skip to main content
10.1145/3373165.3373181acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-ceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Barriers to Securing Industry Internships in Computing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 February 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Industry internships offer CS students an opportunity to explore computing disciplines, evaluate self-interests, understand professional expectations, and secure future employment. However, less than 60% of CS students pursue an internship before graduation. We have a limited knowledge of why students do not participate in industry internships and the impediments they face to secure an internship position. This paper presents findings from our multi-institutional study aimed at understanding the barriers CS students face to secure an industry internship. We discuss these barriers through the lens of agency from Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory and the Social Cognitive Career Theory. We surveyed 302 CS undergraduate students who did not intern across two universities in the United States and used thematic analysis on the open-ended survey responses. We found four themes: low self-efficacy, actions, alternate priority, and application process challenges. These themes suggest that CS students who do not intern self-evaluate them as not qualified, are applying but not securing an internship position due to lack of preparation or reliance on coursework, lack the knowledge pertinent to the internship recruitment process, and are not applying for internship positions due to alternate priorities or less developed agentic resources. This paper contributes to the fields' growing knowledge of CS students professional development. This knowledge has the potential to develop strategic support programs to increase students' competitiveness to secure internships as well as full-time employment.

References

  1. Albert Bandura. 1989. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am. Psychol. 44, 9 (1989), 1175--1184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Albert Bandura. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert Bandura. 2006. Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 2 (June 2006), 164--180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mahnaz Behroozi, Alison Lui, Ian Moore, Denae Ford, and Chris Parnin. 2018. Dazed: measuring the cognitive load of solving technical interview problems at the whiteboard. In 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Technologies Results (ICSE-NIER), 93--96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2019.8818836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mahnaz Behroozi, Chris Parnin, and Titus Barik. 2019. Hiring is Broken: What Do Developers Say About Technical Interviews? In IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Eric Brechner. 2003. Things they would not teach me of in college. In Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications - OOPSLA '03, 134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/949344.949387Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Steven D Brown and Robert W Lent. 1996. A social cognitive framework for career choice counseling. career Dev. Q. 44, 4 (1996), 354--366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Caleb Burns. 2017. Systematic analysis of industry engagement activities on student learning in the undergraduate technology program. Iowa State University, Digital Repository, Ames. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-4898Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandon Busteed and Zac Auter. Why Colleges Should Make Internships a Requirement. 2017. Retrieved August 31, 2019 from https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/222497/why-colleges-internships-requirement.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tracy Camp, Stuart Zweben, Jane Stout, and Duncan Buell. 2016. Booming enrollments. ACM Inroads 7, 2 (May 2016), 12--14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2915920Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gail Carmichael, Christine Jordan, Andrea Ross, and Alison Evans Adnani. 2018. Curriculum-Aligned Work-Integrated Learning: A New Kind of Industry-Academic Degree Partnership. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18), 586--591. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159543Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. John W. Creswell and J. David Creswell. 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Janet Davis and Samuel A Rebelsky. 2019. Developing Soft and Technical Skills Through Multi-Semester, Remotely Mentored, Community-Service Projects. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19), 29--35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287508Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Christopher Dean, Thomas D. Lynch, and Rajiv Ramnath. 2011. Student perspectives on learning through developing software for the real world. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2011.6142904Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sally Fincher and Daniel Knox. 2013. The Porous Classroom: Professional Practices in the Computing Curriculum. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif). 46, 9 (September 2013), 44--51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.261Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kathleen Freeman Hennessy, Jennifer Parham-Mocello, and Henry Walker. 2019. Co-Curricular Activities in Computer Science Departments. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19), 1248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3293735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Meg Fryling, MaryAnne Egan, Robin Y. Flatland, Scott Vandenberg, and Sharon Small. 2018. Catch 'em Early. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '18, 658--663. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. JN Gardner and G Van der Veer. 1998. The Senior Year Experience. Facilitating Integration, Reflection, Closure, and Transition. Retrieved August 31, 2018 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED412890Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Joann J. Ordille. Internships Enhance Student Research and Educational Experiences. Retrieved August 31, 2019 from https://cra.org/crn/2008/11/internships_enhance_student_research_and_ educational_experiences/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Amanpreet Kapoor. 2019. Deconstructing Successful and Unsuccessful Computer Science Undergraduate Interns. 1297--1297. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3293711Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2018. Understanding professional identities and goals of computer science undergraduate students. In SIGCSE 2018 - Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 191--196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159474Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2019. Understanding CS undergraduate students' professional development through the lens of internship experiences. In SIGCSE 2019 - Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 852--858. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287408Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2019. Understanding CS undergraduate students' professional identity through the lens of their professional development. In Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 9--15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319764Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2020. Exploring the Participation of CS Undergraduate Students in Industry Internships. In SIGCSE 2020 - Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366844Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Robert W Lent, Steven D Brown, and Gail Hackett. 1994. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. J. Vocat. Behav. 45, 1 (1994), 79--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Robert McCartney and Kate Sanders. 2015. School/Work: Development of Computing Students' Professional Identity at University. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research - ICER '15, 151--159. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2787622.2787732Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Gayle Laakmann McDowell. 2019. Cracking the coding interview: 189 programming questions and solutions. CareerCup. Retrieved August 31, 2019 from http://cds.cern.ch/record/2669252Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. John Mongan, Noah Suojanen Kindler, and Eric Giguère. 2012. Programming interviews exposed: secrets to landing your next job. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. National Association of Colleges and Employers. 2014. The Class of 2014 Student Survey Report. Bethlehem. Retrieved August 31, 2018 from www.naceweb.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT). Student Experience of the Major (SEM). Retrieved January 21, 2018 from https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/sem_survey_in_a_box_0.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Juan J Olarte, César Dominguez, Arturo Jaime, and Francisco J Garcia-Izquierdo. 2019. Impact of Part-Time CS Engineering Internships on Workload. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '19), 318. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3325554Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zachary J Oster. 2019. Improving Access to Internships with an On-Campus Software Development Center. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19), 1286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3293779Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rick Parker. 2018. Developing Software Engineers: A study of professionalization in a CS Senior Capstone. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '18, 276--276. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3162326Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Alex Radermacher and Gursimran Walia. 2013. Gaps between industry expectations and the abilities of graduates. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE '13, 525. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445351Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jim Schambach, Thomas P. Dirks. 2002. Student Perceptions of Internship Experiences. In International Academy for Information Management. Retrieved August 31, 2019 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED481733Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 2008. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Joo Tan and John Phillips. 2005. Incorporating Service Learning into Computer Science Courses. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 20, 4 (April 2005), 57--62. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1047846.1047854Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Gunjan Tomer and Sushanta Kumar Mishra. 2016. Professional identity construction among software engineering students. Inf. Technol. People 29, 1 (March 2016), 146--172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2013-0181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Tullio Vardanega and Monica Fedeli. 2018. A Two-staged Capstone Project to Foster University-business Dialogue. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2018), 272--277. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197130Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sarah Marie Zehr. 2016. Student Internship Experiences And Learning Opportunities: A Mixed Methods Study. Retrieved August 30, 2019 from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/158313587.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Software Developers. Retrieved January 20, 2018 from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/software-developers.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Computer Science is for Everyone! | whitehouse.gov. Retrieved January 21, 2018 from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2013/12/11/computer-science-everyoneGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. The Labor Market for Recent College Graduates. Retrieved August 31, 2018 from https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/college-labor-market/college-labor-market_compare-majors.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. The Positive Implications of Internships on Early Career Outcomes. Retrieved August 31, 2018 from http://www.naceweb.org/job-market/internships/the-positive-implications-of-internships-on-early-career-outcomes/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Employers Prefer Candidates With Work Experience. Retrieved August 31, 2018 from http://www.naceweb.org/talent-acquisition/candidate-selection/employers-prefer-candidates-with-work-experience/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Data Buddies - Center for Evaluating the Research Pipeline. Retrieved August 31, 2019 from https://cra.org/cerp/data-buddies/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. GitHub. Retrieved from https://github.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Barriers to Securing Industry Internships in Computing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ACE'20: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Australasian Computing Education Conference
        February 2020
        221 pages
        ISBN:9781450376860
        DOI:10.1145/3373165

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 February 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        ACE'20 Paper Acceptance Rate23of51submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate161of359submissions,45%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader