skip to main content
10.1145/3343031.3350573acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Moment-to-Moment Detection of Internal Thought during Video Viewing from Eye Vergence Behavior

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Internal thought refers to the process of directing attention away from a primary visual task to internal cognitive processing. It is pervasive and closely related to primary task performance. As such, automatic detection of internal thought has significant potential for user modeling in human-computer interaction and multimedia applications. Despite the close link between the eyes and the human mind, only few studies have investigated vergence behavior during internal thought and none has studied moment-to-moment detection of internal thought from gaze. While prior studies relied on long-term data analysis and required a large number of gaze characteristics, we describe a novel method that is user-independent, computationally light-weight and only requires eye vergence information readily available from binocular eye trackers. We further propose a novel paradigm to obtain ground truth internal thought annotations by exploiting human blur perception. We evaluated our method during natural viewing of lecture videos and achieved a 12.1% improvement over the state of the art. These results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of vergence-based detection of internal thought and, as such, open new research directions for attention-aware interfaces.

References

  1. Benedek, M. et al. 2017. Eye Behavior Associated with Internally versus Externally Directed Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology. 8, June (Jun. 2017), 1--9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01092.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bixler, R. and D'Mello, S. 2016. Automatic gaze-based user-independent detection of mind wandering during computerized reading. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 26, 1 (Mar. 2016), 33--68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-015--9167--1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bulling, A. and Zander, T.O. 2014. Cognition-Aware Computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing. 13, 3 (Jul. 2014), 80--83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Casiez, G. et al. 2012. 1 filter: a simple speed-based low-pass filter for noisy input in interactive systems. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12 (New York, New York, USA, 2012), 2527.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Christoff, K. et al. 2016. Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 17, 11 (Nov. 2016), 718--731. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Conati, C. et al. 2013. Eye-Tracking for Student Modelling in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 227--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D'Mello, S.K. 2016. Giving Eyesight to the Blind: Towards Attention-Aware AIED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 26, 2 (Jun. 2016), 645--659. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0104-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dingler, T. 2016. Cognition-Aware systems as mobile personal assistants. UbiComp 2016 Adjunct - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. (2016), 1035--1040. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dixon, M.L. et al. 2014. A framework for understanding the relationship between externally and internally directed cognition. Neuropsychologia. 62, (Sep. 2014), 321--330. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Engbert, R. and Kliegl, R. 2003. Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research. 43, 9 (2003), 1035--1045. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Faber, M. et al. 2017. An automated behavioral measure of mind wandering during computerized reading. Behavior Research Methods. (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0857-y.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Feit, A.M. et al. 2017. Toward Everyday Gaze Input: Accuracy and Precision of Eye Tracking and Implications for Design. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17 (New York, New York, USA, 2017), 1118--1130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Franklin, M.S. et al. 2011. Catching the mind in flight: Using behavioral indices to detect mindless reading in real time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 18, 5 (2011), 992--997. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0109-6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Franklin, M.S. et al. 2013. Window to the wandering mind: Pupillometry of spontaneous thought while reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 66, 12 (Dec. 2013), 2289--2294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.858170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hansen, D.W. and Ji, Q. 2010. In the eye of the beholder: a survey of models for eyes and gaze. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. 32, 3 (2010), 478--500. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2009.30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. http://developer.tobii.com/:2018..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutt, S. et al. 2017. Gaze-based Detection of Mind Wandering during Lecture Viewing. 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutt, S. et al. 2016. The Eyes Have It: Gaze-based Detection of Mind Wandering during Learning with an Intelligent Tutoring System. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, International Educational Data Mining Society (2016), 86--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Killingsworth, M.A. and Gilbert, D.T. 2010. A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind. Science. 330, 6006 (Nov. 2010), 932--932. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kudo, S. et al. 2013. Input method using divergence eye movement. CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems on - CHI EA '13 (New York, New York, USA, 2013), 1335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Li, J. et al. 2016. Your Eye Tells How Well You Comprehend. IEEE 40th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) (2016), 503--508.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mijovic, P. et al. 2017. Towards continuous and real-time attention monitoring at work: reaction time versus brain response. Ergonomics. 60, 2 (Feb. 2017), 241--254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1142121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mills, C. et al. 2016. Automatic Gaze-Based Detection of Mind Wandering during Narrative Film Comprehension. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2016) (2016), 30--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Niehorster, D.C. et al. 2017. What to expect from your remote eye-tracker when participants are unrestrained. Behavior Research Methods. (Feb. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0863-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Olney, A.M. et al. 2015. Attention in Educational Contexts: The Role of the Learning Task in Guiding Attention. The Handbook of Attention. MIT Press. 623--642.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pham, P. and Wang, J. 2015. AttentiveLearner: Improving Mobile MOOC Learning via Implicit Heart Rate Tracking. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2015), 367--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Reichle, E.D. et al. 2010. Eye Movements During Mindless Reading. Psychological Science. 21, (2010), 1300--1310. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610378686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Salvucci, D.D. and Goldberg, J.H. 2000. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. Proceedings of the symposium on Eye tracking research & applications - ETRA '00 (New York, New York, USA, New York, USA, 2000), 71--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sattar, H. et al. 2017. Predicting the Category and Attributes of Visual Search Targets Using Deep Gaze Pooling. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) (Oct. 2017), 2740--2748.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sattar, H. et al. 2015. Prediction of search targets from fixations in open-world settings. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (Jun. 2015), 981--990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Schooler, J.W. et al. 2011. Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. (Jun. 2011). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Smallwood, J. et al. 2004. Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Consciousness and Cognition. 13, 4 (Dec. 2004), 657--690. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.06.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Smallwood, J. et al. 2004. The consequences of encoding information on the maintenance of internally generated images and thoughts: The role of meaning complexes. Consciousness and Cognition. 13, 4 (Dec. 2004), 789--820. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Smallwood, J. and Schooler, J.W. 2006. The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin. 132, 6 (2006), 946--958. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033--2909.132.6.946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Smallwood, J. and Schooler, J.W. 2015. The Science of Mind Wandering: Empirically Navigating the Stream of Consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology. 66, 1 (2015), 487--518. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Solé Puig, M. et al. 2013. A Role of Eye Vergence in Covert Attention. PLoS ONE. 8, 1 (Jan. 2013), e52955. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052955.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Solé Puig, M. et al. 2015. Attention-Related Eye Vergence Measured in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. PLOS ONE. 10, 12 (Dec. 2015), e0145281. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Steil, J. and Bulling, A. 2015. Discovery of everyday human activities from long-term visual behaviour using topic models. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp '15 (New York, New York, USA, 2015), 75--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Toates, F.M. 1974. Vergence eye movements. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 37, 1 (1974), 153--214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Unsworth, N. and Robison, M.K. 2016. Pupillary correlates of lapses of sustained attention. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. April (2016), 601--615. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0417-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Walcher, S. et al. 2017. Looking for ideas: Eye behavior during goal-directed internally focused cognition. Consciousness and Cognition. 53, (Aug. 2017), 165--175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson, A.B. and Ahumada, A.J. 2011. Blur clarified: A review and synthesis of blur discrimination. Journal of Vision. 11, 5 (Sep. 2011), 10--10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1167/11.5.10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Xiao, X. and Wang, J. 2017. Undertanding and Detecting Divided Attention in Mobile MOOC Learning. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. (2017), 2411--2415. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Moment-to-Moment Detection of Internal Thought during Video Viewing from Eye Vergence Behavior

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MM '19: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 2019
      2794 pages
      ISBN:9781450368896
      DOI:10.1145/3343031

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate252of936submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader