skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858390acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access
Best Paper

Smart Touch: Improving Touch Accuracy for People with Motor Impairments with Template Matching

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present two contributions toward improving the accessibility of touch screens for people with motor impairments. First, we provide an exploration of the touch behaviors of 10 people with motor impairments, e.g., we describe how touching with the back or sides of the hand, with multiple fingers, or with knuckles creates varied multi-point touches. Second, we introduce Smart Touch, a novel template-matching technique for touch input that maps any number of arbitrary contact-areas to a user's intended (x,y) target location. The result is that users with motor impairments can touch however their abilities allow, and Smart Touch will resolve their intended touch point. Smart Touch therefore allows users to touch targets in whichever ways are most comfortable and natural for them. In an experimental evaluation, we found that Smart Touch predicted (x,y) coordinates of the users' intended target locations over three times closer to the intended target than the native Land-on and Lift-off techniques reported by the built-in touch sensors found in the Microsoft PixelSense interactive tabletop. This result is an important step toward improving touch accuracy for people with motor impairments and others for whom touch screen operation was previously impossible.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1934-mott.mp4

mp4

148.1 MB

References

  1. Pär-Anders Albinsson and Shumin Zhai. 2003. High precision touch screen interaction. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), ACM Press, 105--112. http://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642631 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Lisa Anthony, YooJin Kim, and Leah Findlater. 2013. Analyzing user-generated Youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), ACM Press, 1223--1232. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466158 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. "Beating" Fitts' law: Virtual enhancements for pointing facilitation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6: 857--874. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hrvoje Benko, Andrew D. Wilson, and Patrick Baudisch. 2006. Precise selection techniques for multitouch screens. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), ACM, 1263--1272. http://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124963 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Pradipta Biswas and Patrick Langdon. 2012. Developing multimodal adaptation algorithm for mobility impaired users by evaluating their hand strength. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 28, 9: 576--596. http://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.636294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Xiaojun Bi, Yang Li, and Shumin Zhai. 2013. FFitts law: Modeling finger touch with Fitts' law. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), ACM, 1363--1372. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466180 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Xiaojun Bi and Shumin Zhai. 2013. Bayesian touch: A statistical criterion of target selection with finger touch. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '13), ACM Press, 51--60. http://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502058 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Karen B. Chen, Anne B. Savage, Amrish O. Chourasia, Douglas A. Wiegmann, and Mary E. Sesto. 2013. Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities. Applied Ergonomics 44, 2: 297--302. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.08.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Morgan Dixon, James Fogarty, and Jacob Wobbrock. 2012. A general-purpose target-aware pointing enhancement using pixel-level analysis of graphical interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), ACM Press, 3167--3176. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208734 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sacha N. Duff, Curt B. Irwin, Jennifer L. Skye, Mary E. Sesto, and Douglas A. Wiegmann. 2010. The effect of disability and approach on touch screen performance during a number entry task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 566--570.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Abigail Evans and Jacob Wobbrock. 2012. Taming wild behavior: The input observer for obtaining text entry and mouse pointing measures from everyday computer use. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), ACM, 1947--1956. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208338 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Leah Findlater, Alex Jansen, Kristen Shinohara, Morgan Dixon, Peter Kamb, Joshua Rakita, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2010. Enhanced area cursors: Reducing fine pointing demands for people with motor impairments. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '10), ACM Press, 153--162. http://doi.org/10.1145/1866029.1866055 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jon Froehlich, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Shaun K. Kane. 2007. Barrier pointing: Using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '07), ACM Press, 19--26. http://doi.org/10.1145/1296843.1296849 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Daniel S. Weld. 2007. Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '07), ACM Press, 231--240. http://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294253 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Daniel S. Weld. 2008. Improving the performance of motorimpaired users with automatically-generated, abilitybased interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), ACM, 1257--1266. http://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357250 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tiago João Vieira Guerreiro, Hugo Nicolau, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Gonçalves. 2010. Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '10), ACM Press, 31--34. http://doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851608 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tiago Guerreiro, Hugo Nicolau, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Gonçalves. 2010. Towards accessible touch interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '10), ACM, 19--26. http://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878809 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sture Holm. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 2: 65--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Christian Holz and Patrick Baudisch. 2010. The generalized perceived input point model and how to double touch accuracy by extracting fingerprints. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10), ACM, 581--590. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753413 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Christian Holz and Patrick Baudisch. 2011. Understanding touch. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), ACM, 2501--2510. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979308 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Curt B. Irwin and Mary E. Sesto. 2012. Performance and touch characteristics of disabled and non-disabled participants during a reciprocal tapping task using touch screen technology. Applied Ergonomics 43, 6: 1038--1043. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.03.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Shaun K. Kane, Chandrika Jayant, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. Freedom to roam: A study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '09), ACM, 115--122. http://doi.org/10.1145/1639642.1639663 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. C. Littell, P. R. Henry, and C. B. Ammerman. 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 4: 1216--1231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tom M. Mitchell. 1997. Machine Learning. McGrawHill Education, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kyle Montague, Vicki L. Hanson, and Andy Cobley. 2012. Designing for individuals: Usable touch-screen interaction through shared user models. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '12), ACM Press, 151--158. http://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384943 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kyle Montague, Hugo Nicolau, and Vicki L. Hanson. 2014. Motor-impaired touchscreen interactions in the wild. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '14), ACM, 123--130. http://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661362 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Maia Naftali and Leah Findlater. 2014. Accessibility in context: Understanding the truly mobile experience of smartphone users with motor impairments. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '14), ACM Press, 209--216. http://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661372 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pekka Parhi, Amy K. Karlson, and Benjamin B. Bederson. 2006. Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '06), ACM Press, 203--210. http://doi.org/10.1145/1152215.1152260 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. R. L. Potter, L. J. Weldon, and B. Shneiderman. 1988. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: An experimental evaluation of three strategies. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '88), ACM, 27--32. http://doi.org/10.1145/57167.57171 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Julia Schwarz, Scott Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2010. A framework for robust and flexible handling of inputs with uncertainty. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '10), ACM Press, 47--56. http://doi.org/10.1145/1866029.1866039 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Julia Schwarz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Scott Hudson. 2011. Monte Carlo methods for managing interactive state, action and feedback under uncertainty. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '11), ACM, 235--244. http://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047227 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Julia Schwarz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Scott E. Hudson. 2015. An architecture for generating interactive feedback in probabilistic user interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), ACM Press, 2545--2554. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702228 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Andrew Sears, Min Lin, Julie Jacko, and Yan Xiao. 2003. When computers fade -- pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI Int'l' 03), 1298--1302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Andrew Sears and Ben Shneiderman. 1991. High precision touchscreens: Design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34, 4: 593--613. http://doi.org/10.1016/0020--7373(91)90037-8 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Shari Trewin, Cal Swart, and Donna Pettick. 2013. Physical accessibility of touchscreen smartphones. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '13), ACM, 19:1--19:8. http://doi.org/10.1145/2513383.2513446 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Lisa Anthony, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2012. Gestures as point clouds: A $P recognizer for user interface prototypes. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '12), ACM, 273--280. http://doi.org/10.1145/2388676.2388732 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Daniel Vogel and Patrick Baudisch. 2007. Shift: A technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), ACM, 657--666. http://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240727 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Chat Wacharamanotham, Jan Hurtmanns, Alexander Mertens, Martin Kronenbuerger, Christopher Schlick, and Jan Borchers. 2011. Evaluating swabbing: A touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), ACM Press, 623--626. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979031 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Daryl Weir. 2012. Machine learning models for uncertain interaction. Adjunct Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '12), ACM, 31--34. http://doi.org/10.1145/2380296.2380313 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Daryl Weir, Simon Rogers, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Markus Löchtefeld. 2012. A user-specific machine learning approach for improving touch accuracy on mobile devices. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '12), ACM Press, 465--476. http://doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380175 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Daniel Wigdor, Clifton Forlines, Patrick Baudisch, John Barnwell, and Chia Shen. 2007. Lucid Touch: A seethrough mobile device. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '07), ACM Press, 269--278. http://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294259 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2014. Improving pointing in graphical user interfaces for people with motor impairments through ability-based design. In Assitive Technologies and Computer Access for Motor Disabilities. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 206--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Jacob O. Wobbrock, James Fogarty, Shih-Yen (Sean) Liu, Shunichi Kimuro, and Susumu Harada. 2009. The Angle Mouse: Target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), ACM, 1401--1410. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518912 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 3, 3: 9:1--9:27. http://doi.org/10.1145/1952383.1952384 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Brad A. Myers, and John A. Kembel. 2003. EdgeWrite: A stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '03), ACM Press, 61--70. http://doi.org/10.1145/964696.964703 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Andrew D. Wilson, and Yang Li. 2007. Gestures without libraries, toolkits or training: A $1 recognizer for user interface prototypes. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '07), ACM, 159--168. http://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294238 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Smart Touch: Improving Touch Accuracy for People with Motor Impairments with Template Matching

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2016
        6108 pages
        ISBN:9781450333627
        DOI:10.1145/2858036

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 May 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader