skip to main content
10.1145/1562877.1562888acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Coverage of course topics in a student generated MCQ repository

Published:06 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

A recent approach to engaging students in deep learning involves an online tool, PeerWise, through which students contribute multiple-choice questions to a shared question bank. Earlier work demonstrated a strong correlation between the use of PeerWise and student performance. In this study we investigate the quality of the MCQ repository created by students in an introductory programming course by analysing the range of topics on which students chose to write questions (i.e.~the repository coverage) without guidance from an instructor. We assess the repository coverage by comparing it with a common list of typical introductory programming topics, and by looking at its extent. We find that, despite having freedom to choose any topic, students created a repository that covered all the major topics in the curriculum.

References

  1. M. Birenbaum and R. A. Feldman. Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1):90--97, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Denny, J. Hamer, A. Luxton-Reilly, and H. Purchase. PeerWise: Students sharing their multiple choice questions. In ICER '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Computing education research, pages 51--58, Sydney, Australia, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions. In Simon and M. Hamilton, editors, Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2008), volume 78 of CRPIT, pages 69--74, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2008. ACS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. Student use of the PeerWise system. In ITICSE '08: Proceedings of the 13th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, pages 73--77, Madrid, Spain, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and B. Simon. Quality of student contributed questions using PeerWise. In M. Hamilton and T. Clear, editors, Eleventh Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2009), volume 95 of CRPIT, Wellington, New Zealand, 2009. ACS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Hamer, Q. Cutts, J. Jackova, A. Luxton-Reilly, R. McCartney, H. Purchase, C. Riedesel, M. Saeli, K. Sanders, and J. Sheard. Contributing student pedagogy. SIGCSE Bull., 40(4):194--212, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Nicol. E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1):53--64, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. C. Schulte and J. Bennedsen. What do teachers teach in introductory programming? In ICER '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Computing education research, pages 17--28, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. Scouller. The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35:453--472, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Coverage of course topics in a student generated MCQ repository

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITiCSE '09: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
      July 2009
      428 pages
      ISBN:9781605583815
      DOI:10.1145/1562877

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 July 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ITiCSE '09 Paper Acceptance Rate66of205submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

      Upcoming Conference

      ITiCSE 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader