5% accuracy improvement with at most 4.3x computational cost in the context of cluster analysis. The improved tangent space based distance metric is a more reliable and accurate metric for hotspot cluster analysis and classification. It is more suitable for industry applications.

References

  1. Chul-Hong Park, Yoo-Hyon Kim, Ji-Soong Park, Kwan-Do Kim, Moon-Hyun Yoo, and Jeong-Taek Kong. A systematic approach to correct critical patterns induced by the lithograhpy process at the full-chip level. In Proc. SPIE, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gerard T. Luk-Pat, Alexander Miloslavsky, Frank Tseng, and Linni Wen et. al. Correcting lithography hotspots during physical-design implementation. In Proc. SPIE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Li-Da Huang and Wong M. D. F. Optical proximity correction (OPC)-friendly maze routing. In DAC, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Mitra, P. Yu, and D. Z. Pan. RADAR: Ret-aware detailed routing using fast lithography simulations. In DAC, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Duo Ding and David Z. Pan. Machine learning based lithographic hotspot detection with critical feature extraction and classifications. In International conference on integrated circuit design technology, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Duo Ding, Andres J. Torres, Fedor G. Pikus, and David Z. Pan. High performance lithographic hotspot detection using hierarchically refined machine learning. In ASPDAC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Yao, S. Sinha, J. Xu, C. Chiang, Y. Cai, and X. Hong. Efficient range pattern matching algorithm for process-hotspot detection. In ICCAD, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ning Ma. Automatic IC Hotspot Classification and Detection using Pattern-Based Clustering. PhD thesis, Engineering ĺC Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniel P. Huttenlocher Klara Kedem and Joseph S. B. Mitchell Esther M. Arkin, L. Paul Chew. An efficiently computable metric for comparing polygonal shapes. (3):209--216, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Longin Jan Latecki and Rolf Lakamper. Shape similarity measure based on correspondence of visual parts. (10):1--6, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. C. Johnson. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, pages 241--254, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. L. Hubert and J. Schultz. Quadratic assignment as a general data-analysis strategy. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol, pages 190--241, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. W. Milligan. A monte carlo study of thirty internal criterion measures for cluster analysis. Psychometrika, (2):187--199, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Venkatesh Ganti, Raghu Ramakrishnan, and Johannes Gehrke. Clustering large datasets in arbitrary metric spaces. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 502--511, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improved tangent space based distance metric for accurate lithographic hotspot classification

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DAC '12: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Design Automation Conference
        June 2012
        1357 pages
        ISBN:9781450311991
        DOI:10.1145/2228360

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 June 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        DAC '24
        61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
        June 23 - 27, 2024
        San Francisco , CA , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader