ABSTRACT
Ultra-small touch screen devices tend to suffer from occlusion or the fat finger problem owing to their limited input area. A callout could solve these problems by displaying a copy of the occluded area in a non-occluded area. However, callout designs for ultra-small touch screen devices have not yet been explored in depth. In this study, we chose three design factors (each factor has two levels) from various factors and conducted an experiment to examine eight callout designs in the selection task for ultra-small touch screen devices. The results of our experiment matched the results from previous research; however, we also obtained results unique to ultra-small devices. The results showed that the selection speed was higher when the content of the callout was changed continuously, the error rate decreased when the content of the callout was changed continuously and a pointer was displayed to indicate the touched position within the callout, and the workload decreased when the content was changed continuously. Further, as a design factor, the position of the callout would not affect the selection performance.
- Baudisch, P., and Chu, G. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM, 1923--1932. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brandl, P., Leitner, J., Seifried, T., Haller, M., Doray, B., and To, P. Occlusion-aware menu design for digital tabletops. In Proc. CHI EA 2009, ACM, 3223--3228. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chapuis, O., and Dragicevic, P. Effects of motor scale, visual scale, and quantization on small target acquisition difficulty. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 3 (2011), 13:1--13:32.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chen, X. A., Grossman, T., and Fitzmaurice, G. Swipe-board: A text entry technique for ultra-small interfaces that supports novice to expert transitions. In Proc. UIST 2014, ACM, 615--620.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cockburn, A., Ahlstrm, D., and Gutwin, C. Understanding performance in touch selections: Tap, drag and radial pointing drag with finger, stylus and mouse. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 3 (2012), 218--233. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gordon, M., Ouyang, T., and Zhai, S. WatchWriter: Tap and gesture typing on a smartwatch miniature keyboard with statistical decoding. In Proc. CHI 2016, ACM, 3817--3821. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human mental workload 1, 3 (1988), 139--183.Google Scholar
- Holz, C., and Baudisch, P. The generalized perceived input point model and how to double touch accuracy by extracting fingerprints. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM, 581--590. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hong, J., Heo, S., Isokoski, P., and Lee, G. SplitBoard: A simple split soft keyboard for wristwatch-sized touch screens. In Proc. CHI 2015, ACM, 1233--1236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ishii, A., Shizuki, B., and Tanaka, J. Evaluation of callout design for ultra-small touch screen devices. In Proc. CHI EA 2016, ACM, 2511--2518. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khalilbeigi, M., Schmittat, P., Mühlhäuser, M., and Steimle, J. Occlusion-aware interaction techniques for tabletop systems. In Proc. CHI EA 2012, ACM, 2531--2536. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Komninos, A., and Dunlop, M. Text input on a smart watch. Pervasive Computing, IEEE 13, 4 (2014), 50--58. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kouchi, M. Aist the measurement data of the hands of the japanese. https://www.dh.aist.go.jp/database/hand/index.html (In Japanese), Last accessed on October 7, 2016, 2012.Google Scholar
- Leiva, L. A., Sahami, A., Catala, A., Henze, N., and Schmidt, A. Text entry on tiny QWERTY soft keyboards. In Proc. CHI 2015, ACM, 669--678. Google ScholarDigital Library
- MacKenzie, I. S., Sellen, A., and Buxton, W. A. S. A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks. In Proc. CHI 1991, ACM, 161--166. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miyake, S., and Kumashiro, M. Subjective mental workload assessment technique - an introduction to NASA-TLX and SWAT and a proposal of simple scoring methods -. Human factors and ergonomics 29, 6 (1993), 399--408. (In Japanese).Google Scholar
- Oney, S., Harrison, C., Ogan, A., and Wiese, J. Zoom-Board: A diminutive QWERTY soft keyboard using iterative zooming for ultra-small devices. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM, 2799--2802.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Potter, R. L., Weldon, L. J., and Shneiderman, B. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: An experimental evaluation of three strategies. In Proc. CHI 1988, ACM, 27--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sears, A., and Shneiderman, B. High precision touchscreens: Design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34, 4 (1991), 593--613. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Siek, K. A., Rogers, Y., and Connelly, K. H. Fat finger worries: How older and younger users physically interact with PDAs. In Proc. INTERACT 2005, Springer-Verlag, 267--280. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vogel, D., and Balakrishnan, R. Occlusion-aware interfaces. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM, 263--272. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vogel, D., and Baudisch, P. Shift: A technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM, 657--666. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xia, H., Grossman, T., and Fitzmaurice, G. NanoStylus: Enhancing input on ultra-small displays with a finger-mounted stylus. In Proc. UIST 2015, ACM, 447--456. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Exploring callout design in selection task for ultra-small touch screen devices
Recommendations
Evaluation of Callout Design for Ultra-small Touch Screen Devices
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsUltra-small touch screen devices tend to suffer from occlusion or the fat finger problem owing to their limited input area. Callout design, a design principle that involves the placement of a callout in a non-occluded area in order to display the ...
Flickey: Flick-Based QWERTY Software Keyboard for Ultra-small Touch Screen Devices
Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction TechnologiesAbstractUltra-small touch screen devices (e.g., smartwatches) are required to be small and lightweight so that they can be worn on the body with no frustration. For this reason, users often have difficulties in selecting the correct keys, and thus ...
Rubbing and tapping for precise and rapid selection on touch-screen displays
CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe introduce two families of techniques, rubbing and tapping, that use zooming to make possible precise interaction on passive touch screens, and describe examples of each. Rub-Pointing uses a diagonal rubbing gesture to integrate pointing and zooming ...
Comments