Michael S. Horn
Erin Treacy Solovey
R. Jordan Crouser
Robert J.K. Jacob
ABSTRACT
Much of the work done in the field of tangible interaction has focused on creating tools for learning; however, in many cases, little evidence has been provided that tangible interfaces offer educational benefits compared to more conventional interaction techniques. In this paper, we present a study comparing the use of a tangible and a graphical interface as part of an interactive computer programming and robotics exhibit that we designed for the Boston Museum of Science. In this study, we have collected observations of 260 museum visitors and conducted interviews with 13 family groups. Our results show that visitors found the tangible and the graphical systems equally easy to understand. However, with the tangible interface, visitors were significantly more likely to try the exhibit and significantly more likely to actively participate in groups. In turn, we show that regardless of the condition, involving multiple active participants leads to significantly longer interaction times. Finally, we examine the role of children and adults in each condition and present evidence that children are more actively involved in the tangible condition, an effect that seems to be especially strong for girls.
Supplemental Material
- AAUW, Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.Google Scholar
- Allen, S. Designs for Learning: Studying Science Museum Exhibits That Do More Than Entertain. Science Education, 88 (S1), Wiley Periodicals (2004), S17--S33.Google Scholar
- Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to Robots: Learning with Technology in the Early Childhood Classroom. Teachers College Press, NY, NY.Google Scholar
- Buechley, L., Eisenberg, M., Catchen, J. and Crockett, A. The LilyPad Arduino: Using Computational Textiles to Investigate Engagement, Aesthetics, and Diversity in Computer Science Education. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clements, D.H. The future of educational computing research: the case of computer programming. Information Technology in Childhood Education, (1999), 147--179.Google Scholar
- Conway, M., Pausch, R., Gossweiler, R., and Burnette, T. 1994. Alice: a rapid prototyping system for building virtual environments. In Proc. of CHI '94. ACM Press (1994), New York, NY, 295--296. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fernaeus, Y. and Tholander, J. Finding design qualities in a tangible programming space. In Proc. of CHI '06. ACM Press (2006), New York, NY, 447--456. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frei, P., Su, V., Mikhak, B., Ishii, H. Curlybot: designing a new class of computational toys. In Proc. of CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 129--136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haugland, S.W. The Effect of Computer Software on Preschool Children's Developmental Gains. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 3(1), (1992), 15--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heath, C., vom Lehn, D., Osborne, J. Interaction and interactives: collaboration and participation with computer-based exhibits. Public Understanding of Science 14, Sage Publications (2005), 19--101.Google Scholar
- Horn, M. TopCode: Tangible Object Placement Codes. http://hci.cs.tufts.edu/topcodes/Google Scholar
- Horn, M. and Jacob, R.J.K. Designing Tangible Programming Languages for Classroom Use. In Proc. First International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction TEI'07, (2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Horn, M., Solovey, E. T., Jacob, R.J.K. Tangible Programming and Informal Science Learning: Making TUIs Work for Museums, In Proc. IDC 2008 Conference on Interaction Design for Children (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction. In Proc. of CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 437--446. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., Rogers, Y. From entry to access - how sharability comes about. In Proc. Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces DPPI'07, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hornecker, E. and Stifter, M. Learning from Interactive Museum Installations About Interaction Design for Public Settings. In Proc. Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference OZCHI'06, (2006). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Humphrey, T. and Gutwill, J.P. Fostering Active Prolonged Engagement: The art of creating APE exhibits. Exploratorium, (2005).Google Scholar
- Inkpen, K., Booth, K.S., Klawe, M., and Upitis, R. Playing Together Beats Playing Apart, Especially for Girls. In. Proc. Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning CSCL'95, Lawrence Erlbaum (1995), 177--181. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob, R.J.K., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L.M., Horn, M.S. Shaer, O., Solovey, E.T., and Zigelbaum, J. Reality-Based Interaction: A Framework for Post-WIMP Interfaces. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelleher, C. and Pausch, R. 2005. Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Comput. Surv. 37, 2 (Jun. 2005), 83--137 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., and Kiesler, S. Storytelling alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In Proc. of CHI 2007. ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marshall, P. Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? In Proc. First international conference on tangible and embedded interaction TEI'07, ACM Press (2007), 163--170. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McNerney, T.S. From turtles to tangible programming bricks: explorations in physical language design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2004) 8, Springer-Verlag (2004), 326--337. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Montemayor, J., Druin, A., Farber, A., Simms, S., Churaman, W., and D'Amour, A. Physical programming: designing tools for children to create physical interactive environments. In Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 299--306. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Malley, C. and Stanton Fraser, D. Report 12: Literature review in learning with tangible technologies. Technical report, NESTA Futurelab (2004).Google Scholar
- Papert, S. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, (1980). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parkes, A., Raffle, H., and Ishii, H. Topobo in the wild: longitudinal evaluations of educators appropriating a tangible interface.Google Scholar
- Resnick, M., Bruckman, A., and Martin, F. Pianos not stereos: creating computational construction kits. Interactions, 3(6), (1996). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Resnick, M. Sowing the seeds for a more creative society. Learning and Leading with Technology, International Society for Technology in Education (2007), 18--22.Google Scholar
- Rizzo, F. and Garzotto, F. "The Fire and The Mountain": Tangible and Social Interaction in a Museum Exhibition for Children. In Proc. IDC '07, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Gabrielli, S., Smith, H., and Harris, E. A conceptual framework for mixed reality environments: designing novel learning activities for young children. Presence, 11(6), MIT Press (2002), 677--686. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scharf, F., Winkler, T., and Herczeg, M. Tangicons: Algorithmic Reasoning in a Collaborative Game for Children in Kindergarten and First Class. In Proc. Interaction Design and Children IDC'08. (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schweikardt, E. and Gross, M.D. The robot is the program: interacting with roBlocks. In Proc. Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction TEI'08, (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott, S.D., Shoemaker, G.B.D., and Inkpen, K.M. Towards seamless support of natural collaborative interactions. In Proc. Graphics Interface. Montreal, Canada, (2000), 103--110.Google Scholar
- Serrell, B. Exhibit Labels: An Interpretive Approach. AltaMira Press (1996).Google Scholar
- Smith, A. Handcrafted physical syntax elements for illiterate children: initial concepts. In Proc. Interaction Design and Children IDC'08, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stringer, M., Rode, J.A., Toye, E.F., Blackwell, A.F., and Simpson, A.R. The Webkit Tangible User Interface: A Case Study of Iterative Prototyping. Pervasive Computing, 4(4), IEEE Computer Society (2005), 35--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suzuki, H. and Kato, H. Interaction-level support for collaborative learning: Algoblock-an open programming language. In Proc. CSCL '95, Lawrence Erlbaum (1995). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vegso, J. Drop in CS Bachelor's Degree Production. Computing Research News, 18(2), (2006).Google Scholar
- West, R. The Economics of Interactivity. Curator 47(2), AltaMira Press (2004), 213--223.Google Scholar
- Wyeth, P. How young children learn to program with sensor, action, and logic blocks. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(4), Routledge (2008), 517--550.Google Scholar
- Xie, L., Antle, A.N., and Motamedi, N. Are tangibles more fun? Comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In Proc. Tangible and Embedded Interaction TEI'08, (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zheng, S., Bromage, A. Adam, M. and Scrivener, S.A. Surprising Creativity: A Cognitive Framework for Interactive Exhibits Designed for Children. In Proc. Creativity&Cognition, ACM Press (2007), 17--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zuckerman, O., Grotzer, T. and Leahy, K., Flow blocks as a conceptual bridge between understanding the structure and behavior of a complex causal system. In Proc. ICLS'06, (2006). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Comparing the use of tangible and graphical programming languages for informal science education
Recommendations
Tangible programming and informal science learning: making TUIs work for museums
IDC '08: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and childrenIn this paper we describe the design and initial evaluation of a tangible computer programming exhibit for children on display at the Boston Museum of Science. We also discuss five design considerations for tangible interfaces in science museums that ...
Tangible versus graphical user interfaces for robot programming: exploring cross-age children's preferences
This study explores children's opinions and preferences regarding two isomorphic user interfaces that can be used for introductory programming activities, a tangible and a graphical one. The first system (tangible) comprises 46 cube-shaped blocks that ...
Smart Objects and Replicas: A Survey of Tangible and Embodied Interactions in Museums and Cultural Heritage Sites
Tangible and embodied interactions are areas of research within HCI and interaction design. They refer to a way in which interacting with computer systems is closer to the way we interact with the real world. Instead of using devices such as a computer or ...
Comments