nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

14. Biosorption of Mercury from Aqueous Solutions by Biosorbents

verfasst von : Ismael Acosta, Adriana Rodríguez, Juan Fernando Cárdenas, Víctor Manuel Martínez

Erschienen in: Mercury Toxicity

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The main source of contamination to the environment by mercury occurs when it is discharged into the water or soil by industries, and it can be converted by microorganisms present in the environment into a more toxic organic compound, which is rapidly absorbed by different aquatic organisms, and through the food chain, it can accumulate in different living beings and environments. The heavy metal mercury compounds can be harmful for living organisms, accumulating in the kidneys and brain, causing damage to the nervous system. Because it accumulates in the body, high levels of exposure to this metal cause severe health problems. Here, we analyzed the biosorption of mercury by ten fungal biomasses isolated from a place with a high flow of heavy-duty vehicles. The fungal biomasses more efficient in the removal of the metal were: Purpureocillium lilacinum, Mucor sp., Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium sp., and Aspergillus terreus, with removal percentages of 100%, 100%, 100%, 97%, and 93%, respectively, at a pH of 5.5, 28 °C, and 24 h of incubation, and under the analyzed conditions. The use of different natural biomasses can be a great alternative to try to eliminate the different pollutants produced by different human and industrial activities. Too, we studied the optimal conditions of removal of this metal by P. lilacinum.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Environmental Mercury Toxicity and Its Bioremediation

Acosta-Rodríguez I, Cárdenas-González JF, Rodríguez-Pérez AS, Tovar-Oviedo J, Martínez-Juárez VM (2018) Bioremoval of different heavy metals by the resistant fungal strain Aspergillus niger. Bioinorg Chem Appl 3457196:7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3457196

Acosta-Rodríguez I, Pacheco-Castillo NC, Cárdenas-González JF, Moctezuma-Zarate MG, Martínez-Juárez VM, Rodríguez-Pérez A (2018) Bioadsorción de mercurio(II) en solución acuosa por la biomasa de Aspergillus niger. Mexican J Biotechnol 3(3):15–25. https://doi.org/10.29267/mxjb.2018.3.3.15

Alzahrani NH, El-Gendy MMAA (2019) Torerance and removal of Zinc(II) and mercury(II) by dead biomass of Aspergillus tubingensis MERV4. J Indus Pollut Control 35(1):2251–2257. www.icontrolpollution.com

Anuar SNIS, Othman F, Chay TC, Nasir NAHA (2020) Biosorption of mercury ion (Hg²⁺) using live and dead cells of Rhizopus oryzae and Aspergillus niger: characterization, kinetic and isotherm studies. J Pure Appl Microbiol 14(3):1749–1760. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.14.3.13

Ayele A, Haile S, Alemu D, Kamaraj (2021) Comparative utilization of dead and live fungal biomass for the removal of heavy metal: a concise review. Hindawi Sci World J 5588111:10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5588111

Bashardoost R, Vahabzadeh F, Shokrollahzadeh S, Monazzami AR (2020) Sorption performance of live and heat-inactivated loofa-immobilized Phanerochaete chrysosporium in mercury removal from aqueous solution. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 29(4):79–89. https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2010.6408CrossRef

Bayramo G, Arıca MY (2008) Removal of heavy mercury(II), cadmium(II) and zinc(II) metal ions by live and heat inactivated Lentinus edodes pellets. Chem Eng J 143(2008):133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.01.002CrossRef

Bell L, DiGangi J, Weinberg J (2014) Introducción a la contaminación por mercurio y al convenio de Minamata sobre mercurio para las ONG. Red Internacional de Eliminación de los Contaminantes Orgánicos Persistentes (IPEN). Un futuro sin tóxicos. 1ª. Ed. http://ipen.org/sites/default/files/documents/ipen-booklet-hg-update-v1_6a-es-web.pdf

Camacho de la Cruz AA, Espinosa-Reyes G, Rebolloso-Hernández CA, Carrizales-Yáñez L, Ilizaliturri-Hernández CA, Reyes-Arreguín LE, Díaz-Barriga F (2021) Holistic health risk assessment in an artisanal mercury mining region in Mexico. Environ Monit Assess 193(541):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09312-7CrossRef

Cárdenas González JF, Acosta Rodríguez I, Terán Figueroa Y, Lappe Oliveras P, Martínez Flores R, Rodríguez Pérez AS (2021) Biotransformation of chromium(VI) via a reductant activity from the fungal strain Purpureocillium lilacinum. J Fungi 7(1022):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7121022

Chang J, Duan Y, Dong J, Shen S, Si G, He F, Yang Q, Chen J (2019) Bioremediation of Hg-contaminated soil by combining a novel Hg-volatilizing Lecythophora sp. fungus, DC-F1, with biochar: performance and the response of soil fungal community. Sci Total Environ 67:676–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.409CrossRef

Chen L, Zhang X, Zhang M, Zhu Y, Zhuo R (2022) Removal of heavy-metal pollutants by white rot fungi: mechanisms, achievements, and perspectives. J Clean Prod 354:131681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131681CrossRef

Das SK, Das AR, Guha AK (2007) A study on the adsorption mechanism of mercury on Aspergillus versicolor biomass. Environ Sci Technol 41:8281–8287. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070814gCrossRef

Díaz de León-Martínez L, Ortega-Romero M, Gavilán-García A, Barbier OC, Carrizalez Yáñez L, Van-Brusel E, Díaz-Barriga F, Flores-Ramírez R (2021) Assessment of biomarkers of early kidney damage and exposure to pollutants in artisanal mercury mining workers from Mexico. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:13333–13343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16628-xCrossRef

El-Bondkly AMA, El-Gendy MMAA (2022) Bioremoval of some heavy metals from aqueous solutions by two different indigenous fungi Aspergillus sp. AHM69 and Penicillium sp. AHM96 isolated from petroleum refining wastewater. Heliyon 8(7):e09854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09854

Gazzola J (2022) Cinabrio y mercurio en Teotihuacán y, en particular, en el túnel bajo el templo de la Serpiente Emplumada, México. Journal de la Société des américanistes [En línea]. 108(1):83–115. http://journals.openedition.org/jsa/20694. https://doi.org/10.4000/jsa.20694

Ghaffar I, Hussain A, Javid A, Mehmood S (2023) Impeding effect of polystyrene microplastic pollutants on Hg²⁺ uptake potential of Aspergillus flavus. Pakistan J Zool 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20230130070108

Greenberg AE, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18ª. ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., pp 3–83, 3–107, 1–49, 1–50

Gupta R, Ahuja P, Khan S, Saxena RK, Mohapatra H (2020) Microbial biosorbents: meeting challenges of heavy metal pollution in aqueous solutions. Curr Sci 78(8):967–973. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24103732

Hernández-Flores JL, Melo JGB, Hernández AC, López MAR, Gutiérrez CS, Gomez SR, Moreno VP, Medina RPC, Soto JHV, Hernández SP, Jones GH, Flores SC, Campos-Guillen J (2018) Isolation and characterization of mercury resistant Trichoderma Strains from soil with high levels of mercury and its effects on Arabidopsis thaliana mercury uptake. Adv Microbiol 2018(8):600–613. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2018.87040CrossRef

Hindersah R, Asda KR, Herdiyantoro D, Kamaluddin NN (2018) Isolation of mercury-resistant fungi from mercury-contaminated agricultural soil. Agriculture 8(33):1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8030033CrossRef

Kapahi M, Sachdeva S (2019) Bioremediation options for heavy metal pollution. J Health Pollut 9(24):1–20. https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-9.24.191203CrossRef

Lee K, Buckley L, Campbell CC (1975) An aminoacid liquid synthetic medium for the development of mycelial and yeast forms of Candida albicans. Sabouradia 13(2):148–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00362177585190271CrossRef

Li X, Zhang D, Sheng F, Qing H (2018) Adsorption characteristics of Copper(II), Zinc(II) and Mercury(II) by four kinds of immobilized fungi residues. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 147(2018):357–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.058CrossRef

Lindig-Cisneros R, Gómez-Orozco SY (2021) Arsénico y mercurio en el paisaje de una zona minera histórica en el oriente de Michoacán, Mexico. Tecnología y Ciencias Del Agua 12(6):480–501. https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2021-06-12CrossRef

López Martínez R, Méndez Tovar LJ, Hernández Hernández F, Castañón Olivares R (2004) Micología Médica. Procedimientos para el Diagnóstico de Laboratorio. Ed. Trillas. México. 2ª. Ed

Loza del Carpio AL, Ccancapa Salcedo Y (2020) Mercurio en arroyo altonadino con alto impacto por minería aurifera artisanal, La Rinconada, Puno, Peru. Revista Internacional De Contaminación Ambiental 36(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2020.36.53317CrossRef

Martínez-Juárez VM, Cárdenas-González JF, Torre Bouscoulet ME, Acosta-Rodríguez I (2012) Biosorption of mercury(II) from aqueous solutions onto fungal biomass. Bioinorg Chem Appl 5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/156190

Mi Y, Bai X, Li X, Zhou M, Liu X, Wang F, Su H, Chen H, Wei Y (2023) Soil mercury pollution changes soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community composition. J Fungi 9(395):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040395

Naeemullah, Tuzen M, Sari A, Turkekul I (2020) Influential bio-removal of mercury using Lactarius acerrimus macrofungus as novel low-cost biosorbent from aqueous solution: Isotherm modeling, kinetic and thermodynamic investigations. Mater Chem Phys 29(123168). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123168

Namdeti R (2023) A review on removal of heavy metals by biosorption: a green technology. Int J Res Rev 10(3): 531–543. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230360

Navarro Moreno LG, Vázquez Velasco L, Rangel Cordero A, González JM (2022) Contaminación y hongos: resistencia a metales pesados. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades. 3(2):215–232. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v3i2.76

Nofiani R, Komalasari RK, Puji Ardiningsih P, Santosa SJ (2022) Biosorption of Pb²⁺ using Fusarium sp. RS01, a Hg²⁺ and Pb²⁺-resistant indigenous fungus of an abandoned illegal gold mining site. Sains Malaysiana 51(6):1753–1764. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2022-5106-12

NOM-052-SEMARNAT (2005) Establece las características, el procedimiento de identificación, clasificación y los listados de los residuos peligrosos. 23 de junio de 2006

NOM-053-SEMARNAT-1993. Establece el procedimiento para llevar a cabo la prueba de extracción para determinar los constituyentes que hacen a un residuo peligroso por su toxicidad al ambiente

NOM-117-SSA1-1994, Bienes y servicios. Método de prueba para la determinación de cadmio, arsénico, plomo, estaño, cobre, Fierro, zinc y mercurio en alimentos, agua potable y agua purificada por espectrometría de absorción atómica. -NOM-127-SSA1–1994, Modificación a la Norma Oficial Mexicana, Salud ambiental. Agua para uso y consumo humano. “Límites permisibles de calidad y tratamientos a que debe someterse el agua para su potabilización”

NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-147-SEMARNAT/SSA1-2004, Que establece criterios para determinar las concentraciones de remediación de suelos contaminados por arsénico, bario, berilio, cadmio, cromo hexavalente, mercurio, níquel, plata, plomo, selenio, talio y/o vanadio

Lira MMA, Bernal SPF, Castro CCJ, Ramos PMM, Lira MJS, Ottoni JR, Boroski M, Passarini MRZ (2022) Filamentous fungi from textile effluent and their potential application for bioremediation process. Ann Acad Brasil Ciencias 94(2):1–12, e20201718. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202220201020

Oves M, Khan MS, Zaidi A (2013) Biosorption of heavy metals by Bacillus thuringiensis strain OSM29 originating from industrial effluent contaminated north Indian soil. Saudi J Biol Sci 20(2):121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.11.006CrossRef

Ozsoy HD (2010) Biosorptive removal of Hg(II) ions by Rhizopus oligosporus produced from corn-processing wastewater. Afr J Biotech 9(51):8791–8799. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.530CrossRef

Pavithra KG, SundarRajan P, Kumar PS, Rangasam G (2023) Mercury sources, contaminations, mercury cycle, detection and treatment techniques: a review. Chemosphere 312(1):137314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137314CrossRef

Pflender F, Heckman KA, Chalot M, Kennedy PG (2023) Fungal necromass presents a high potential for Mercury immobilization in soil. Chemosphere 311(1):1–5, 136994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136994

Pietro-Souza W, Mello IS, Vendruscullo SJ, Silva GF, Cunha CN, White JF, Soares MA (2017) Endophytic fungal communities of Polygonum acuminatum and Aeschynomene fluminensis are influenced by soil mercury contamination. PLoS ONE 12(7):1–24, e0182017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182017

Pietro-Souza W, de Campos Pereira F, Souza Mello I, Frutuoso Stachack FF, Terezo AJ, Nunes da Cunha C, White JF, Li H, Soares MA (2020) Mercury resistance and bioremediation mediated by endophytic fungi. Chemosphere 240(124874). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124874

Romero Zepeda H (2016) Acciones para la protección de la salud humana y el medio ambiente en la identificación de poblaciones vulnerables debida a la exposición de mercurio. Impacto socio-económico en el cumplimiento de las obligaciones del Convenio de Minamata. UAQ – UASLP (2016). Plan de desarrollo humano y tecnológico, sostenible, para la zona productora de mercurio del estado de Querétaro. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro. Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí. Documento Institucional. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/229177/1600_UNEP_INECC_UAQ_MinamataGe_nero_Dra_Hilda_Romero.pdf

Saba M, Falandysz J, Norom IC (2016) Accumulation and distribution of mercury in fruiting bodies by fungus Suillus luteus foraged in Poland, Belarus and Sweden. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:2749–2757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5513-4CrossRef

Saldaña-Villanueva K, Pérez-Vazquez FJ, Avila-García IP, Méndez-Rodríguez KB, Carrizalez-Yánez L, Gavilan-García A, Vargas-Morales JM, Van-Brusse E, Diaz-Barriga F (2022) A preliminary study on health impacts of Mexican mercury mining workers in a context of precarious employment. J Trace Elem Med Biol 71(126925):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2022.126925CrossRef

Sánchez-Castellón J, Urango-Cárdenas I, Enamorado-Montes G, Burgos-Nuñez S, Marrugo-Negrete J, Díez S (2022) Removal of mercury, cadmium, and lead ions by Penicillium sp. Front Environ Chem 2(795632):1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvc.2021.795632CrossRef

Santos EE, Cárdenas JF, Torre ME, Martínez VM, Rodríguez A, Acosta I (2017) Bioadsorción de arsénico(III) en solución acuosa por la biomasa modificada de Aspergillus niger. Avances En Ciencias e Ingeniería 8(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642017000600006CrossRef

Sarria-Villa RA, Gallo-Corredor A, Benítez Benítez R (2020) Tecnologías para remover metales pesados presentes en aguas. Caso Cromo y Mercurio. Journal of Ciencias e Ingeniería 12(1):94–109. https://doi.org/10.46571/JCI.2020.1.8CrossRef

Say R, Yilmaz N, Denizli A (2003) Removal of heavy metal ions using the fungus Penicillium canescens. Adsorpt Sci Technol 21(7):643–650. https://doi.org/10.1260/026361703772776420CrossRef

Sharma KR, Naruka A, Raja M, Sharma RK (2022) White rot fungus mediated removal of mercury from wastewater. Water Environ Res 94(7):643–650, e10769. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10769

Vacar CL, Covaci E, Chakraborty S, Li B, Weindorf DC, Frentiu T, Pârvu M, Podar D (2021) Heavy metal-resistant filamentous fungi as potential mercury bioremediators. J Fungi 7(386):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7050386CrossRef

Vaksmaa A, Guerrero-Cruz S, Ghosh P, Zeghal E, Hernando-Morales V, Niemann H (2023) Role of fungi in bioremediation of emerging pollutants. Front Mar Sci 10:1070905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1070905CrossRef

Vallejo Aguilar MLA, Marín Castro MA, Ramos Cassellis ME, Silva Gómez SE, Ibarra Cantún D, Tamariz Flores JV (2021) Biosorption and tolerance of Pb, Cr and Cd by the biomass of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. Ex Fr.) P. Kumm. Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas 12(2):275–289. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i2.2687

Yalcinkaya Y, Arica YM, Soysal L, Denizli A, Genc O, Bektas S (2002) Cadmium and mercury uptake by immobilized Pleurotus sapidus. Turk J Chem 26(3):441–452. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/chem/vol26/iss3/19

Titel: Biosorption of Mercury from Aqueous Solutions by Biosorbents
verfasst von: Ismael Acosta
Adriana Rodríguez
Juan Fernando Cárdenas
Víctor Manuel Martínez
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Buch: Mercury Toxicity
Print ISBN: 978-981-9977-18-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-9977-19-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7719-2_14