Abstract
In recent years, different proposals have been made to exploit Social Web tagging information to build more effective recommender systems. The tagging data, for example, were used to identify similar users or were viewed as additional information about the recommendable items. Recent research has indicated that “attaching feelings to tags” is experienced by users as a valuable means to express which features of an item they particularly like or dislike. When following such an approach, users would therefore not only add tags to an item as in usual Web 2.0 applications, but also attach a preference (affect) to the tag itself, expressing, for example, whether or not they liked a certain actor in a given movie. In this work, we show how this additional preference data can be exploited by a recommender system to make more accurate predictions.
In contrast to previous work, which also relied on so-called tag preferences to enhance the predictive accuracy of recommender systems, we argue that tag preferences should be considered in the context of an item. We therefore propose new schemes to infer and exploit context-specific tag preferences in the recommendation process. An evaluation on two different datasets reveals that our approach is capable of providing more accurate recommendations than previous tag-based recommender algorithms and recent tag-agnostic matrix factorization techniques.
- Adomavicius, G. and Kwon, Y. 2007. New recommendation techniques for multicriteria rating systems. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22, 3, 48--55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adomavicius, G. and Tuzhilin, A. 2001. Extending recommender systems: A multidimensional approach. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization (ITWP'01). 4--6.Google Scholar
- Berners-Lee, T. 2006. Linked data. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.Google Scholar
- Bogers, T. and van den Bosch, A. 2009. Collaborative and content-based filtering for item recommendation on social bookmarking websites. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Recommender Systems and the Social Web (RSWEB'09). 9--16.Google Scholar
- Chang, C.-C. and Lin, C.-J. 2011. Libsvm: A library for support vector machines. http://www.csie.ntu. edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm. Google ScholarDigital Library
- de Gemmis, M., Lops, P., Semeraro, G., and Basile, P. 2008. Integrating tags in a semantic content-based recommender. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'08). 163--170. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diederich, J. and Iofciu, T. 2006. Finding communities of practice from user profiles based on folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Building Technology Enhanced Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice (TEL-CoPs'06). 288--297.Google Scholar
- Funk, S. 2006. Netflix update: Try this at home. http://sifter.org/~simon/journal/20061211.html.Google Scholar
- Gedikli, F., Ge, M., and Jannach, D. 2011a. Explaining online recommendations using personalized tag clouds. i-com 10, 1, 3--10.Google Scholar
- Gedikli, F., Ge, M., and Jannach, D. 2011b. Understanding recommendations by reading the clouds. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-Web'11).Google Scholar
- Gedikli, F. and Jannach, D. 2010. Rating items by rating tags. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Recommender Systems and the Social Web (RSWEB'10). 25--32.Google Scholar
- Gemmell, J., Ramezani, M., Schimoler, T., Christiansen, L., and Mobasher, B. 2009. The impact of ambiguity and redundancy on tag recommendation in folksonomies. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09). 45--52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heath, T. and Motta, E. 2007. Revyu.com: A reviewing and rating site for the web of data. In The Semantic Web, Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'07 + ASWC'07). 895--902. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hotho, A., Jaschke, R., Schmitz, C., and Stumme, G. 2006. Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC'06). 411--426. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Felfernig, A., and Friedrich, G. 2010. Recommender Systems An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jäschke, R., Marinho, L. B., Hotho, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L., and Stumme, G. 2007. Tag recommendations in folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD'07). 506--514. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ji, A.-T., Yeon, C., Kim, H.-N., and Jo, G.-S. 2007. Collaborative tagging in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 20th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AUS-AI'07). 377--386. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, H.-N., Ji, A.-T., Ha, I., and Jo, G.-S. 2010. Collaborative filtering based on collaborative tagging for enhancing the quality of recommendation. Electron. Commerce Res. Appl. 9, 1, 73--83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liang, H., Xu, Y., Li, Y., and Nayak, R. 2009. Collaborative filtering recommender systems based on popular tags. In Proceedings of the 14th Australasian Document Computing Symposium (ADCS'09).Google Scholar
- Mooney, R. J. and Roy, L. 2000. Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (DL'00). 195--204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nakagawa, M. and Mobasher, B. 2003. A hybrid web personalization model based on site connectivity. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis (WebKDD'03). 59--70.Google Scholar
- Pilászy, I. and Tikk, D. 2009. Recommending new movies: Even a few ratings are more valuable than metadata. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09). 93--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Porter, M. F. 1997. An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 313--316. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salakhutdinov, R. and Mnih, A. 2008. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press, 1257--1264.Google Scholar
- Sandvig, J. J., Mobasher, B., and Burke, R. 2007. Robustness of collaborative recommendation based on association rule mining. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'07). 105--112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sen, S., Harper, F. M., LaPitz, A., and Riedl, J. 2007. The quest for quality tags. In Proceedings of the International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP'07). 361--370. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sen, S., Vig, J., and Riedl, J. 2009a. Learning to recognize valuable tags. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'09). 87--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sen, S., Vig, J., and Riedl, J. 2009b. Tagommenders: Connecting users to items through tags. In Proceedings of the 18th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW'09). 671--680. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shirky, C. 2005. Ontology is overrated. http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html.Google Scholar
- Tintarev, N. and Masthoff, J. 2007. Effective explanations of recommendations: User-centered design. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'07). 153--156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tso-Sutter, K. H. L., Marinho, L. B., and Schmidt-Thieme, L. 2008. Tag-aware recommender systems by fusion of collaborative filtering algorithms. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC'08). 1995--1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vig, J., Sen, S., and Riedl, J. 2009. Tagsplanations: Explaining recommendations using tags. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'09). 47--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vig, J., Soukup, M., Sen, S., and Riedl, J. 2010. Tag expression: Tagging with feeling. In Proceedings of the 23nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'10). 323--332. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, Z., Wang, Y., and Wu, H. 2010. Tags meet ratings: Improving collaborative filtering with tag-based neighborhood method. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Social Recommender Systems (SRS'10). 15--23.Google Scholar
- Zhang, J. and Pu, P. 2007. A recursive prediction algorithm for collaborative filtering recommender systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'07). 57--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhang, N., Zhang, Y., and Tang, J. 2009. A tag recommendation system for folksonomy. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Social Web Search and Mining (SWSM'09). 9--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhen, Y., Li, W.-J., and Yeung, D.-Y. 2009. Tagicofi: Tag informed collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09). 69--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhou, T. C., Ma, H., King, I., and Lyu, M. R. 2009. Tagrec: Leveraging tagging wisdom for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE'09) Vol. 4. 194--199. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Improving recommendation accuracy based on item-specific tag preferences
Recommendations
Userrank for item-based collaborative filtering recommendation
With the recent explosive growth of the Web, recommendation systems have been widely accepted by users. Item-based Collaborative Filtering (CF) is one of the most popular approaches for determining recommendations. A common problem of current item-based ...
Improving Cold Start Recommendation by Mapping Feature-Based Preferences to Item Comparisons
UMAP '17: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and PersonalizationMany Recommender Systems (RSs) rely on user preference data in the form of ratings or likes for items. Previous research has shown that item comparisons can also be effectively used to model user preferences and build RS. However, users often express ...
Improving Accuracy of Recommender System by Item Clustering
Recommender System (RS) predicts user's ratings towards items, and then recommends highly-predicted items to user. In recent years, RS has been playing more and more important role in the agent research field. There have been a great deal of researches ...
Comments