skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037396acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The effects of walking speed on target acquisition on a touchscreen interface

Published:30 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Studies have reported negative effects of walking on mobile human---computer interaction when compared to standing or sitting. However, the quantitative relationship between walking speed and user performance is unknown. In the study described here, we varied walking speed on a treadmill and measured effects on discrete aiming movements on a touchscreen interface. Their relationship was found to be non-linear with a local optimum: when walking at 40--80% of one's preferred walking speed (PWS), target acquisition performance plateaus, indicating optimal trade-off between speed and interaction. Accelerometer data showed that, despite increasing hand oscillation, users were able to maintain stable interaction performance at 74% of PWS. Interestingly, this speed coincides with the speed users spontaneously walk when interacting with a mobile device.

References

  1. Barnard, L., Yi, J. S., Jacko, J. A., and Sears, A. An empirical comparison of use-in-motion evaluation scenarios for mobile computing devices. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 4 (2005), 487--520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brewster, S. Overcoming the lack of screen space on mobile computers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 3 (2002), 188--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cotes, J. and Meade, F. The energy expenditure and mechanical energy demand in walking. Ergonomics, 3, 2 (1960), 97--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Crossan, A., Murray-Smith, R., Brewster, S., Kelly, J., and Musizza, B. Gait phase effects in mobile interaction. Ext. Abs. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 1312--1315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Crossan, A., Murray-Smith, R., Brewster, S., and Musizza, B. Instrumented usability analysis for mobile devices. Handbook of Mobile HCI. The Ideas Group Inc. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., and Smith, I. E. Getting off the treadmill: evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. Proc. MobileHCI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 109--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kjeldskov, J. and Stage, J. New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems. Intl. J. of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 5--6 (2004), 599--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lin, M., Goldman, R., Price, K. J., Sears, A., and Jacko, J. How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. Intl. J. of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 9 (2007), 759--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. MacKay, B., Dearman, D., Inkpen, K., and Watters, C. Walk'n scroll: a comparison of software-based navigation techniques for different levels of mobility. In Proc. MobileHCI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 183--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mustonen, T., Olkkonen, M., and Hakkinen, J. Examining mobile phone text legibility while walking. Ext. Abs. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1243--1246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., and Kuorelahti, J. Interaction in 4--second bursts: The fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. Proc. CHI2005, ACM Press (2005), New York, pp. 919--928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pirhonen, A., Brewster, S., and Holguin, C. Gestural and audio metaphors as a means of control for mobile devices. Proc. CHI2002, ACM Press (2002), 291--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ralston, H. Energy-speed relation and optimal speed during level walking. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 17, 4 (1958), 277--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Riley, P. O., Paolini, G., Della Croce, U., Paylo, K. W., and Kerrigan, D. C. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait & Posture, 26, 1 (2007), 17--24Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Schildbach, B. and Rukzio, E. Investigating selection and reading performance on a mobile phone while walking. Proc. MobileHCI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yatani, K. and Truong, K. N. An evaluation of stylus-based text entry methods on handheld devices studied in different user mobility states. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5, 5 (2009), 496--508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The effects of walking speed on target acquisition on a touchscreen interface

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      August 2011
      781 pages
      ISBN:9781450305419
      DOI:10.1145/2037373

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 August 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader