nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

12. Amputation of Mercury from Wastewater: Perspectives of Action Methods

verfasst von : Visakha Singh, Sunita Kar, M. Kiranmai Reddy, Y. Satyanarayana, B. Madhava Rao, Hippolyte Mutanyagwa

Erschienen in: Mercury Toxicity

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The indent of industrialization and its development has led to an increase in the levels of pollutants that are released into the environment. Most of these pollutants are toxic and highly dangerous, deteriorating the air, water, and land. One such dangerous and highly toxic pollutant is mercury, a heavy metal that can pollute water sources for a long time due to its persistence and bioaccumulation. The toxic effects of mercury have been well documented due to its impact on human health and ecosystem. Though mercury does exist in its natural form in the environment, its toxicity is negligible; due to the release of mercury contaminants from anthropogenic sources, the concentration of mercury toxicity in the environment has increased tremendously. One such anthropogenic source is wastewater, from which mercury gets released into the environment in high amounts. So, this chapter discusses the importance of effective treatment techniques for remediating mercury-contaminated wastewater by physical, biological, and chemical methods. The latest research on adsorption and filtration techniques have been discussed that could prove to be effective alternatives to conventional wastewater treatment practices. Synthesis and mechanisms of various types of biosorbents, nanosorbents, membrane filter techniques, and adsorbents have been described along with their potential future and challenges that need to be overcome to perform as an effective, efficient, and biocompatible wastewater treatment technique.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Application and Development Strategies of Nano-Adsorbents on Mercury Remediation

Nächstes Kapitel Environmental Mercury Toxicity and Its Bioremediation

Aliprandini P, Veiga MM, Marshall BG, Scarazzato T, Espinosa DC (2020) Investigation of mercury cyanide adsorption from synthetic wastewater aqueous solution on granular activated carbon. J Water Process Eng. 34:101154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101154CrossRef

Alvand M, Shemirani F (2017) A Fe₃O₄@SiO₂@ graphene quantum dot core-shell structured nanomaterial as a fluorescent probe and for magnetic removal of mercury(II) ion. Microchim Acta 184:1621–1629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2134-2CrossRef

Anagnostopoulos VA, Manariotis ID, Karapanagioti HK, Chrysikopoulos CV (2012) Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions by malt spent rootlets. Chem Eng J 213:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.074CrossRef

Anirudhan TS, Divya L, Ramachandran M (2008) Mercury(II) removal from aqueous solutions and wastewaters using a novel cation exchanger derived from coconut coir pith and its recovery. J Hazard Mater 157(2–3):620–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.030CrossRef

Artioli Y (2008) Adsorption. Encyclopedia of Ecology Fath. SEJD

Behjati M, Baghdadi M, Karbassi A (2018) Removal of mercury from contaminated saline wasters using dithiocarbamate functionalized-magnetic nanocomposite. J Environ Manage 213:66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.052CrossRef

Bernhoft RA (2012) Mercury toxicity and treatment: a review of the literature. J Environ Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/460508CrossRef

Bhatt R, Padmaj P (2019) A chitosan-thiomer polymer for highly efficacious adsorption of mercury. Carbohydr Polym 207:663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.018CrossRef

Bhowmick N, Dadhich AS, Prasuna RG, Reddy MK (2018) Screening and isolation of mercury tolerant bacteria from soil around the industrial areas of Visakhapatnam, India. Pollut Res 37:757–762

Broom GP, Squires RC, Simpson MPJ, Martin I (1994) The treatment of heavy metal effluents by crossflow microfiltration. J Membr Sci 87(1–2):219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0152-ACrossRef

Budihardjo MA, Wibowo YG, Ramadan BS, Serunting MA, Yohana E (2021) Mercury removal using modified activated carbon of peat soil and coal in simulated landfill leachate. Environ Technol Innov 24:102022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.102022CrossRef

Chen S, Wilson DB (1997) Construction and characterization of Escherichia coli genetically engineered for bioremediation of Hg (2+)-contaminated environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(6):2442–2445. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.6.2442-2445.1997CrossRef

Chen K, Zhang Z, Xia K, Zhou X, Guo Y, Huang T (2019) Facile synthesis of thiol-functionalized magnetic activated carbon and application for the removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solution. ACS Omega 4(5):8568–8579. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00572CrossRef

Chen Y, Yasin A, Zhang Y, Zan X, Liu Y, Zhang L (2020) Preparation and modification of biomass-based functional rubbers for removing mercury(II) from aqueous solution. Materials 13(3):632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030632CrossRef

Chien M, Nakahata R, Ono T, Miyauchi K, Endo G (2012) Mercury removal and recovery by immobilized Bacillus megaterium MB1. Front Chem Sci Eng 6:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-012-1284-3CrossRef

Chu EW, Karr JR (2017) Environmental impact: concept, consequences, measurement. Ref Module Life Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.02380-3CrossRef

Deng X, Wilson D (2001) Bioaccumulation of mercury from wastewater by genetically engineered Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:276–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100620CrossRef

Dou Z, Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Huang R (2023) Enhanced adsorption of gaseous mercury on activated carbon by a novel clean modification method. Sep Purif Technol 308:122885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122885CrossRef

Ebrahimpour E, Kazemi A (2023) Mercury(II) and lead(II) ions removal using a novel thiol-rich hydrogel adsorbent; PHPAm/Fe₃O₄@SiO₂-SH polymer nanocomposite. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:13605–13623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23055-zCrossRef

Egirani D, Latif MT, Wessey N, Poyi NR, Shehata N (2021) Preparation and characterization of powdered and granular activated carbon from Palmae biomass for mercury removal. Appl Water Sci 11:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01343-8CrossRef

Emenike EC, Adeniyi AG, Iwuozor KO, Okorie CJ, Egbemhenghe AU, Omuku PE, Okwu KC, Saliu OD (2023) A critical review on the removal of mercury (Hg²⁺) from aqueous solution using nanoadsorbents. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manage 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2023.100816

Fabre E, Lopes CB, Vale C, Pereira E, Silva CM (2020) Valuation of banana peels as an effective biosorbent for mercury removal under low environmental concentrations. Sci Total Environ 709:135883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135883CrossRef

Fabre E, Vale C, Pereira E, Silva CM (2021) Sustainable water treatment: use of agricultural and industrial wastes to remove mercury by biosorption. Water Air Soil Pollut 232:284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05165-5CrossRef

Fathollahi A, Coupe SJ, El-Sheikh AH, Sañudo-Fontaneda LA (2020) The biosorption of mercury by permeable pavement biofilms in stormwater attenuation. Sci Total Environ 741:140411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140411CrossRef

Fazal S, Zhang B, Mehmood Q (2015) Biological treatment of combined industrial wastewater. Ecol Eng 84:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.014CrossRef

Gao P, Lei J, Tan J, Wang G, Liu H, Zhou L (2021) Self-assembled magnetic microcrystalline cellulose/MoS₂/Fe₃O₄ composite for efficient adsorptive removal of mercury ions (Hg²⁺). Compos Commun 25:100736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2021.100736CrossRef

Ghaedi M (ed) (2021) Adsorption: fundamental processes and applications. Academic Press

Ghodbane I, Hamdaoui O (2008) Removal of mercury(II) from aqueous media using eucalyptus bark: kinetic and equilibrium studies. J Hazard Mater 160(2–3):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.116CrossRef

Ghosh S, Othmani A, Malloum A, Christ OK, Onyeaka H, AlKafaas SS, Nnaji ND, Bornman C, Al-Sharify ZT, Ahmadi S, Dehghani MH (2022) Removal of mercury from industrial effluents by adsorption and advanced oxidation processes: A comprehensive review. J Mol Liq 120491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120491

Green-Ruiz C (2006) Mercury(II) removal from aqueous solutions by nonviable Bacillus sp. from a tropical estuary. Bioresour Technol 97(15):1907–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.08.014

Grimwood K (2013) Thermal degradation. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. Academic Press

Henneberry YK, Kraus TE, Fleck JA, Krabbenhoft DP, Bachand PM, Horwath WR (2011) Removal of inorganic mercury and methylmercury from surface waters following coagulation of dissolved organic matter with metal-based salts. Sci Total Environ 409(3):631–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.10.030CrossRef

Hsu-Kim H, Eckley CS, Achá D, Feng X, Gilmour CC, Jonsson S, Mitchell CP (2018) Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes. Ambio 47:141–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1006-7CrossRef

Huang Y, Du JR, Zhang Y, Lawless D, Feng X (2015) Removal of mercury(II) from wastewater by polyvinylamine-enhanced ultrafiltration. Sep Purif Technol 154:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.003CrossRef

Hussain CM, Paulraj MS, Nuzhat S (2022) Source reduction, waste minimization, and cleaner technologies. Source Reduction Waste Minimization 23–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824320-6.00002-2

Inglezakis VJ, Kurbanova A, Molkenova A, Zorpas AA, Atabaev TS (2020) Magnetic Fe₃O₄-Ag⁰ nanocomposites for effective mercury removal from water. Sustainability 12(13):5489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135489CrossRef

Islam MS, Vogler RJ, Abdullah Al Hasnine SM, Hernández S, Malekzadeh N, Hoelen TP, Hatakeyama ES, Bhattacharyya D (2020) Mercury removal from wastewater using cysteamine functionalized membranes. ACS Omega 5(35):22255–22267. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c02526

Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN (2014) Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol 7(2):60–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-0009

Johnson C (2014) Advances in pretreatment and clarification technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382182-9.00029-3

Khan A, Ali J, Jamil SUU, Zahra N, Tayaba TB, Iqbal MJ, Waseem H (2022) Removal of micropollutants. In: Environmental micropollutants. Elsevier, pp 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90555-8.00012-X

Khozemy EE, Nasef SM, Mohamed TM (2020) Radiation synthesis of superabsorbent hydrogel (wheat flour/acrylamide) for removal of mercury and lead ions from waste solutions. J Inorg Organomet Polym 30:1669–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-019-01350-6CrossRef

Kim SJ, Chung JH, Kim TY, Cho SY (2006) Biosorption of heavy metals and cyanide complexes on biomass. Stud Surf Sci Catal 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(06)81553-3

Kjellstrom T, Lodh M, McMichael T, Ranmuthugala G, Shrestha R, Kingsland S (2006) Air and water pollution: burden and strategies for control. Disease control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edn

Kumar R, Rauwel P, Rauwel E (2021) Nanoadsorbants for the removal of heavy metals from contaminated water: current scenario and future directions. Processes 9(8):1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081379CrossRef

Lei X, Li H, Luo Y, Sun X, Guo X, Hu Y, Wen R (2021) Novel fluorescent nanocellulose hydrogel based on gold nanoclusters for the effective adsorption and sensitive detection of mercury ions. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 123:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.05.044CrossRef

Li N, Bai R, Liu C (2005) Enhanced and selective adsorption of mercury ions on chitosan beads grafted with polyacrylamide via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. Langmuir 21(25):11780–11787. https://doi.org/10.1021/la051551bCrossRef

Li SX, Feng-Ying Z, Yang H, Jian-Cong N (2011) Thorough removal of inorganic and organic mercury from aqueous solutions by adsorption on Lemna minor powder. J Hazard Mater 186(1):423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.009CrossRef

Li Y, Yang L, Li X, Miki T, Nagasaka T (2021) A composite adsorbent of ZnS nanoclusters grown in zeolite NaA synthesized from fly ash with a high mercury ion removal efficiency in solution. J Hazard Mater 411:125044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125044CrossRef

Liu C, Farooq K, Doll B, Venkatadri R (2013) Economical and reliable mercury reduction in refinery and power plant discharge wastewater with robust microfiltration membrane technology. Desalin Water Treat 51(25–27):4980–4986. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.809641CrossRef

Lu X, Huangfu X, Ma J (2014) Removal of trace mercury(II) from aqueous solution by in situ formed Mn–Fe (hydr) oxides. J Hazard Mater 280:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.056CrossRef

Lu J, Wu X, Li Y, Liang Y, Cui W (2019) Facile fabrication of 3D graphene–silica hydrogel composite for enhanced removal of mercury ions. Nanomater 9(3):314. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030314CrossRef

Luo Q, Huang Y, Lei Z, Peng J, Xu D, Guo X, Wu Y (2021) Wood-derived nanocellulose hydrogel incorporating gold nanoclusters using in situ multistep reactions for efficient sorption and sensitive detection of mercury ion. Ind Crops Prod 173:114142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114142CrossRef

Makertihartha IGB, Rizki Z, Zunita M, Dharmawijaya PT (2017) Graphene based nanofiltration for mercury removal from aqueous solutions. Adv Sci Lett 23(6):5684–5686. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.8802CrossRef

Marimón-Bolívar W, Tejeda-Benítez L, Herrera AP (2018) Removal of mercury(II) from water using magnetic nanoparticles coated with amino organic ligands and yam peel biomass. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manage 10:486–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2018.10.001

Min X, Qing C, Jinjin C (2010) Study on the treatment of wastewater containing mercury by macromolecular heavy metal flocculant mercaptoacetyl polyethyleneimine. Water Environ Res 82(9):790–796. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143010X12609736966766CrossRef

Mistar EM, Hasmita I, Alfatah T, Muslim A, Supardan MD (2019) Adsorption of mercury(II) using activated carbon produced from Bambusa vulgaris var. striata in a fixed-bed column. Sains Malaysiana 48(4):719–725. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2019-4804-03

Mochizuki Y, Bud J, Liu J, Takahashi M, Tsubouchi N (2021) Mercury(II) ion adsorption performance of Cl-loaded carbonaceous material prepared by chlorination of pyrolyzed rice husk char. J Cleaner Prod 305:127176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127176CrossRef

Monteagudo JM, Ortiz MJ (2000) Removal of inorganic mercury from mine waste water by ion exchange. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 75:767–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4660(200009)75:9CrossRef

Nayak MC, Isloor AM, Lakshmi B, Marwani HM, Khan I (2020) Polyphenylsulfone/multiwalled carbon nanotubes mixed ultrafiltration membranes: fabrication, characterization and removal of heavy metals Pb²⁺, Hg²⁺, and Cd²⁺ from aqueous solutions. Arab J Chem 13(3):4661–4672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2019.10.007CrossRef

Nille OS, Patil AS, Waghmare RD, Naik VM, Gunjal DB, Kolekar GB, Gore AH (2021) Valorization of tea waste for multifaceted applications: a step toward green and sustainable development. In: Valorization of agri-food wastes and by-products. Academic Press, pp 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824044-1.00046-5

Oehmen A, Vergel D, Fradinho J, Reis MA, Crespo JG, Velizarov S (2014) Mercury removal from water streams through the ion exchange membrane bioreactor concept. J Hazard Mater 264:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.067CrossRef

Pagala B (2023) Characteristic evaluation of tamarind flower biomass for mercury biosorption: statistical approach. Biomass Conv Bioref https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03769-x

Park D, Woo SH, Yun YS, Ahn CK (1983) Jong Moon Park. Education, 1986

Peppas NA, Slaughter BV, Kanzelberger MA, Matyjaszewski K, Möller M (2012) 9.20–hydrogels. Polym Sci A Compr Ref 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53349-4.00226-0

Qasem NA, Mohammed RH, Lawal DU (2021) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review. Npj Clean Water 4(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-021-00127-0CrossRef

Rahbar N, Jahangiri A, Boumi S, Khodayar MJ (2014) Mercury removal from aqueous solutions with chitosan-coated magnetite nanoparticles optimised using the box-behnken design. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-15913

Roberts HW, Marek M, Kuehne JC, Ragain JC (2005) Disinfectants’ effect on mercury release from amalgam. J Am Dental Assoc 136(7):915–919. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0292

Saberi A, Sadeghi M, Alipour E (2020) Design of AgNPs-base starch/PEG-poly (acrylic acid) hydrogel for removal of mercury(II). J Polym Environ 28:906–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01651-9CrossRef

Say R, Birlik E, Erdemgil Z, Denizli A, Ersöz A (2008) Removal of mercury species with dithiocarbamate-anchored polymer/organosmectite composites. J Hazard Mater 150(3):560–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.03.089CrossRef

Shirzadi H, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A (2017) An efficient modified zeolite for simultaneous removal of Pb(II) and Hg(II) from aqueous solution. J Mol Liq 230:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.01.029CrossRef

Shmeis RMA (2022) Nanotechnology in wastewater treatment. In: Comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol 99. Elsevier, pp 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.coac.2021.11.002

Siddiqui SI, Chaudhry SA (2017) Iron oxide and its modified forms as an adsorbent for arsenic removal: a comprehensive recent advancement. Process Saf Environ Prot 111:592–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.009CrossRef

Soni R, Bhardwaj S, Shukla DP (2020) Various water-treatment technologies for inorganic contaminants: current status and future aspects. Inorg Pollut Water 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818965-8.00014-7

Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ (2012) Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Exp Suppl 101:133–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6CrossRef

Templeton MR, Butler D (2011) Introduction to wastewater treatment. Bookboon

Tuzen M, Sarı A, Mogaddam MRA, Kaya S, Katin KP, Altunay N (2022) Synthesis of carbon modified with polymer of diethylenetriamine and trimesoyl chloride for the dual removal of Hg(II) and methyl mercury ([CH₃Hg]⁺) from wastewater: theoretical and experimental analyses. Mater Chem Phys 277:125501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125501CrossRef

Valezi DF, Vicentin BLS, Mantovani ACG, Di Mauro E (2019) Applications of electron magnetic resonance in the study of soils, minerals, and iron oxides. In: Experimental methods in the physical sciences, vol 50. Academic Press, pp 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814024-6.00010-8

Vedrenne M, Vasquez-Medrano R, Prato-Garcia D, Frontana-Uribe BA, Ibanez JG (2012) Characterization and detoxification of a mature landfill leachate using a combined coagulation–flocculation/photo Fenton treatment. J Hazard Mater 205:208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.060CrossRef

Vélez E, Campillo GE, Morales G, Hincapié C, Osorio J, Arnache O, Uribe JI, Jaramillo F (2016) Mercury removal in wastewater by iron oxide nanoparticles. In: Journal of physics: conference series, vol 687. IOP Publishing, p 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/687/1/012050

Vishwakarma V (2021) Recovery and recycle of wastewater contaminated with heavy metals using adsorbents incorporated from waste resources and nanomaterials: a review. Chemosphere 273:129677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129677CrossRef

Voloshina E (2017) Hematite, its stable surface terminations and their reactivity toward water. In: Reference module in chemistry, molecular sciences and chemical engineering. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.14157-5

Wang J, Hong Y, Lin Z, Zhu C, Da J, Chen G, Jiang F (2019) A novel biological sulfur reduction process for mercury-contaminated wastewater treatment. Water Res 160:288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.066CrossRef

Wang Q, Zhu S, Xi C, Jiang B, Zhang F (2022) Adsorption and removal of mercury(II) by a crosslinked hyperbranched polymer modified via sulfhydryl. ACS Omega 7(14):12231–12241. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00622CrossRef

Wang LK, Vaccari DA, Li Y, Shammas NK (2005) Chemical precipitation. Physicochem Treatment Process 141–197. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-820-x:141

Wu CY, Mouri H, Chen SS, Zhang DZ, Koga M, Kobayashi J (2016) Removal of trace-amount mercury from wastewater by forward osmosis. J Water Process Eng 14:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.10.010CrossRef

Yang J, Hou B, Wang J, Tian B, Bi J, Wang N, Li X, Huang X (2019) Nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Nanomater 9(3):424. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030424CrossRef

Yaqub M, Lee SH (2020) Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) of mercury-contaminated wastewater: experimental and artificial neural network modeling. J Water Process Eng 33:101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101046CrossRef

Zabihi M, Omidvar M, Motavalizadehkakhky A, Zhiani R (2022) Competitive adsorption of arsenic and mercury on nano-magnetic activated carbons derived from hazelnut shell. Korean J Chem Eng 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-0903-4

Zeng B, Li J, Xiong C, Lin G, Wang W, Wu Z (2022) High-performance Zn-based coordination polymers selectively adsorb mercury ions from aqueous solutions. J Cleaner Prod 337:130551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130551CrossRef

Zhang S, Li H, Wang Z, Liu J, Zhang H, Wang B, Yang Z (2015) A strongly coupled Au/Fe₃O₄/GO hybrid material with enhanced nanozyme activity for highly sensitive colorimetric detection, and rapid and efficient removal of Hg²⁺ in aqueous solutions. Nanoscale 7(18):8495–8502. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR00527BCrossRef

Zhang B, Petcher S, Gao H, Yan P, Cai D, Fleming G, Parker DJ, Chong SY, Hasell T (2021) Magnetic sulfur-doped carbons for mercury adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 603:728–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.06.129CrossRef

Zinchenko AA, Sakai H, Matsuoka S, Murata S (2009) Application of DNA condensation for removal of mercury ions from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 168(1):38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.121CrossRef

Zunita M (2021) Graphene oxide-based nanofiltration for Hg removal from wastewater: a mini review. Membr 11(4):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11040269CrossRef

Titel: Amputation of Mercury from Wastewater: Perspectives of Action Methods
verfasst von: Visakha Singh
Sunita Kar
M. Kiranmai Reddy
Y. Satyanarayana
B. Madhava Rao
Hippolyte Mutanyagwa
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Buch: Mercury Toxicity
Print ISBN: 978-981-9977-18-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-9977-19-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7719-2_12