skip to main content
10.1145/1054972.1055100acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices

Published:02 April 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

The potential for sensor-enabled mobile devices to proactively present information when and where users need it ranks among the greatest promises of ubiquitous computing. Unfortunately, mobile phones, PDAs, and other computing devices that compete for the user's attention can contribute to interruption irritability and feelings of information overload. Designers of mobile computing interfaces, therefore, require strategies for minimizing the perceived interruption burden of proactively delivered messages. In this work, a context-aware mobile computing device was developed that automatically detects postural and ambulatory activity transitions in real time using wireless accelerometers. This device was used to experimentally measure the receptivity to interruptions delivered at activity transitions relative to those delivered at random times. Messages delivered at activity transitions were found to be better received, thereby suggesting a viable strategy for context-aware message delivery in sensor-enabled mobile computing devices.

References

  1. E. Arroyo, T. Selker, and A. Stouffs. Interruptions as multimodal outputs: which are the less disruptive? In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pages 479--482. IEEE Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B.P. Bailey, J.A. Konstan, and J.V. Carlis. Measuring the effects of interruptions on task performance in the user interface. In IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2000 (SMC 2000), pages 757--762. IEEE Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. L. Bao and S.S. Intille. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In A. Ferscha and F. Mattern, editors, Proceedings of PERVASIVE 2004, volume LNCS 3001, pages 1--17. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. E. Cutrell, M. Czerwinski, and E. Horvitz. Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks. In Extended Abstracts of CHI 2000, Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Cutrell, M. Czerwinski, and E. Horvitz. Notification, disruption and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In M. Hirose, editor, Human-Computer Interaction-Interact '01, pages 263--269. IOS Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Fogarty, S.E. Hudson, and J. Lai. Examining the robustness of sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Garlan, D. Siewiorek, A. Smailagic, and P. Steenkiste. Project Aura: toward distraction-free pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing, April-June:22-31, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Gillie and D. Broadbent. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research, 50(4):243--50, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S.M. Hess and M. Detweiler. Training to reduce the disruptive effects of interruptions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, volume 2, pages 1173--1177. Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K. Hinckley and E. Horvitz. Toward more sensitive mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 191--192. ACM Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Ho. Interruptions: Using Activity Transitions to Trigger Proactive Messages. M.Eng. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Horvitz and J. Apacible. Learning and reasoning about interruption. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pages 20--27. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. E. Horvitz, A. Jacobs, and D. Hovel. Attention-sensitive alerting. In K.B. Laskey and H. Prade, editors, UAI '99: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 305--513. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. E. Horvitz, C.M. Kadie, T. Paek, and D. Hovel. Models of attention in computing and communications: from principles to applications. Communications of the ACM, 46(3):52--59, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. Horvitz, P. Koch, C. Kadie, and A. Jacobs. Coordinates: probabilistic forecasting of presence and availability. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-02), pages 224--233. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J.M. Hudson, J. Christensen, W.A. Kellogg, and T. Erickson. 'I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do:' availability and interruption in research management. In Proceedings of the Confererence on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S.E. Hudson, J. Fogarty, C.G. Atkeson, D. Avrahami, J. Forlizzi, S. Kiesler, J.C. Lee, and J. Yang. Predicting human interruptability with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors and Computing, pages 257--264. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. N. Kern and B. Schiele. Context-aware notification for wearable computing. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wearable Computing, pages 223--230. IEEE Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. N. Kern, B. Schiele, and A. Schmidt. Multi-sensor activity context detection for wearable computing. In European Symposium on Ambient Intelligence (EUSAI), volume LNCS 2875, pages 220--232. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. K.K. Liu. A Personal, Mobile System for Understanding Stress and Interruptions. S.M. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. P. Lukowicz, H. Junker, M. Staeger, T. von Bueren, and G. Troester. WearNET: a distributed multi-sensor system for context aware wearables. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pages 361--370. Springer, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C.E. McCarthy and M.E. Pollack. A plan-based personalized cognitive orthotic. In M. Ghallab, J. Hertzberg, and P. Traverso, editors, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, pages 243--252. AAAI Press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D.S. McCrickard and C.M. Chewar. Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs. Communications of the ACM, 45(3):67--72, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D.C. McFarlane. Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. In A. Sasse and C. Johnson, editors, Human-Computer Interaction -INTERACT'99, pages 295--303. IOS Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Y. Miyata and D.A. Norman. Psychological issues in support of multiple activities. In D.A. Norman and S.W. Draper, editors, User-Centered System Design, pages 265--284. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. D.P. Siewiorek, A. Smailagic, J. Furukawa, A. Krause, N. Moraveji, K. Reiger, J. Shaffer, and F.L. Wong. SenSay: a context-aware mobile phone. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pages 248--249. IEEE Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. C. Speier, J.S. Valacich, and I. Vessey. The effects of task interruption and information presentation on individual decision making. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems, pages 21--36. Association for Information Systems, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. A.A. Stone and S. Shiffman. Capturing momentary, self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(3):236--243, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. N.A. Storch. Does the user interface make interruptions disruptive? A study of interface style and form of interruption. UCRL-JC-108993, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. E.M. Tapia, N. Marmasse, S.S. Intille, and K. Larson. MITes: Wireless portable sensors for studying behavior. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts Ubicomp 2004: Ubiquitous Computing. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. M. van Dantzich, D. Robbins, E. Horvitz, and M. Czerwinski. Scope: providing awareness of multiple notifications at a glance. In Proceedings of AVI 2002, ACM Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces.ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. R. van Solingen, E. Berghout, and F. van Latum. Interrupts: just a minute never is. IEEE Software, 15(5):97--103, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2005
      928 pages
      ISBN:1581139985
      DOI:10.1145/1054972

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 April 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '05 Paper Acceptance Rate93of372submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader