ABSTRACT
We present Cluster Touch, a combined user-independent and user-specific touch offset model that improves the accuracy of touch input on smartphones for people with motor impairments, and for people experiencing situational impairments while walking. Cluster Touch combines touch examples from multiple users to create a shared user-independent touch model, which is then updated with touch examples provided by an individual user to make it user-specific. Owing to this combination, Cluster Touch allows people to quickly improve the accuracy of their smartphones by providing only 20 touch examples. In a user study with 12 people with motor impairments and 12 people without motor impairments, but who were walking, Cluster Touch improved touch accuracy by 14.65% for the former group and 6.81% for the latter group over the native touch sensor. Furthermore, in an offline analysis of existing mobile interfaces, Cluster Touch improved touch accuracy by 8.21% and 4.84% over the native touch sensor for the two user groups, respectively.
- Lisa Anthony, YooJin Kim, and Leah Findlater. 2013. Analyzing user-generated Youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2013, 1223--1232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. "Beating" Fitts' law: Virtual enhancements for pointing facilitation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6: 857--874. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joanna Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, Antti Oulasvirta, and Stephen Brewster. 2011. The effects of walking speed on target acquisition on a touchscreen interface. Proceedings of ACM MobileHCI 2011, 143--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiaojun Bi, Yang Li, and Shumin Zhai. 2013. FFitts law: Modeling finger touch with Fitts' law. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2013, 1363-- 1372. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiaojun Bi and Shumin Zhai. 2013. Bayesian touch: A statistical criterion of target selection with finger touch. Proceedings of ACM UIST 2013, 51--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pradipta Biswas and Patrick Langdon. 2012. Developing multimodal adaptation algorithm for mobility impaired users by evaluating their hand strength. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 28, 9: 576--596.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Buschek and Florian Alt. 2015. TouchML: A Machine learning toolkit for modelling spatial touch targeting behaviour. Proceedings of ACM IUI 2015, 110--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Buschek and Florian Alt. 2017. ProbUI: Generalising touch target representations to enable declarative gesture definition for probabilistic GUIs. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2017, 4640--4653. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Buschek, Simon Rogers, and Roderick Murray-Smith. 2013. User-specific touch models in a cross-device context. Proceedings of ACM MobileHCI 2013, 382--391. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karen B. Chen, Anne B. Savage, Amrish O. Chourasia, Douglas A. Wiegmann, and Mary E. Sesto. 2013. Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities. Applied Ergonomics 44, 2: 297--302.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew Crossan, Roderick Murray-Smith, Stephen Brewster, James Kelly, and Bojan Musizza. 2005. Gait phase effects in mobile interaction. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2005, 1312--1315. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Biplab Deka, Zifeng Huang, Chad Franzen, Joshua Hibschman, Daniel Afergan, Yang Li, Jeffrey Nichols, and Ranjitha Kumar. 2017. RICO: A mobile app dataset for building data-driven design applications. Proceedings of ACM UIST 2017, 845--854. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morgan Dixon, James Fogarty, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2012. A general-purpose target-aware pointing enhancement using pixel-level analysis of graphical interfaces. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2012, 3167--3176. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sacha N. Duff, Curt B. Irwin, Jennifer L. Skye, Mary E. Sesto, and Douglas A. Wiegmann. 2010. The effect of disability and approach on touch screen performance during a number entry task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Conference (HFES '10), 566--570.Google Scholar
- Leah Findlater, Alex Jansen, Kristen Shinohara, Morgan Dixon, Peter Kamb, Joshua Rakita, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2010. Enhanced area cursors: Reducing fine pointing demands for people with motor impairments. Proceedings of ACM UIST 2010, 153--162. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leah Findlater, Karyn Moffatt, Jon E. Froehlich, Meethu Malu, and Joan Zhang. 2017. Comparing touchscreen and mouse input performance by people with and without upper body motor impairments. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2017, 6056--6061. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jon Froehlich, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Shaun K. Kane. 2007. Barrier pointing: Using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. Proceedings of ACM ASSETS 2007, 19--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krzysztof Gajos, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Daniel S. Weld. 2007. Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities. Proceedings of ACM UIST 2007, 231--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Daniel S. Weld. 2008. Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2008, 1257--1266. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mayank Goel, Leah Findlater, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2012. WalkType: Using accelerometer data to accomodate situational impairments in mobile touch screen text entry. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2012, 2687--2696. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mayank Goel, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Shwetak Patel. 2012. GripSense: Using built-in sensors to detect hand posture and pressure on commodity mobile phones. Proceedings of ACM UIST 2012, 545--554. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tiago Guerreiro, Hugo Nicolau, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Gonçalves. 2010. Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics. Proceedings of ACM MobileHCI 2010, 31--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tiago Guerreiro, Hugo Nicolau, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Gonçalves. 2010. Towards accessible touch interfaces. Proceedings of ACM ASSETS 2010, 19--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. A. Hartigan and M. A. Wong. 1979. Algorithm AS 136: A KMeans clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 28, 1: 100--108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niels Henze, Enrico Rukzio, and Susanne Boll. 2011. 100,000,000 Taps: Analysis and improvement of touch performance in the large. Proceedings of ACM MobileHCI 2011, 133--142. Google ScholarDigital Library
- James J. Higgins and S Tashtoush. 1994. An aligned rank transform test for interaction. Nonlinear World 1, 2: 201--211.Google Scholar
- Sture Holm. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 2: 65--70.Google Scholar
- Christian Holz and Patrick Baudisch. 2010. The generalized perceived input point model and how to double touch accuracy by extracting fingerprints. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2010, 581--590. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christian Holz and Patrick Baudisch. 2011. Understanding touch. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011, 2501--2510. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Curt B. Irwin and Mary E. Sesto. 2012. Performance and touch characteristics of disabled and non-disabled participants during a reciprocal tapping task using touch screen technology. Applied Ergonomics 43, 6: 1038--1043.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shaun K. Kane, Chandrika Jayant, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. Freedom to roam: A study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. Proceedings of ACM ASSETS 2009, 115--122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shaun K. Kane, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Ian E. Smith. 2008. Getting off the treadmill: Evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. Proceedings of ACM MobileHCI 2008, 109--118. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Min Lin, Rich Goldman, Kathleen J. Price, Andrew Sears, and Julie Jacko. 2007. How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 9: 759--769. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. C. Littell, P. R. Henry, and C. B. Ammerman. 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 4: 1216--1231.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tom M. Mitchell. 1997. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill Education, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karyn Moffatt and Joanna McGrenere. 2010. Steadied-bubbles: Combining techniques to address pen-based pointing errors for younger and older adults. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2010, 1125-- 1134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kyle Montague, Vicki L. Hanson, and Andy Cobley. 2012. Designing for individuals: Usable touch-screen interaction through shared user models. Proceedings of ACM ASSETS 2012, 151--158. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kyle Montague, Hugo Nicolau, and Vicki L. Hanson. 2014. Motorimpaired touchscreen interactions in the wild. Proceedings of ACM ASSETS 2014, 123--130. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martez E. Mott, Jane E., Cynthia L. Bennett, Edward Cutrell, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2018. Understanding the accessibility of smartphone photography for people with motor impairments. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2018, 520:1--520:12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martez E. Mott, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Shaun K. Kane, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Smart Touch: Improving touch accuracy for people with motor Impairments with template matching. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2016, 1934--1946. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Josip Music, Daryl Weir, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Simon Rogers. 2016. Modelling and correcting for the impact of the gait cycle on touch screen typing accuracy. mUX: The Journal of Mobile User Experience 5, 1: 1--11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maia Naftali and Leah Findlater. 2014. Accessibility in context: Understanding the truly mobile experience of smartphone users with motor impairments. Proceedings of ACM ASSETS 2014, 209--216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matei Negulescu and Joanna McGrenere. 2015. Grip change as an information side channel for mobile touch interaction. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2015, 1519--1522. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander Ng. 2014. The effects of encumbrance on mobile interactions. Proceedings of ACM MobileHCI 2014, 405--406. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. C. Salter and R. F. Fawcett. 1993. The art test of interaction: a robust and powerful rank test of interaction in factorial models. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 22, 1: 137--153.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julia Schwarz, Scott Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2010. A framework for robust and flexible handling of inputs with uncertainty. Proceedings of ACM UIST 2010, 47--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julia Schwarz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Scott Hudson. 2011. Monte Carlo methods for managing interactive state, action and feedback under uncertainty. Proceedings of ACM UIST 2011, 235--244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julia Schwarz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Scott E. Hudson. 2015. An architecture for generating interactive feedback in probabilistic user interfaces. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2015, 2545--2554. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Sears, Min Lin, Julie Jacko, and Yan Xiao. 2003. When computers fade... Pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. Proceedings of HCI International 2003, 1298--1302.Google Scholar
- Andrew Sears and Mark Young. 2003. Physical disabilities and computing technologies: an analysis of impairments. In Julie A. Jacko and Andrew Sears (eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 482--503. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=772072.772105 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shari Trewin, Cal Swart, and Donna Pettick. 2013. Physical accessibility of touchscreen smartphones. Proceedings of ACM ASSETS 2013, 19:1--19:8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Vogel and Patrick Baudisch. 2007. Shift: A technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2007, 657--666. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chat Wacharamanotham, Jan Hurtmanns, Alexander Mertens, Martin Kronenbuerger, Christopher Schlick, and Jan Borchers. 2011. Evaluating swabbing: A touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011, 623--626. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daryl Weir. 2012. Machine learning models for uncertain interaction. Adjunct Proceedings of ACM UIST 2012, 31--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daryl Weir, Simon Rogers, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Markus Löchtefeld. 2012. A user-specific machine learning approach for improving touch accuracy on mobile devices. Proceedings of ACM UIST 2012, 465--476. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob O. Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J. Higgins. 2011. The Aligned Rank Transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011, 143--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob O. Wobbrock, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Shaun K. Kane, and Gregg C. Vanderheiden. 2018. Ability-based design. Communications of the ACM 61, 6: 62--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 3, 3: 9:1--9:27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob O. Wobbrock, Brad A. Myers, and John A. Kembel. 2003. EdgeWrite: A stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. Proceedings of ACM UIST 2003, 61--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Cluster Touch: Improving Touch Accuracy on Smartphones for People with Motor and Situational Impairments
Recommendations
Smart Touch: Improving Touch Accuracy for People with Motor Impairments with Template Matching
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe present two contributions toward improving the accessibility of touch screens for people with motor impairments. First, we provide an exploration of the touch behaviors of 10 people with motor impairments, e.g., we describe how touching with the back ...
Accessible Touch Input for People with Motor Impairments
CHI EA '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsTouch input has emerged as a dominant form of interaction for billions of interactive computing devices like smartphones, tablets, and interactive surfaces. Although touch input is widely used, it remains largely inaccessible for many people with motor ...
The extent of mobile accessibility coverage in WCAG 2.1: sufficiency of success criteria and appropriateness of relevant conformance levels pertaining to accessibility problems encountered by users who are visually impaired
AbstractPeople who are blind or visually impaired exhibit different interaction and access needs on mobile touchscreen devices. This is rooted in the reliance on non-visual access for using electronic devices. In comparison to regular computers, non-...
Comments