Sarah Fox
ABSTRACT
This paper examines the motivations, activities, and ideals of people organizing feminist hackerspaces: collaborative workspaces developed to support women's creative and professional pursuits. Drawing on interviews, participant observation and archival data collected across the Pacific Northwest over nine months, we show how members of these spaces use small-scale collaborative design and acts of making to work out their place in society in ways that contest widely accepted understandings of hacking, technology, and collaboration. In designing how the space should look, feel, and run, members reframe activities seldom associated with technical work (e.g., weaving, identity workshops) as forms of hacking. In so doing, they shift concerns for women in technology from questions of access (who is included) to questions of recognition (who is visible) while grappling with productive ambiguities in between. We describe lessons these tension present for examining women's relations with technology in CSCW.
- Allhutter, D. "Mind Scripting A Method for Deconstructive Design." Science, Technology & Human Values 37, no. 6 (2012): 684--707.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Balsamo, A. Designing culture: The technological imagination at work. Duke University Press, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Jour-nal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801--831.Google Scholar
- Bardzell, J., S. Bardzell, and A. Toombs. 2014. "now that's definitely a proper hack": self-made tools in hackerspaces. In Proc. of CHI '14. (2014): 473--476. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, S., and J. Bardzell. "Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI." In Proc. of CHI'11, (2011): 675--684. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bowker, G. C., and S. L. Star. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buechley, L., and B. M. Hill. "LilyPad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities." In Proc. of DIS (2010): 199--207. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Coleman, G. Coding freedom: the ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton University Press, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dawkins, N. "Do-It-Yourself: The Precarious Work and Post-feminist Politics of Handmaking (in) Detroit." Utopian Studies 22, no. 2 (2011): 261--284.Google Scholar
- Dimond, J. P., Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S. Bruckman. "Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization." In Proc. of CSCW'13, (2013): 477--490. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. Re-space-ing place: "place" and "space" ten years on. In Proc. of CSCW '06, (2006): 299--308. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dunbar-Hester, C. "Geeks, Meta-Geeks, and Gender Trouble Activism, Identity, and Low-power FM Radio." Social Studies of Science 38, no. 2 (2008): 201--232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Forte, A., J. Antin, S. Bardzell, L. Honeywell, J. Riedl, and S. Stierch. "Some of all human knowledge: gender and participation in peer production." In Proc. of CSCW'12, (2012): 33--36. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gelber, S. M. Hobbies: Leisure and the culture of work in America. Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Grenzfurthner, J. and F. A. Schneider. "Hacking the Spaces." Monochrom. monochrom.at/hacking-the-spacesGoogle Scholar
- Haraway, Donna. "Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective." Feminist studies (1988): 575--599.Google Scholar
- Harrison, S., and P. Dourish. "Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems." In Proc. of CSCW'96 (1996): 67--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harrison, S., P. Sengers, and D. Tatar. "Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science." Interacting with Computers 23, no. 5 (2011): 385--392. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hartmann, B, S. Doorley, and S. R. Klemmer. "Hacking, mashing, gluing: Understanding opportunistic design." Pervasive Computing, IEEE 7, no. 3 (2008): 46--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hayden, Dolores. The grand domestic revolution: A history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. MIT Press, 1982.Google Scholar
- Hemphill, L., and J. Otterbacher. "Learning the lingo : gender, prestige and linguistic adaptation in review communities." In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hemphill, L, I. Erickson, D. Ribes, and I. Mergel. "Feminism and social media research." In Proc. of the conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, (2014): 319--322. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hird, M J. "Feminist Matters New Materialist Considerations of Sexual Difference." Feminist Theory 5, no. 2 (2004): 223--232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jackson, S. J., A. Pompe, and G. Krieshok. "Repair worlds: maintenance, repair, and ICT for development in rural Namibia." In Proc. CSCW'12, (2012): 107--116. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kolko, B., A. Hope, B. Sattler, K. MacCorkle, and Behzod Sirjani. "Hackademia: building functional rather than accredited engineers." In Proc. of the 12th PDC: Research Papers-Volume 1, (2012): 129--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: SAGE Pub.Google Scholar
- Lindtner, S., G. Hertz, and P. Dourish. "Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators." In Proc. of CHI'14: (2014) 439--448. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matrix (Organization), ed. Making space: women and the man-made environment. Pluto Press (UK), 1984.Google Scholar
- Mellström, U. "The intersection of gender, race and cultural boundaries, or why is computer science in Malaysia dominated by women?." Social Studies of Science 39, no. 6 (2009): 885--907.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mothership Hackermoms mothership.hackermoms.orgGoogle Scholar
- Nafus, D. "'Patches don't have gender': What is not open in open source software." new media & society 14, no. 4 (2012): 669--683.Google Scholar
- Nardi, B. A., and Y. Engeström. "A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work." Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8, no. 1 (1999): 1--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oldenziel, R. Making technology masculine: men, women and modern machines in America, 1870--1945. Amsterdam University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Paulos, E. "The rise of the expert amateur: DIY culture and citizen science." In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 181--182. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rommes, E., C. Bath, and S. Maass. "Methods for intervention: gender analysis and feminist design of ICT." Science, technology, & human values 37, no. 6 (2012): 653--662.Google Scholar
- Rosner, D. K., and M. Ames. "Designing for repair : infrastructures and materialities of breakdown." In Proc. of CSCW'14, pp. 319--331. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosner, D., and J. Bean. "Learning from IKEA hacking: i'm not one to decoupage a tabletop and call it a day." In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2000): 419--422. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosner, D. K. "Making Citizens, Reassembling Devices: On Gender and the Development of Contemporary Public Sites of Repair in Northern California." Public Culture 26, no. 1 72 (2014): 51--77.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sandberg, S. Lean in. AW Bruna LeV., 2013.Google Scholar
- Sefyrin, J. "Entanglements of participation, gender, power and knowledge in IT design." In Proc. of Participatory Design Conference (2010): 111--120. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sivek, S. C. ""We Need a Showing of All Hands" Technological Utopianism in MAKE Magazine." Journal of Communication Inquiry 35, no. 3 (2011): 187--209.Google Scholar
- Star, S. L., and Anselm Strauss. "Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work." Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) 8, no. 1-2 (1999): 9--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Strathern, M. Partial connections. Rowman Alt., 2005.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. "Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered." In Proc. of ECSCW'93, pp. 1--14. Springer Netherlands, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L. "Making work visible." Communications of the ACM 38, no. 9 (1995): 56-ff. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L. "Located accountabilities in technology production."Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, no. 2 (2002): 91--106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tanenbaum, J. G., A. M. Williams, A. Desjardins, and K. Tanenbaum. "Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice." In Proc of CHI'13, pp. 2603--2612. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Toupin, S. "Feminist Hackerspaces as Safer Spaces?" dpi.studioxx.org/en/feminist-hackerspaces-safer-spacesGoogle Scholar
- Wajcman, J. Feminism Confronts Technology. Pennsylvania: Penn State U. Press, 1991.Google Scholar
- Weisman, L. K. Discrimination by design: A feminist critique of the man-made environment. UI Press, 1994.Google Scholar
- White, E. "Revolution Girl Style Now." Rock She Wrote: Women Write About Rock, Pop and Rap. Ed. Evelyn McDonnell and Ann Powers. New York: Dell Publishers, 1995. 396--408.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Hacking Culture, Not Devices: Access and Recognition in Feminist Hackerspaces
Recommendations
Feminist Hackerspaces as Sites for Feminist Design
C&C '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and CognitionThis paper describes the work I have conducted with colleagues in and around feminist hackerspaces -- workspaces that support the creative and professional pursuits of women. Through action research, interviews, and participant observation, I have ...
The Making of Women: Creating Trajectories for Women's Participation in Makerspaces
CSCWThis paper investigates how making activities and participation in makerspaces supports the wellbeing and empowerment of women, particularly in making domains that are typically male-dominated. We spent six months undertaking participant observations in ...
We Are Not All Makers: The Paradox of Plurality In The Maker Movement
DIS '18 Companion: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive SystemsThis paper draws from a critical examination of media and literature surrounding the maker movement, and interviews with 10 women engaged in maker activities. It aims to explore the barriers to women's participation in the maker movement and, in ...
Comments