skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2892434acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Evaluation of Callout Design for Ultra-small Touch Screen Devices

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ultra-small touch screen devices tend to suffer from occlusion or the fat finger problem owing to their limited input area. Callout design, a design principle that involves the placement of a callout in a non-occluded area in order to display the occluded area, could eliminate occlusion. However, callout designs for ultra-small touch screen devices have not yet been explored. In this study, we conducted an experiment to examine eight callout designs for ultra-small touch screen devices. The results show that the selection speed was higher when the content of the callout was changed continuously, the error rate decreased when a pointer was displayed to indicate the touched position within the callout, and the workload decreased when the content was changed continuously. Further, the score that subjectively evaluates the performance decreased when the position of the callout was fixed.

References

  1. Patrick Baudisch and Gerry Chu. 2009. Back-of-device Interaction Allows Creating Very Small Touch Devices. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1923-1932. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518995 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2014. Swipeboard: A Text Entry Technique for Ultra-small Interfaces That Supports Novice to Expert Transitions. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 615-620. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647354 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Human mental workload 1, 3 (1988), 139-183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jonggi Hong, Seongkook Heo, Poika Isokoski, and Geehyuk Lee. 2015. SplitBoard: A Simple Split Soft Keyboard for Wristwatch-sized Touch Screens. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1233-1236. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702273 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Makiko Kouchi. 2012. AIST The measurement data of the hands of the Japanese. https://www.dh.aist.go.jp/database/hand/index.html (In Japanese) Last accessed on February 10, 2016. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Luis A. Leiva, Alireza Sahami, Alejandro Catala, Niels Henze, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. Text Entry on Tiny QWERTY Soft Keyboards. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 669-678. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702388 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Shinji Miyake and Masaharu Kumashiro. 1993. Subjective mental workload assessment technique - An introduction to NASA-TLX and SWAT and a proposal of simple scoring methods -. Human factors and ergonomics 29, 6 (1993), 399-408. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5100/jje.29.399 (In Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Stephen Oney, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan, and Jason Wiese. 2013. ZoomBoard: A Diminutive QWERTY Soft Keyboard using Iterative Zooming for Ultra-small Devices. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2799-2802. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481387 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Richard L. Potter, Linda J. Weldon, and Ben Shneiderman. 1988. Improving the Accuracy of Touch Screens: An Experimental Evaluation of Three Strategies. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '88). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/57167.57171 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Andrew Sears and Ben Shneiderman. 1991. High Precision Touchscreens: Design Strategies and Comparisons with a Mouse. International Journal of ManMachine Studies 34, 4 (April 1991), 593-613. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020--7373(91)90037--8 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Katie A. Siek, Yvonne Rogers, and Kay H. Connelly. 2005. Fat Finger Worries: How Older and Younger Users Physically Interact with PDAs. In Proceedings of the 2005 IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'05). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 267-280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11555261_24 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel Vogel and Patrick Baudisch. 2007. Shift: A Technique for Operating Pen-based Interfaces using Touch. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 657-666. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240727 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Haijun Xia, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. NanoStylus: Enhancing Input on UltraSmall Displays with a Finger-Mounted Stylus. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 447-456. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807500 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of Callout Design for Ultra-small Touch Screen Devices

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 2016
            3954 pages
            ISBN:9781450340823
            DOI:10.1145/2851581

            Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 May 2016

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • abstract

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader