skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2481387acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ZoomBoard: a diminutive qwerty soft keyboard using iterative zooming for ultra-small devices

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of touchscreen devices has made soft keyboards a routine part of life. However, ultra-small computing platforms like the Sony SmartWatch and Apple iPod Nano lack a means of text entry. This limits their potential, despite the fact they are quite capable computers. In this work, we present a soft keyboard interaction technique called ZoomBoard that enables text entry on ultra-small devices. Our approach uses iterative zooming to enlarge otherwise impossibly tiny keys to comfortable size. We based our design on a QWERTY layout, so that it is immediately familiar to users and leverages existing skill. As the ultimate test, we ran a text entry experiment on a keyboard measuring just 16 x 6mm - smaller than a US penny. After eight practice trials, users achieved an average of 9.3 words per minute, with accuracy comparable to a full-sized physical keyboard. This compares favorably to existing mobile text input methods.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

chi0492-file3.mp4

mp4

13.9 MB

References

  1. Albinsson, P. and Zhai, S. High precision touchscreen interaction. In Proc. CHI '03. 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bates, R. and Istance, H. Zooming interfaces!: enhancing the performance of eye controlled pointing devices. In Proc. ASSETS '02. 119--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bederson, B. B. and Hollan, J.D., Pad++: A zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. In Proc. UIST '94. 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bi, X., Smith, B. A., and Zhai, S. Quasi-qwerty soft keyboard optimization. In Proc. CHI '10. 283--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Castellucci, S. and MacKenzie, S. Graffiti vs. unistrokes: an empirical comparison. In Proc. CHI '08. 305--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cockburn, A., Karlson, A., and Bederson, B. B. A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 41,1, (January 2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Felzer, T. and Nordmann, R., Alternative text entry using different input methods. In Proc. ASSETS 2006. 10--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gajos, K. Z., Wobbrock, J. O. and Weld, D. S. Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities. In Proc. UIST '07. 231--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Goldberg, D. and Richardson, C. Touch-typing with a stylus. In Proc. CHI '93. 80--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Guiard, Y., M. Beaudouin-Lafon, and D. Mottet. Navigation as multiscale pointing: Extending fitts' model to very high precision tasks. In Proc. CHI 1999. 450--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Harrison, C. and Dey, A. K. Lean and zoom: proximity-aware user interface and content magnification. Proc. CHI '08. 507--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hwang S. and Lee, G. Qwerty-like 3x4 keypad layouts for mobile phone. In CHI EA '05. 1479--1482. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ingmarsson, M., Dinka, D., and Zhai, S. TNT: a numeric keypad based text input method. In Proc. CHI '04. 639--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kim, S., Sohn, M., Pak, J., and Lee, W. One-key keyboard: a very small QWERTY keyboard supporting text entry for wearable computing. In Proc. OZCHI '06. 305--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Li, F., Guy, R. T., Yatani, K., and Truong, K. N. The 1line keyboard: a QWERTY layout in a single line. In Proc. UIST '11. 461--470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lyons, K., Starner, T., Plaisted, D., Fusia, J., Lyons, A., Drew, A., and Looney, E. W. Twiddler typing: one-handed chording text entry for mobile phones. In Proc. CHI '04. 671--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. MacKenzie, I. S., Soukoreff, R. W., and Helga, J. 1 thumb, 4 buttons, 20 words per minute: design and evaluation of H4-writer. In Proc. UIST '11. 471--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In Proc. CHI EA '03. 754--755. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. MacKenzie, I. S., and Zhang, S. X. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. In Proc. CHI '99. 25--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Miner, C. S., Chan, D. M. and Campbell, C. Digital jewelry: wearable technology for everyday life. In CHI EA '01. 45--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ni, T. and Baudisch, P. Disappearing mobile devices. In Proc. UIST '09. 101--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Olwal, A., Feiner, S., and Heyman, S. Rubbing and tapping for precise and rapid selection on touch-screen displays. In Proc. CHI '08. 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Robertson, G. G., Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D. Information Visualization Using 3D Interactive Animation. CACM, 36(4), 1993. 56--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ward, D. J., Blackwell, A. F., and MacKay, D. J. C. Dasher - a data entry interface using continuous gestures and language models. In Proc. UIST '00. 129--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Weiser, M. The computer for the 21st century. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 3, 3 (July 1999), 3--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wigdor, D. and Balakrishnan, R. TiltText: using tilt for text input to mobile phones. In Proc. UIST '03. 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Kembel, J. A. EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. In Proc. UIST '03. 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Rothrock, B. Few-key text entry revisited: mnemonic gestures on four keys. In Proc. CHI '06. 489--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zhai, S., Hunter, M. and Smith, B. A. Performance optimization of virtual keyboards. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 17, 2,3 (2002). 89--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Zhai, S., Hunter, M., and Smith, B. A. The metropolis keyboard - an exploration of quantitative techniques for virtual keyboard design. In Proc. UIST '00. 119--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ZoomBoard: a diminutive qwerty soft keyboard using iterative zooming for ultra-small devices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader