nach oben

Information Systems Frontiers

Erschienen in:

01.04.2008

Strategic dependence on the IT resource and outsourcing: A test of the strategic control model

verfasst von: Detmar Straub, Peter Weill, Kathy S. Schwaig

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 2/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Using resource dependency theory (RDT), this research analyzes how organizations control their information technology resources to improve organizational performance. According to RDT, organizations must manage their dependency on external organizations and limit external dependencies when resources are considered critical. The current study proposes and tests a portion of a Strategic Control Model positing that managers seek to control important, strategic resources in order to create value for the firm and to avoid dependency on external entities. Utilizing a research design that captured extensive quantitative data on the control of IT functions and services, the research team gathered 5 years of data on 54 business units (BUs) in 27 global companies located in seven countries. Study examined the linkages of these 54 BUs to firm performance. Locating the Extent of Control within the firm in cases where the firm depends on IT as a strategic resource proves to be a good explanation for effective decisions leading to higher performance. Viewing IT as a strategic resource alone does not lead to positive business unit outcomes, but the moderating influence of Extent of Control is found to establish the complex statistical relationship with business unit performance. For these reasons, it is critical that a theoretically grounded firm-wide process for decisions on locating IT control is in place to capture business value.

Vorheriger Artikel Information technology workforce skills: The software and IT services provider perspective

Nächster Artikel The impact of process standardization on business process outsourcing success

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Lacity and colleagues use the term “selective outsourcing” in apposition to total outsourcing or insourcing, which is why “Extent of Outsourcing” appears within these two extremes in Fig. 1. Our argument is a selective outsourcing argument in that firms that abjure total outsourcing are making decisions about not outsourcing what are viewed as strategic resources, which allows them more control over their core assets.

These results will be examined further in “Section 4”.

See www.aph.gov.au for details of a Federal Australian Government inquiry into IT outsourcing.

Particularly because we had numerous formative latent constructs in the SCM, we adopted a holistic data analysis approach with measurement and structural models being run simultaneously. That is, no confirmatory factor analysis preceded the structural model to “cleanse” the scales. A holistic analysis grants high conceptual integrity in the latent constructs. Holistic analysis retains the meaning of each construct, which is drawn from both its measurement items and the other latent variables (Bagozzi 1984).

Ang, S. (1994). Toward conceptual clarity of outsourcing. In B. C. Glasson, et al. (Ed.) Business process reengineering: Information systems opportunities and challenges (pp. 113–126). North Holland: Elsevier.

Ang, S., & Beath, C. M. (1993). Hierarchical elements in software contracts. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3(3), 329–361.CrossRef

Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (1998). Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the U.S. banking industry. MIS Quarterly, 22(4), 535–552.CrossRef

Bagozzi, R. P. (1984). A prospectus for theory construction in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 48, 11–29 (Winter).CrossRef

Beier, F. J. (1989). Transportation contracts and the experience effect: A framework for future research. Journal of Business Logistics, 10(2), 73–89.

Bender, D. H. (1986). Financial impact of information processing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(2), 22–32.

Birkinshaw, J., Toulan, O., & Arnold, D. (2001). Global account management in multinational corporations: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 231–248.CrossRef

Bradley, S. P., Housman, J. A., & Nolan, R. L. (1993). Globalization and technology. In S. P. Bradley, J. A. Housman, & R. L. Nolan (Eds.) Globalization, technology, and competition: The fusion of computers and telecommunications in the 1990s (pp. 3–32). Boston: Harvard Business School.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541–559.

Campbell, D. T. (1960). Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, discriminant validity. American Psychologist, 15, 546–553.CrossRef

Cash, J. I., McFarlan, F. W., McKenney, J. L., & Applegate, L. M. (1992). Corporate information systems management: Text and cases. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.) Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217.CrossRef

Clemons, E. K. (1991). Evaluation of strategic investments in information technology. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 24–36.CrossRef

Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1991). Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 275–292.CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, J., Marchi, M., & Velez, C. N. (1990). Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equation causal models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 183–196.CrossRef

Cron, W. L., & Sobol, M. G. (1983). The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing the benefits of computerization. Journal of Information Management, 6, 171–181.CrossRef

De Wit, K., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2000). Stakeholder in universities and colleges in Flanders. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 421–437.CrossRef

Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.CrossRef

Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., & Jayatilaka, B. (2004). Information systems outsourcing: A survey and analysis of the literature. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(4), 6–102.

Drtina, R. E. (1994). The outsourcing decision. Management Accounting, 75(9), 56–62.

Edwards, E. A., & Bagozzi, R. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 155–174.CrossRef

Floyd, S. W., & Woolridge, B. (1990). Path analysis of the relationship between competitive strategy, information technology, and financial performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 47–64.CrossRef

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRef

Fornell, C. R., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452.CrossRef

Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of AIS, 7(7), 1–78.

Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192.CrossRef

Grover, V., Cheon, M., & Teng, J. T. C. (1994). An evaluation of the impact of corporate strategy and the role of information technology on IS functional outsourcing. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(3), 179–190.

Grover, V., Cheon, M. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1996). The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 89–116.

Harris, S. E., & Katz, J. L. (1991). Organizational performance and information technology investment intensity in the insurance industry. Organization Science, 2(3), 263–295.

Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 121–142.CrossRef

Insinga, R. C., & Werle, M. J. (2000). Linking outsourcing to business strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 59–61.

Ives, B., & Learmonth, G. (1984). The information system as a competitive weapon. Communications of the ACM, 27(12), 1193–1201.CrossRef

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. P. (2002). Service provision and the net: Risky application sourcing? In Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A. and Dibbern, J. (Ed.) Information systems outsourcing: Enduring themes, emergent patterns, and future directions. Heidelberg: Springer.

Lacity, M. (1995). IT outsourcing: Maximize flexibility and control. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 84–93.

Lacity, M., & Hirschheim, R. (1993). Information systems outsourcing myths, metaphors, and realities. New York: Wiley.

Lacity, M., Hirschheim, R., & Willcocks, L. (1994). Realizing outsourcing expectations. Information Systems Management, 11(4), 7–18.CrossRef

Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: Lessons from experience. MIS Quarterly, 22, 363–408.CrossRef

Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (2001). Global information technology outsourcing: In search of business advantage. Chicester, UK: Wiley.

Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Diffusion of information technology outsourcing: Influence sources and the Kodak effect. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 334–378.

Markus, L. M., & Soh, C. (1993). Banking on information technology: Converting IT spending into firm performance. In Banker, R. D., Kauffman, R. J. and Mahmood, M. A. (Ed.) Strategic and economic impacts of information technology investment: Perspectives on organizational growth and competitive advantage (pp. 364–392). Middletown, PA: Idea Group.

Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86–112.

Nam, K. S., Rajagopalan, H., Rao, R., & Chaudhury, A. (1996). A two-level investigation of information systems outsourcing. Communications of the ACM, 39(7), 36–44.CrossRef

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in IS research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependency perspective. New York: Harper & Row (Stanford University Press, originally published 1978).

Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you a competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63, 149–160.

Prahalad, C. K. (1993). The Role of core competencies in the corporation. Research-Technology Management, 36(6), 40–47.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.

Quinn, J. B., & Hilmer, F. G. (1994). Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 35(4), 43–55.

Richmond, W. B., Seidmann, A., & Whinston, A. B. (1992a). Incomplete contracting issues in information systems development outsourcing. Decision Support Systems, 8(5), 459–477.CrossRef

Richmond, W. B., Seidmann, A., & Whinston, A. B. (1992b). Contract theory and information technology outsourcing. Decision Support Systems, 8(5), 459–477.CrossRef

Schary, P. B., & Coakley, J. (1991). Logistics organization and the information system. International Journal of Logistics Management, 2(2), 22–29.CrossRef

Sethi, V., & King, W. (1994). Development of measures to access the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Science, 40(12), 1601–1627.CrossRef

Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 291–299.CrossRef

Smith, H. J., Stoddard, D., & Applegate, L. (1987). Manufacturers hangover: The new organization A, B and C (9-189-051). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Teng, J. T. C., Cheon, M. J., & Grover, V. (1995). Decisions to outsource information systems functions: Testing a strategy-theoretic discrepancy model. Decision Sciences, 26(1), 75–103.CrossRef

Thompson, R., Barclay, D. W., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 284–324.

Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 423–444.CrossRef

Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 307–333.

Weill, P., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: How market leaders capitalise on information technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Titel: Strategic dependence on the IT resource and outsourcing: A test of the strategic control model
verfasst von: Detmar Straub
Peter Weill
Kathy S. Schwaig
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2008
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 2/2008
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9064-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2008

Firm strategic profile and IT outsourcing

The impact of process standardization on business process outsourcing success

The impact of cultural differences in offshore outsourcing—Case study results from German–Indian application development projects

Information technology workforce skills: The software and IT services provider perspective

Turnover intentions of Indian IS professionals

Foreword to the special issue on IS sourcing

Premium Partner