skip to main content
10.1145/2658861.2658881acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can a social robot help children's understanding of science in classrooms?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study investigates whether a social robot which interacts with children via quiz-style conversations increases their understanding of science classes. We installed a social robot in an elementary school science classroom where children could freely interact with it during their breaks. The robot asks children questions related to their latest science classes to support their understanding of the classes. During interaction, the robot says children's name and distribute its gaze among the group of children by using a face recognition system and a human tracking system. Still, speech recognition is difficult in the noisy elementary school environment; therefore the operator takes over this function during interactions. In this study our result did not show significant effects of the robot for helping children's understanding, but we found several interesting interaction scenes which shows that robot had a certain effect on specific children.

References

  1. Chioccariello, A., Manca, S., and Sarti, L., 2001, Children's playful learning with a robotic construction kit, in Developing New Technologies for Young Children, S.-B. J. and J. Siraj-Blatchford eds., pp. 93--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hussain, S., Lindh, J., and Shukur, G., 2006, The effect of LEGO Training on Pupils' School Performance in Mathematics, Problem Solving Ability and Attitude: Swedish Data, Educational Technology & Society, vol. 9, pp. 182--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Han, J., Jo, M., Jones, V. and Jo, J. H., 2008. Comparative Study on the Educational Use of Home Robots for Children. Journal of Information Processing Systems. 4, 4, 159--0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., and Ishiguro, H., 2004, Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial, Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 19, pp. 61--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kanda, T., Shimada, M., and Koizumi, S., 2012, Children learning with a social robot, ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2012), Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yamazaki, A., Yamazaki, K., Kuno, Y., Burdelski, M., Kawahima, M., and Kuzuoka, H. 2008. Precision timing in human-robot interaction: coordination of head movement and utterance. In Proceeding of the 26th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pp.131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nagai, Y., K. Hosoda, A. Morita, and M. Asada 2003, A constructive model for the development of joint attention, Connection Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 211--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Arita A., Hiraki K., Kanda T., and Ishiguro H., 2005, Can we talk to robots? Ten-month-old infants expected interactive humanoid robots to be talked to by persons. Ccog nition, vol. 95, pp. B49-B57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shimada M. and, Yoshikawa Y., 2011, Effects of Observing Eye Contact between a Robot and Another Person, International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 143--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. B, Mutlu., T, Kanda., J, Forlizzi., J, HodGins., H, Ishiguro., Conversational Gaze Mechanisms for Humanlike Robots. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kirchner, N., Alempijevic, A., "A Robot Centric Perspective on HRI", Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 1, no. 2, pp.135--157, DOI 10.5898/JHRI1.2.Kirchner, 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., and Janse, M. D., 2010, Expressive Robots in Education: Varying the Degree of Social Supportive Behavior of a Robotic Tutor, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2010), pp. 1613--1622. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tanaka, F. and Matsuzoe, S., 2012, Children Teach a Care-Receiving Robot to Promote Their Learning: Field Experiments in a Classroom for Vocabulary Learning, Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 1, pp. 78--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bickmore, T. W. and Picard, R. W., 2005, Establishing and Maintaining Long-Term Human-Computer Relationships, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 12, pp. 293--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kidd, C. D., 2008, Designing for Long-Term Human-Robot Interaction and Application to Weight Loss, ed: Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kawai, H., Toda, T., Ni, J., Tsuzaki, M., and Tokuda, K., 2004, XIMERA: A new TTS from ATR based on corpus-based technologies, ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop, pp. 179--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. OKAO Vision, OMRON Corporation. http://www.omron.com/r_d/coretech/vision/okao.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. N, Dahlbäck., A, Jönsson., L, Ahrenberg., Wizard of Oz studies: why and how, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pp.193--200 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K, Dautenhahn., M, Walters., S, Woods., K, L, Koay., C, L, Nehaniv., A, Sisbot., R, Alami., T, Siméon., How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context., Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, pp.172--179 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M,L, Walters., K, Dautenhahn., R, Te Boekhorst., K, L, Koay., D, S, Syrdal., C, L, Nehaniv., An Empirical Framework for Human-Robot Proxemics., Procs of New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction symposium at the AISB09 convention, pp.144--149Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Brscic, DT. Kanda, T. Ikeda, and T. Miyashita, Person tracking in large public spaces using range sensors, IEEE Transaction on Human-Machine Systems, vol.43, pp.522--534, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. H. H. Clark, , "Using Language," Cambridge University Press, 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. E, T, Hall., The Hidden Dimension: Man's Use of Space in Public and Private. The Bodley Head Ltd, 1966Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Y, Hato., T, Kanold., K, Ishii., M, Imai., Showing Awareness of Humans' Context to Involve Humans in Interaction, IEEE RO-MAN 2009, pp.663--668Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Can a social robot help children's understanding of science in classrooms?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          HAI '14: Proceedings of the second international conference on Human-agent interaction
          October 2014
          412 pages
          ISBN:9781450330350
          DOI:10.1145/2658861

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 October 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          HAI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate27of62submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate121of404submissions,30%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader