skip to main content
10.1145/2414536.2414554acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Creating interactive physics education books with augmented reality

Published:26 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Augmented Books show three-dimensional animated educational content and provide a means for students to interact with this content in an engaging learning experience. In this paper we present a framework for creating educational Augmented Reality (AR) books that overlay virtual content over real book pages. The framework features support for certain types of user interaction, model and texture animations, and an enhanced marker design suitable for educational books. Three books teaching electromagnetism concepts were created with this framework. To evaluate the effectiveness in helping students learn, we conducted a small pilot study with ten secondary school students, studying electromagnetism concepts using the three books. Half of the group used the books with the diagrams augmented, while the other half used the books without augmentation. Participants completed a pre-test, a test after the learning session and a retention test administered 1 month later. Results suggest that AR has potential to be effective in teaching complex 3D concepts.

References

  1. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Billinghurst, M., & Düünser, A. (2012). Augmented Reality in the Classroom. IEEE Computer, 99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface. Computers & Graphics, 25(5), 745--753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Buchanan, P., Seichter, H., Billinghurst, M., & Grasset, R. (2008). Augmented reality and rigid body simulation for edutainment: the interesting mechanism - an AR puzzle to teach Newton physics. Paper presented at the Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chasteen, S., & Pollock, S. (2009). A Research-Based Approach to Assessing Student Learning Issues in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism, Ann Arbor (MI).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning. Science, 323 66--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dünser, A. (2005). Trainierbarkeit der Raumvorstellung mit Augmented Reality {Trainability of spatial ability with augmented reality} Unpublished Doctoral, Vienna, University of Vienna. Doctoral thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dünser, A. (2008). Supporting Low Ability Readers With Interactive Augmented Reality. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine: Changing the Face of Healthcare. Interactive Media Instistute (6), 41--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dünser, A., Grasset, R., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). A survey of evaluation techniques used in augmented reality studies. ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008....Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dünser, A., & Hornecker, E. (2007). An observational study of children interacting with an augmented story book. Paper presented at the Edutainment 2007, CUHK, Hong Kong. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dünser, A., Kaufmann, H., Steinbügl, K., & Glüück, J. (2006, 6.-7. July). Virtual and Augmented Reality as Spatial Ability Training Tools. Paper presented at the CHINZ 2006, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Grasset, R., Dünser, A., & Billinghurst, M. (2007). Human-Centered Development of an AR Handheld Display. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Grasset, R., Dünser, A., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). Design of a Mixed-Reality Book: Is It Still a Real Book? Paper presented at the ISMAR 2008, Cambridge, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hampshire, A., Seichter, H., Rapha\,\#235, Grasset, l., & Billinghurst, M. (2006). Augmented reality authoring: generic context from programmer to designer. Paper presented at the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kato, H., & Billinghurst, M. (1999). Marker tracking and hmd calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. Paper presented at the IWAR99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kaufmann, H., & Düünser, A. (2007). Summary of Usability Evaluations of an Augmented Reality Application for Geometry Education. Paper presented at the HCI International 2007, Bejing, China. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Liarokapis, F., Petridis, P., Lister, P., & White, M. (2002). Multimedia Augmented Reality Interface for E-Learning (MARIE). World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 1, 173--176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, T. Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515--527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. MacIntyre, B., Gandy, M., Dow, S., & Bolter, J. D. (2004). DART: a toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 97(1), 117--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instructional Science, 19, 177--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Rosenblum, L. (2000). Virtual and Augmented Reality 2020. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 20(1), 38--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Seichter, H., Looser, J., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). ComposAR: An intuitive tool for authoring AR applications. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Shelton, B. (2002). Augmented Reality and Education. New Horizons for learning. Retrieved from http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/technology/shelton.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Shelton, B., & Hedley, N. (2004). Exploring a Cognitive Basis for Learning Spatial Relationships with Augmented Reality. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1(4), 323--357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study. Review of Educational Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? New York: Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Vilkoniene, M. (2009). Influence of Augmented Reality Technology upon Pupils' Knowledge about Human Digestive System: The Results of the Experiment. US-China Education Review, 6(1), 36--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Creating interactive physics education books with augmented reality

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          OzCHI '12: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference
          November 2012
          692 pages

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 November 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader