skip to main content
10.1145/2857491.2857512acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bayesian identification of fixations, saccades, and smooth pursuits

Published:14 March 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smooth pursuit eye movements provide meaningful insights and information on subject's behavior and health and may, in particular situations, disturb the performance of typical fixation/saccade classification algorithms. Thus, an automatic and efficient algorithm to identify these eye movements is paramount for eye-tracking research involving dynamic stimuli. In this paper, we propose the Bayesian Decision Theory Identification (I-BDT) algorithm, a novel algorithm for ternary classification of eye movements that is able to reliably separate fixations, saccades, and smooth pursuits in an online fashion, even for low-resolution eye trackers. The proposed algorithm is evaluated on four datasets with distinct mixtures of eye movements, including fixations, saccades, as well as straight and circular smooth pursuits; data was collected with a sample rate of 30 Hz from six subjects, totaling 24 evaluation datasets. The algorithm exhibits high and consistent performance across all datasets and movements relative to a manual annotation by a domain expert (recall: μ = 91.42%, σ = 9.52%; precision: μ = 95.60%, σ = 5.29%; specificity μ = 95.41%, σ = 7.02%) and displays a significant improvement when compared to I-VDT, an state-of-the-art algorithm (recall: μ = 87.67%, σ = 14.73%; precision: μ = 89.57%, σ = 8.05%; specificity μ = 92.10%, σ = 11.21%). Algorithm implementation and annotated datasets are openly available at www.ti.uni-tuebingen.de/perception

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p163-santini.mp4

mp4

7.6 MB

References

  1. Ben-David, A. 2007. A lot of randomness is hiding in accuracy. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 20, 7, 875--885. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Berg, D. J., Boehnke, S. E., Marino, R. A., Munoz, D. P., and Itti, L. 2009. Free viewing of dynamic stimuli by humans and monkeys. Journal of Vision 9, 5, 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Braunagel, C., Kasneci, E., Stolzmann, W., and Rosenstiel, W. 2015. Driver-activity recognition in the context of conditionally autonomous driving. In IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fletcher, W. A., and Sharpe, J. A. 1988. Smooth pursuit dysfunction in alzheimer's disease. Neurology 38, 2, 272--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fuhl, W., Kübler, T., Sippel, K., Rosenstiel, W., and Kasneci, E. 2015. Excuse: Robust pupil detection in real-world scenarios. In Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns 2015. CAIP 2015. 16th International Conference, IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Galar, M., Fernández, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., and Herrera, F. 2011. An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: Experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes. Pattern Recognition 44, 8, 1761--1776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gyllensten, O. C. 2014. Evaluating current algorithms for smooth pursuit detection on Tobii Eye Trackers. Master's thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., and Van de Weijer, J. 2011. Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kasneci, E., Kasneci, G., Kübler, T., and Rosenstiel, W. 2015. Online recognition of fixations, saccades, and smooth pursuits for automated analysis of traffic hazard perception. In Artificial Neural Networks, P. Koprinkova-Hristova, V. Mladenov, and N. K. Kasabov, Eds., vol. 4 of Springer Series in Bio-/Neuroinformatics. Springer International Publishing, 411--434.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kasneci, E. 2013. Towards the automated recognition of assistance need for drivers with impaired visual field. PhD thesis, Universität Tübingen, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D., Ingling, A., Murray, R., and Broussard, C. 2007. Whats new in psychtoolbox-3. Perception 36, 14, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Knuth, D. E. 1992. Two notes on notation. American Mathematical Monthly, 403--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Komogortsev, O. V., and Karpov, A. 2013. Automated classification and scoring of smooth pursuit eye movements in the presence of fixations and saccades. Behavior research methods 45, 1, 203--215.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Komogortsev, O. V., and Khan, J. I. 2007. Kalman filtering in the design of eye-gaze-guided computer interfaces. In Human-Computer Interaction. HCI Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments. Springer, 679--689. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Komogortsev, O. V., Gobert, D. V., Jayarathna, S., Koh, D. H., and Gowda, S. M. 2010. Standardization of automated analyses of oculomotor fixation and saccadic behaviors. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 57, 11, 2635--2645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Larsson, L., Nystrom, M., and Stridh, M. 2013. Detection of saccades and postsaccadic oscillations in the presence of smooth pursuit. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 60, 9, 2484--2493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Larsson, L., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., and Stridh, M. 2015. Detection of fixations and smooth pursuit movements in high-speed eye-tracking data. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 18, 145--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Larsson, L. 2010. Event detection in eye-tracking data. Master's thesis, Lund University, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Leigh, R. J., and Zee, D. S. 2015. The neurology of eye movements. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lopez, J. S. A. 2009. Off-the-shelf Gaze Interaction. PhD thesis, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyer, C. H., Lasker, A. G., and Robinson, D. A. 1985. The upper limit of human smooth pursuit velocity. Vision Research 25, 4, 561--563.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. ODriscoll, G. A., and Callahan, B. L. 2008. Smooth pursuit in schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review of research since 1993. Brain and cognition 68, 3, 359--370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Salvucci, D. D., and Goldberg, J. H. 2000. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications, ACM, 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Santini, T., Fuhl, W., Kübler, T., and Kasneci, E. 2016. Eyerec: An open-source data acquisition software for head-mounted eye-tracking. In International Conference on Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP). Forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sauter, D., Martin, B., Di Renzo, N., and Vomscheid, C. 1991. Analysis of eye tracking movements using innovations generated by a kalman filter. Medical and biological Engineering and Computing 29, 1, 63--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Stampe, D. M. 1993. Heuristic filtering and reliable calibration methods for video-based pupil-tracking systems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25, 2, 137--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Tafaj, E., Kasneci, G., Rosenstiel, W., and Bogdan, M. 2012. Bayesian online clustering of eye movement data. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, ACM, New York, NY, USA, ETRA '12, 285--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Vidal, M., Bulling, A., and Gellersen, H. 2011. Analysing eog signal features for the discrimination of eye movements with wearable devices. In Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on pervasive eye tracking & mobile eye-based interaction, ACM, 15--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Vidal, M., Bulling, A., and Gellersen, H. 2012. Detection of smooth pursuits using eye movement shape features. In Proceedings of the symposium on eye tracking research and applications, ACM, 177--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Vidal, M., Bulling, A., and Gellersen, H. 2013. Pursuits: spontaneous interaction with displays based on smooth pursuit eye movement and moving targets. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing, ACM, 439--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bayesian identification of fixations, saccades, and smooth pursuits

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ETRA '16: Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications
            March 2016
            378 pages
            ISBN:9781450341257
            DOI:10.1145/2857491

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 14 March 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

            Upcoming Conference

            ETRA '24
            The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
            June 4 - 7, 2024
            Glasgow , United Kingdom

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader