ABSTRACT
Ultra-small touch screen devices tend to suffer from occlusion or the fat finger problem owing to their limited input area. Callout design, a design principle that involves the placement of a callout in a non-occluded area in order to display the occluded area, could eliminate occlusion. However, callout designs for ultra-small touch screen devices have not yet been explored. In this study, we conducted an experiment to examine eight callout designs for ultra-small touch screen devices. The results show that the selection speed was higher when the content of the callout was changed continuously, the error rate decreased when a pointer was displayed to indicate the touched position within the callout, and the workload decreased when the content was changed continuously. Further, the score that subjectively evaluates the performance decreased when the position of the callout was fixed.
- Patrick Baudisch and Gerry Chu. 2009. Back-of-device Interaction Allows Creating Very Small Touch Devices. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1923-1932. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518995 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2014. Swipeboard: A Text Entry Technique for Ultra-small Interfaces That Supports Novice to Expert Transitions. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 615-620. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647354 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Human mental workload 1, 3 (1988), 139-183.Google Scholar
- Jonggi Hong, Seongkook Heo, Poika Isokoski, and Geehyuk Lee. 2015. SplitBoard: A Simple Split Soft Keyboard for Wristwatch-sized Touch Screens. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1233-1236. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702273 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Makiko Kouchi. 2012. AIST The measurement data of the hands of the Japanese. https://www.dh.aist.go.jp/database/hand/index.html (In Japanese) Last accessed on February 10, 2016. (2012).Google Scholar
- Luis A. Leiva, Alireza Sahami, Alejandro Catala, Niels Henze, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. Text Entry on Tiny QWERTY Soft Keyboards. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 669-678. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702388 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shinji Miyake and Masaharu Kumashiro. 1993. Subjective mental workload assessment technique - An introduction to NASA-TLX and SWAT and a proposal of simple scoring methods -. Human factors and ergonomics 29, 6 (1993), 399-408. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5100/jje.29.399 (In Japanese).Google Scholar
- Stephen Oney, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan, and Jason Wiese. 2013. ZoomBoard: A Diminutive QWERTY Soft Keyboard using Iterative Zooming for Ultra-small Devices. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2799-2802. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481387 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard L. Potter, Linda J. Weldon, and Ben Shneiderman. 1988. Improving the Accuracy of Touch Screens: An Experimental Evaluation of Three Strategies. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '88). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/57167.57171 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Sears and Ben Shneiderman. 1991. High Precision Touchscreens: Design Strategies and Comparisons with a Mouse. International Journal of ManMachine Studies 34, 4 (April 1991), 593-613. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020--7373(91)90037--8 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katie A. Siek, Yvonne Rogers, and Kay H. Connelly. 2005. Fat Finger Worries: How Older and Younger Users Physically Interact with PDAs. In Proceedings of the 2005 IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'05). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 267-280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11555261_24 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Vogel and Patrick Baudisch. 2007. Shift: A Technique for Operating Pen-based Interfaces using Touch. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 657-666. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240727 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haijun Xia, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. NanoStylus: Enhancing Input on UltraSmall Displays with a Finger-Mounted Stylus. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 447-456. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807500 Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Evaluation of Callout Design for Ultra-small Touch Screen Devices
Recommendations
Exploring callout design in selection task for ultra-small touch screen devices
OzCHI '16: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human InteractionUltra-small touch screen devices tend to suffer from occlusion or the fat finger problem owing to their limited input area. A callout could solve these problems by displaying a copy of the occluded area in a non-occluded area. However, callout designs ...
Flickey: Flick-Based QWERTY Software Keyboard for Ultra-small Touch Screen Devices
Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction TechnologiesAbstractUltra-small touch screen devices (e.g., smartwatches) are required to be small and lightweight so that they can be worn on the body with no frustration. For this reason, users often have difficulties in selecting the correct keys, and thus ...
Exploring tilt for no-touch, wrist-only interactions on smartwatches
MobileHCI '16: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and ServicesBecause smartwatches are worn on the wrist, they do not require users to hold the device, leaving at least one hand free to engage in other activities. Unfortunately, this benefit is thwarted by the typical interaction model of smartwatches; for ...
Comments