skip to main content
research-article

Field-aligned mesh joinery

Published:07 February 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Mesh joinery is an innovative method to produce illustrative shape approximations suitable for fabrication. Mesh joinery is capable of producing complex fabricable structures in an efficient and visually pleasing manner. We represent an input geometry as a set of planar pieces arranged to compose a rigid structure, by exploiting an efficient slit mechanism. Since slices are planar, to fabricate them a standard 2D cutting system is enough.

We automatically arrange slices according to a smooth cross-field defined over the surface. Cross-fields allow representing global features that characterize the appearance of the shape. Slice placement conforms to specific manufacturing constraints.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Autodesk. 2013. 123D make. http://www.123dapp.com/make/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. B. Bickel, M. Bacher, M. A. Otaduy, H. R. Lee, H. Pfister, M. Gross, and W. Matusik. 2010. Design and fabrication of materials with desired deformation behavior. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 3, 63:1--63:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Bo, H. Pottmann, M. Kilian, W. Wang, and J. Wallner. 2011. Circular arc structures. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 101, 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Bobkov, C. Houdr, and P. Tetali. 2000. Lambda and infinity, vertex isoperimetry and concentration. Combinatorica 20, 2, 153--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. Bommes, B. Levy, N. Pietroni, E. Puppo, C. Silva, M. Tarini, and D. Zorin. 2012. State of the art in quad meshing. In EG'12 State of the Art Reports, M.-P. Cani and F. Ganovelli, Eds., EuroGraphics Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Bommes, H. Zimmer, and L. Kobbelt. 2009. Mixed-integer quadrangulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3, 77:1--77:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Cignoni, E. Gobbetti, R. Pintus, and R. Scopigno. 2008. Color enhancement for rapid prototyping. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST'08). EuroGraphics Association, 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Dimitrov, K. Schreve, and N. De Beer. 2006. Advances in three dimensional printing state of the art and future perspectives. Rapid Prototyp. J. 12, 136--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Y. Dong, J. Wang, F. Pellacini, X. Tong, and B. Guo. 2010. Fabricating spatially-varying subsurface scattering. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 62:1--62:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Eigensatz, M. Kilian, A. Schiftner, N. J. Mitra, H. Pottmann, and M. Pauly. 2010. Paneling architectural freeform surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 45:1--45:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C.-W. Fu, C.-F. Lai, Y. He, and D. Cohen-Or. 2010. K-set tilable surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 44:1--44:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Hasan, M. Fuchs, W. Matusik, H. Pfister, and S. Rusinkiewicz. 2010. Physical reproduction of materials with specified subsurface scattering. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 61:1--61:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Hertzmann and D. Zorin. 2000. Illustrating smooth surfaces. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH'00). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley, New York, 517--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Hildebrand, B. Bickel, and M. Alexa. 2012. Crdbrd: Shape fabrication by sliding planar slices. Comput. Graph. Forum 31, 583--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Holroyd, I. Baran, J. Lawrence, and W. Matusik. 2011. Computing and fabricating multilayer models. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 187:1--187:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Johnson. 2013. Clipper library 5.1.6- An open source freeware polygon clipping library. http://www.angusj.com/delphi/clipper.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. F. Kalberer, M. Nieser, and K. Polthier. 2007. Quadcover- Surface parameterization using branched coverings. Comput. Graph. Forum 26, 3, 375--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. X.-Y. Li, T. Ju, Y. Gu, and S.-M. Hu. 2011. A geometric study of v-style pop-ups: Theories and algorithms. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 4, 98:1--98:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. X.-Y. Li, C.-H. Shen, S.-S. Huang, T. Ju, and S.-M. Hu. 2010. Popup: Automatic paper architectures from 3D models. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 111:1--111:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K.-Y. Lo, C.-W. Fu, and H. Li. 2009. 3D polyomino puzzle. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5, 157:1--157:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. F. Massarwi, C. Gotsman, and G. Elber. 2007. Papercraft models using generalized cylinders. In Proceedings of the 15th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications. IEEE Computer Society, 148--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. W. Matusik, B. Ajdin, J. Gu, J. Lawrence, H. P. A. Lensch, F. Pellacini, and S. Rusinkiewicz. 2009. Printing spatially-varying reflectance. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5, 128:1--128:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. M. McCarthy and G. S. Soh. 2000. Geometric Design of Linkages, Vol. 11. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. McCrae, K. Singh, and N. J. Mitra. 2011. Slices: A shape-proxy based on planar sections. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 6, 168:1--168:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Mitani and H. Suzuki. 2004. Making papercraft toys from meshes using strip-based approximate unfolding. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 259--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Y. Mori and T. Igarashi. 2007. Plushie: An interactive design system for plush toys. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 45:1--45:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. D. Panozzo, Y. Lipman, E. Puppo, and D. Zorin. 2012. Fields on symmetric surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 4, 111:1--111:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. N. Pietroni, M. Tarini, O. Sorkine, and D. Zorin. 2011. Global parameterization of range image sets. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 6, 149:1--149:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. H. Pottmann, Q. Huang, B. Deng, A. Schiftner, M. Kilian, L. Guibas, and J. Wallner. 2010. Geodesic patterns. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 43:1--43:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. N. Ray, W. C. Li, B. Levy, A. Sheffer, and P. Alliez. 2006. Periodic global parameterization. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 1460--1485. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. N. Ray, B. Vallet, L. Alonso, and B. Levy. 2009. Geometry aware direction field processing. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 1:1--1:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Y. Schwartzburg and M. Pauly. 2012. Design and optimization of orthogonally intersecting planar surfaces. In Computational Design Modeling, C. Gengnagel, A. Kilian, N. Palz, and F. Scheurer, Eds., Springer, Berlin, 191--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Y. Schwartzburg and M. Pauly. 2013. Fabrication-aware design with intersecting planar pieces. Comput. Graph. Forum 32, 2pt3, 317--326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. C. H. Sequin. 2012. Prototyping dissection puzzles with layered manufacturing. In Proceedings of the Fabrication and Sculpture Track, Shape Modeling International Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. I. Shatz, A. Tal, and G. Leifman. 2006. Paper craft models from meshes. Vis. Comput. 22, 825--834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. M. Singh and S. Schaefer. 2010. Triangle surfaces with discrete equivalence classes. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 46:1--46:7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. T. Weyrich, P. Peers, W. Matusik, and S. Rusinkiewicz. 2009. Fabricating microgeometry for custom surface reflectance. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3, 32:1--32:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. S. Xin, C.-F. Lai, C.-W. Fu, T.-T. Wong, Y. He, and D. Cohen-Or. 2011. Making burr puzzles from 3d models. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 4, 97:1--97:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Field-aligned mesh joinery

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        Eugene Zhang

        The computer graphics field has become more physical in recent years. While images are still considered the end goal by many, there is growing interest in the graphics community to create physical objects that can be touched and held. Cignoni and his co-authors developed a technique that allows a digitally stored 3D model to be physicalized. This technique is termed mesh joinery, as the end product is an interlocking structure of planar pieces that approximate a 3D model such as a human or animal. The goal for the physical model is physical stability: it should actually be able to stand on its own without falling or collapsing. The trick is to make use of cross fields, mathematical objects that have found much use in geometric modeling in recent years. A cross is a collection of four vectors of the same length, with 90 degrees between neighboring vectors. To make a cross field on a surface means to assign a cross to each point on the surface or each face of the mesh representing the surface. The beauty of cross fields is that they can model structures such as the corners of a room. Curves on the surface following the cross fields give rise to a curve network, where two curves can intersect at approximately the right angle. By turning each curve into a flat piece, intersecting curves naturally lead to flat structures that not only approximate the 3D model, but can also be interlocked. This leads to mechanical stability. This research should be interesting not only to artists and toy makers, but also to educators. Cross fields, topology, and geometry are difficult mathematical concepts. With mesh joinery, you can not only see the geometry, but directly interact with it. Who wouldn't love that__?__ Online Computing Reviews Service

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
          ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 33, Issue 1
          January 2014
          179 pages
          ISSN:0730-0301
          EISSN:1557-7368
          DOI:10.1145/2577382
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 February 2014
          • Revised: 1 October 2013
          • Accepted: 1 October 2013
          • Received: 1 May 2013
          Published in tog Volume 33, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader